由于 3 万美元的比特币价格成为关键战线,美联储所剩弹药所剩无几

Cointelegraph中文Published on 2023-05-05Last updated on 2023-05-05

Abstract

比特币价格在 5 月 2 日成功捍卫了 28,000 美元的支撑位,但尚未证明从 4 月 30 日起收回 29,200 美元水平所需的实力。

比特币价格在 5 月 2 日成功捍卫了 28,000 美元的支撑位,但尚未证明从 4 月 30 日起收回 29,200 美元水平所需的实力。

一些分析师将近期的下跌趋势归因于美联储将于 5 月 3 日加息的预期,但实际上,市场定价 92% 的可能性温和加息 25 个基点至自以来的最高水平2007 年 9 月。

正如市场情报平台Decentrader指出的那样,美联储主席杰罗姆鲍威尔的言论更有可能带来意外因素,要么指向进一步措施放缓经济,要么暗示最终利率接近5%的可能性更高。鲍威尔定于东部时间下午 2 点 30 分举行新闻发布会。

从就业角度看,央行有理由认为市场持续过热。美国政府报告称,3 月份每个失业工人有 1.6 个职位空缺。此外,根据 5 月 3 日发布的《ADP 全国就业报告》,4 月份民间就业岗位增加 29.6 万个,远高于市场预期的 14.8 万个。

然而,提高利率对家庭和小企业尤其有负面影响。融资和抵押贷款变得更加昂贵,而固定收益投资变得更具吸引力。这种抑制通货膨胀的不良影响可能会进一步动摇金融体系的核心,正如最近第一共和国银行倒闭所表明的那样。

价格突破 30,000 美元可能是投资者的看法从将比特币视为风险资产转变为直接受益于较弱的传统银行系统的稀缺数字资产的明确迹象。

但要衡量比特币在 28,000 美元上方的弹性是否可持续,投资者必须分析买家是否使用了过度杠杆,以及专业交易员是否使用BTC衍生品定价市场低迷的可能性更高。

比特币季度期货在鲸鱼和套利平台中很受欢迎。然而,这些固定月份合约的交易价格通常比现货市场略有溢价,表明卖家要求更多资金以延迟结算。

因此,健康市场中的期货合约应该以 5% 到 10% 的年化溢价交易——这种情况被称为期货溢价,这并不是加密市场独有的。

数据表明比特币交易员在过去几周格外谨慎。即使BTC价格在 4 月 26 日徘徊在 30,000 美元附近,也没有迹象表明对杠杆多头有需求。

此外,比特币期货溢价自 4 月 23 日以来一直停滞在 2% 附近,表明买家不愿使用杠杆,这对市场来说是健康的。通过避免期货合约敞口,它大大降低了比特币价格下跌期间大量清算的风险。

比特币期权市场也有助于解释最近的调整是否让投资者变得更加乐观。当套利柜台和做市商为上行或下行保护收取过高费用时,25% 的 delta 偏斜是一个明显的迹象。

简而言之,如果交易员预期比特币价格下跌,偏斜指标将升至 7% 以上,而兴奋阶段往往会有 7% 的负偏斜。

期权 delta 的 25% 偏斜表明过去四个星期看涨期权和看跌期权之间的需求平衡。鉴于比特币价格在 4 月 25 日至 4 月 30 日期间上涨了 10%,上次测试 30,000 美元阻力位时,这应该令人感到意外。

因此,比特币期权和期货市场表明,专业交易员不会在短期内将BTC价格突破 30,000 美元。另一方面,这些鲸鱼正在定价类似的意外正面和负面走势的可能性。

最终,鉴于美联储在不引发经济衰退的情况下加息显然有一个限度,无论 5 月 3 日的决定如何,比特币的价格都应该受到积极影响。

美联储主席鲍威尔最终将迫使美国财政部向经济注入更多资金以遏制银行业危机,这将有利于比特币等稀缺资产。

Related Reads

"Money Is Useless"? Why Musk's 2036 Prediction Could Completely Reshape Bitcoin's Fate

