2026 Crypto Funding Reshuffle: Game and DePIN Are Dead, Prediction Market Duo Takes 18% of All Year's Funding with Two Deals

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-08

Introduzione

Cryptocurrency Funding in 2026: Gaming & DePIN Falter as Prediction Markets Dominate Data from the first four months of 2026 reveals a stark shift in crypto venture funding. The gaming and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) sectors have seen capital nearly dry up. In contrast, the "Consumer" category, led by two massive deals for prediction market platforms Kalshi ($1B) and Polymarket ($600M), captured a significant share. These two deals alone accounted for 18% of the year's total $8.65 billion raised and exceeded the combined funding of all 47 DeFi projects. Overall, the $8.65B across 305 deals is misleading. A March surge to $4.57B was largely due to two major acquisitions (BVNK at $1.8B and Kalshi). Excluding these, the underlying monthly funding rate is approximately $1B, indicating continued softness. The "Payments" and "Consumer" sectors together consumed 72% of all capital. Another notable trend is the rise of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), with 48 deals nearly matching the 57 seed-round investments. This signals a market pivot from funding new ideas to consolidating around established leaders. The most active investors so far in 2026 are Coinbase Ventures (18 deals), Tether (13 deals), Animoca Brands (11 deals), and GSR (11 deals). Notably, a16z's pace has slowed significantly compared to previous years.

Author:Memento Research

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide TechFlow Introduction: Crypto funding data for the first four months of 2026 reveals a harsh reality: the Game and DePIN sectors are nearly starved of capital, while Kalshi and Polymarket, two prediction market companies, have taken more money than all DeFi projects combined for the entire year. More alarmingly, the number of M&A deals has already matched seed rounds, indicating a shift in capital from betting on new ideas to acquiring existing leaders.

Funding Overview: March's Surge Was an Illusion

From January 1st to May 6th, 2026, the crypto industry completed 305 funding rounds, totaling $8.65 billion. However, the "surge" to $4.57 billion in March was actually just two massive M&A deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion and Kalshi's $1.0 billion.

Excluding these two deals, the real funding pace is about $1 billion per month, even weaker than at the end of 2025.

Capital Flow: Payments and Consumer Absorb 72%

By sector breakdown:

Payments: $3.74 billion (56 deals)

Consumer: $2.48 billion (35 deals)

DeFi: $1.06 billion (47 deals, the highest number of transactions)

The Payments and Consumer sectors combined account for 72% of the year's total funding. Funding for Game and DePIN has nearly vanished.

Prediction Markets Dominate the Consumer Sector

Two prediction market companies accounted for 18% of the year's total funding:

Kalshi: $1.0 billion

Polymarket: $600 million

These two deals totaling $1.6 billion exceed the sum of all 47 DeFi funding rounds.

M&A Becomes Mainstream

M&A deals reached 48 (accounting for 23% of known-stage transactions), nearly matching the 57 seed rounds (27%). This cycle has shifted from investing in new ideas in early stages to acquiring industry leaders.

Investor Rankings Reshuffled

Most active funds in 2026:

Coinbase Ventures: 18 deals (ranked second during 2021-26 period)

Tether: 13 deals (new top lead investor)

Animoca Brands: 11 deals (ranked first during 2021-26 period)

GSR: 11 deals

a16z: 7 deals (a significant drop compared to ~200 deals during 2021-26 period)

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, which two sectors took the majority of crypto funding in early 2026?

AThe Payments and Consumer sectors took the majority of crypto funding, together accounting for 72% of the total capital raised.

QWhat significant trend does the data reveal about mergers and acquisitions (M&A) compared to seed funding?

AThe data shows that M&A deals reached 48 (23% of known-stage deals), almost catching up to seed rounds at 57 deals (27%). This indicates a shift in the investment cycle from funding new ideas to acquiring established industry leaders.

QWhy was the spike in funding for March 2026 described as an 'illusion'?

AThe spike to $4.57 billion in March was largely an illusion because it was driven by just two mega-deals: an $1.8 billion acquisition of BVNK and a $1 billion deal with Kalshi. Removing these two transactions reveals a slower, more sluggish monthly funding pace of around $1 billion.

QHow did the funding for prediction market companies compare to the total funding for all DeFi projects in the period covered?

AThe two prediction market companies, Kalshi ($1 billion) and Polymarket ($600 million), together raised a combined $1.6 billion. This amount exceeded the total raised by all 47 DeFi projects, which was $1.06 billion.

QWhich investment firms were the most active in terms of deal count during early 2026, and how did this compare to their historical activity?

AIn early 2026, the most active investors by deal count were Coinbase Ventures (18 deals, historically ranked 2nd from 2021-26), Tether (13 deals, new top investor), Animoca Brands (11 deals, historically ranked 1st), GSR (11 deals), and a16z (7 deals, showing a significant decline from its historical ~200 deals between 2021-26).

Letture associate

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinist4 h fa

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinist4 h fa

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

Finance CEO Raoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin, citing its high throughput and low transaction costs as better suited for the future crypto-AI era. He believes Solana is ideal for machine-to-machine microtransactions and AI-driven DeFi activity, predicting AI agents will soon dominate DeFi users. While Bitcoin serves as a store of value, Pal sees higher growth in networks built for mass, automated transactions. This view was highlighted at Consensus 2026, where AI integration and crypto infrastructure were key themes.

bitcoinist4 h fa

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

bitcoinist4 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit5 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit5 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit6 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit6 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit7 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit7 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures