Meme狂热消散, BTC上行受阻

PanewsPubblicato 2023-05-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-05-16

Introduzione

比推终端数据显示,过去24小时,比特币(BTC) 一度暴跌至26,000 美元的两个月低点, 七天跌幅超过10%,达到自3 月17 日以来的最低水平。山寨币也未能幸免,Aptos (APT) 下跌20%,Filecoin (FIL) 和Arbitrum (ARB) 各下跌约17%。截至发稿时,比特币的交易价格小幅反弹至26,800 美元附近,但仍未突破27,000美元。

比推终端数据显示,过去24小时,比特币(BTC) 一度暴跌至26,000 美元的两个月低点, 七天跌幅超过10%,达到自3 月17 日以来的最低水平。山寨币也未能幸免,Aptos (APT) 下跌20%,Filecoin (FIL) 和Arbitrum (ARB) 各下跌约17%。截至发稿时,比特币的交易价格小幅反弹至26,800 美元附近,但仍未突破27,000美元。

Meme板块开始“熄火”

最近大热的memecoin 板块走势也出现大幅逆转,尤其是Pepecoin (PEPE),在过去一周的交易中下跌了60% 以上。这个基于悲伤蛙表情包的新代币于4 月首次亮相,市值迅速升至超过10 亿美元,现在已缩水至约5.6 亿美元。其他暴跌的memecoin 币包括狗狗币(Doge) 和柴犬币(SHIB),它们在过去7 天内均下跌了约11%。

上市比特币矿业公司BTCM 首席经济学家Youwei Yang 对Coindesk表示:“Meme币的炒作通常令人兴奋,但随后往往会出现市场崩盘,类似于我们两年前在Doge和SHIB上看到的情况,本周memecoins 的修正主要是由于人们对这些新memecoins 的FOMO(害怕错过)情绪冷却了。”

市场流动性和监管压力阻碍比特币走势

全球最大的加密货币交易平台币安以监管为由宣布将退出加拿大市场。该消息发布后,比特币市值一度大幅下滑,从5090 亿美元跌至约5010 亿美元,然后迅速回升至5100 亿美元以上。

币安与加拿大的问题至少可以追溯到几年前。 2021 年,该公司因监管打击而停止在安大略省开展业务。在加拿大证券管理局于2 月发布新法规后,Paxos 和dYdX 今年都离开了加拿大。

The Block Research 分析师Kevin Peng 评论称:“这似乎是对币安持续监管不确定性的自然反应。过去一周市场一直不稳定,因为有关Binance 麻烦的谣言不断涌现。”

尽管美国CPI 报告积极且市场预期在很大程度上倾向于美联储不再加息等有利条件,但比特币价格仍下跌,可能是因为流动不足。

Kaiko 分析师Dessislava Aubert 在其报告中表示,2023 年第一季度,在美国银行业接二连三倒闭以及零手续费促销活动结束后,币安的交易量和流动性一直在稳步下降,结果是波动性增加,这导致比特币价格进一步下跌。

Aubert 写道:“我们已经从BTC最近突然的价格变动中看到了这一点,但冇有明确的催化剂,波动性不太可能消失,尤其是在一些较大的做市商(Jane Street 和Jump Crypto)透露他们正在减少美国的加密交易业务之后。”

美国的监管压力也在加大,比特币矿商Marathon Digital Holdings 最近收到了美国证券交易委员会的传票,这种监管不确定性增加了市场的复杂性,Oanda 分析师Ed Moya 在其推文中表示,在监管明确之前,比特币仍面临进一步的下行压力。

富达全球宏观总监:比特币“过热”了

富达全球宏观总监Jurrien Timmer 评论了比特币的走势,将其当前的市场动态与黄金的市场动态进行了比较。 Timmer 表示,比特币现在正以与黄金相同的节奏前进,但他警告BTC可能已经有点超前了,暗示其可能被高估至30,000 美元大关。

Timmer 在他的推文中强调,自2018年以来,比特币与两年期抗通胀债券实际收益率之间88% 的负相关,以及与PCE 衍生的实际利率63% 的负相关。这种相关性表明,比特币在对实际利率驱动因素的反应方面与黄金处于相似的位置。通俗地说,Timmer 暗示的是,比特币的价格往往会朝着这两个经济指标的相反方向移动。如果某些政府债券的回报率上升,或者通胀上升,我们可以预期比特币的价格普遍下跌,反之亦然。

Meme狂热消散,BTC上行受阻

Timmer 还指出了黄金和比特币回归模型的一个关键区别。黄金遵循线性回归,而比特币则呈指数增长。 Timmer 将此解释为比特币作为“强大的通胀对冲工具”的标志。这种强大的对冲潜力,加上它在投资者中的日益普及,使比特币成为一种极具吸引力的资产。但他对比特币潜在高估的警告强调了投资者谨慎的必要性,比特币价格目前已跌至3 月17 日以来的最低点,自5 月6 日以来跌幅超过12%,与纳斯达克等传统风险资产脱钩。

CEC Capital 加密货币顾问Laurent Kssis 分析道:“比特币周末可能会跌破26,000 美元,很明显,目前不再有基本面因素支撑BTC上涨

Letture associate

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbit1 h fa

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbit2 h fa

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbit2 h fa

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbit2 h fa

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片