Elon Musk Predicts "Money Will Be Irrelevant" by 2036, Potentially Reshaping Bitcoin's Future In a recent interview with The Economist, billionaire Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, made a startling prediction: money will become "irrelevant" within a decade as the world transitions to a state of "unbelievable abundance." He argues that if robots and AI can provide goods and services exceeding all human consumption, the purpose of money would vanish. This prediction coincides with a critical juncture for Bitcoin. While the cryptocurrency has been trading sideways and below its all-time highs, it is approaching what some see as a major turning point. Musk's views are closely watched due to his past statements equating "energy" with true currency—a concept that resonates with Bitcoin proponents, as Bitcoin's security model is deeply tied to energy-intensive mining. His companies, SpaceX and Tesla, collectively hold nearly $2 billion worth of Bitcoin. Although Musk's public enthusiasm for crypto has moderated since its peak, he maintains support for Bitcoin and his favored Dogecoin. He has criticized government-issued fiat currencies as "hopeless" and suggested a preference for Bitcoin. His latest prophecy, envisioning a post-scarcity future driven by AI and robotics, refocuses attention on Bitcoin's potential role as a value anchor in a world where traditional money may lose its meaning.

Foresight News16m ago

"Money Is Useless"? Why Musk's 2036 Prediction Could Completely Reshape Bitcoin's Fate

Foresight News16m ago

Storj Labs Files for Bankruptcy Protection: Can Token Holders Exchange for Company Equity?

Storj Labs, parent company of decentralized cloud storage platform Storj, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on July 26 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. The company stated its network will operate normally and token functions will be unaffected. Notably, Storj plans to propose a mechanism in its reorganization plan allowing STORJ token holders a path to equity in the restructured company—an unprecedented offer in the crypto industry. However, its feasibility depends on whether any residual value remains after creditor repayments, as token holders are low in the legal priority hierarchy. Founded in 2014, Storj is an early decentralized infrastructure project. It reported a 7x increase in Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) to approximately $30 million in 2024. In October 2025, it was acquired by Inveniam Capital Partners. Less than a year later, the merged entity entered bankruptcy proceedings. Storj attributed the filing to historical debts from past operations and acquisitions, stating they were too large to be absorbed by business growth. The company also plans to refocus on its core decentralized storage business, likely divesting Valdi, a GPU computing company acquired in 2024. The proposed token-to-equity conversion faces significant legal hurdles. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, creditors are paid before equity holders, and utility token holders are not automatically recognized as equity members. The details—such as eligibility, allocation ratio, and mechanics—are yet to be determined and require court approval. Another factor is token concentration, with Storj Labs itself holding roughly 30% of the total 425 million STORJ supply. In the broader decentralized storage landscape, Storj is a smaller player compared to giants like Filecoin and Arweave. Its key advantage is faster retrieval speeds for "hot" data. The bankruptcy process introduces risks, including potential client and node operator migration to competitors. STORJ price fell roughly 11.2% following the news. Key points for token holders to watch are the specific terms of the equity conversion plan, court approval progress, the treatment of the company's own token stash, and whether the refocused core business can sustain value post-reorganization.

Foresight News20m ago

Storj Labs Files for Bankruptcy Protection: Can Token Holders Exchange for Company Equity?

Foresight News20m ago

Perpetual Futures 'Landing in the US' Hits Roadblock: Why is CME Suing the CFTC in Court?

Perpetual crypto futures, which dominate global crypto derivatives trading, are entering the U.S. market. The CFTC approved KalshiEX to launch a true Bitcoin perpetual contract (BTCPERP) and issued rules allowing licensed exchanges to convert expiring crypto futures into perpetual ones. This move was challenged when CME Group sued the CFTC, arguing that perpetuals should be regulated as "swaps" under stricter rules, not as futures. The lawsuit's outcome will significantly impact the legal foundation of the nascent U.S. perpetuals market. Currently, two legal structures exist in the U.S.: true perpetuals (like Kalshi's) and long-dated futures (like Coinbase's) that mimic perpetuals via frequent funding rate settlements. These funding rates, paid between longs and shorts, keep contract prices anchored to spot. The proliferation of U.S. perpetuals creates fragmented liquidity across platforms (Kalshi, Coinbase, CME), with different rules on leverage, margining, and clearing. This fragmentation reduces capital efficiency, as collateral cannot be shared across products. Key competitive battlegrounds will be cross-product margin efficiency and the response of these new markets to extreme volatility. A pending Coinbase proposal to allow USDC stablecoin as futures margin could improve capital efficiency. Ultimately, the market's evolution hinges on two factors: how U.S. perpetuals behave during sharp Bitcoin price moves, and the court's ruling on whether they are futures or swaps.

Foresight News20m ago

Perpetual Futures 'Landing in the US' Hits Roadblock: Why is CME Suing the CFTC in Court?

Foresight News20m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片