【重磅解读】BTC存量行情面临突破,ETH酝酿小双底

火必研究院Pubblicato 2022-06-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-06-11

Introduzione

BTC持续拉升,再次面临变盘选择。

1、BTC二次确认10日均线支撑

BTC在6月6日迎来技术反弹,本次反弹速度较快,持续时间较短,是对10日均线支撑的再次确认。因此,本次反弹值得投资者继续关注迎来机会。涨幅上,BTC还未脱离底部区域,价格在32000美元附近面临突破瓶颈。从短线表现机会看,上方60日均线对应的34815美元是比较重要的压力位,涨幅过程值得关注。其次,价格从35000美元到斐波那契50%对应的36077美元的压力更大一些,持币风险增强。

预期区间震荡阶段,重要价格震荡会在36000美元持续,近期持币获利预期增加。

2、主力抛压占比增长迅速

BTC在交易所的抛压影响价格走向,目前BTC在交易所的抛压增加,特别是主力抛压带来的影响不容忽视。数据上看,抛压前10的主力带来的影响占比提升到6月5日的0.779,抛压占比提升空间较大。同时,对比近期2022年的主力抛压变化,6页5日的主力抛压达到了年内最高峰值,对价格影响值得警惕。

考虑到BTC的价格上行缺乏更多交易量支撑,能否顺利摆脱底部多空纠缠,还需要进一步验证。

3、交易所交易占比低位运行

涉及交易所的硬币转账占整个网络硬币转账的比例越高,表明投资者积极使用交易所进行买卖,这个时候市场活跃度就会增高。该指标能够显著提示投资者的交易热情,数值上在6月5日达到了0.0212,意味着交易所占比依然较低。相比较2020年和2021年交易所占比为平均值0.15和0.08附近,目前交易所占比依然很低,意味着新增资金推动BTC的效果非常有限。整体来看,BTC虽然出现价格反弹,却依然为存量行情。

4、ETH价格横盘震荡

ETH没能对斐波那契61.8%对应的1910美元形成有效突破以前,任何反弹都很容易持续见顶回落表现。

目前ETH与BTC联动反弹,短线价格上涨速度较快,因此预期为小双底形态。价格趋势方面,ETH依然处在回落阶段,关键突破以前,才能验证进一步的买入信号。

1900美元下方为投资者定投低吸的理想位置,同时也是投资者长期的入市位置。

5、DOT波动收窄

与多数主流币一样,DOT短线跌幅收窄以后,波动率也出现降低迹象。目前来看,价格维持在三角形形态内部运行,同时与价格与前期2021年低点10.36美元接近,意味着价格走向有进一步突破的可能。从超跌角度分析,DOT低价运行期间交易量萎缩,行情处在变盘前夜。超跌反弹的预期增强,关注主流币短线运行方向。

Letture associate

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

The AI infrastructure (AI Infra) industry chain is facing unprecedented systemic bottlenecks, despite the rapid emergence of applications like DeepSeek and Seedance 2.0. The surge in global computing demand has exposed critical constraints across multiple layers of the supply chain—from core manufacturing equipment and data center cabling to specialty materials and cleanroom facilities. Key challenges include four major "walls": - **Memory Wall**: High-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM face structural shortages as AI inference demand outpaces training, with new capacity not expected until 2027. - **Bandwidth Wall**: Data transfer speeds lag behind computing power, causing multi-level bottlenecks in-chip, between chips, and across data centers. - **Compute Wall**: Advanced chip manufacturing, reliant on EUV lithography and monopolized by ASML, remains the fundamental constraint, with supply chain fragility affecting production. - **Power Wall**: While energy demand from data centers is rising, power supply is a solvable near-term challenge through diversified energy infrastructure. Expansion is further hindered by shortages in testing equipment, IC substrates (critical for GPUs and seeing price hikes over 30%), specialty materials like low-CTE glass fiber, and high-end cleanroom facilities. Connection technologies are evolving, with copper cables resurging for short-range links due to cost and latency advantages, while optical solutions dominate long-range scenarios. Innovations like hollow-core fiber and advanced PCB technologies (e.g., glass substrates, mSAP) are emerging to meet bandwidth needs. In summary, AI Infra bottlenecks are multidimensional, spanning compute, memory, bandwidth, power, and supply chain logistics. Advanced chip manufacturing remains the core constraint, while substrate, material, and equipment shortages present immediate challenges. The industry is moving toward hybrid copper-optical solutions and accelerated domestic supply chain development.

marsbit48 min fa

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

marsbit48 min fa

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbit1 h fa

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片