XRP Ledger Adds Military-Grade Security Via Payments Engine Standard

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-18

Introduzione

Ripple has published the first formal specification for the XRP Ledger’s Payment Engine, developed with formal methods firm Common Prefix. This document aims to provide a canonical reference for payment behavior and cross-asset transfers on the ledger, moving beyond empirical success to mathematical certainty. The initiative addresses the limitations of relying solely on the C++ codebase as the source of truth, which makes it difficult to distinguish intentional design from historical behavior. As the ledger prepares for more complex features—like lending, batch transactions, and decentralized exchange upgrades—this specification ensures clarity and safety. The specification focuses on the Payment Engine and plans to extend to the Consensus Protocol, described as non-negotiable for network safety. Ripple aims to create both human-readable reference and machine-verifiable models to enable formal verification by 2026. The goal is to shift from "code-as-truth" to "mathematics-as-truth," enhancing security and enabling advanced features. The XRP community has welcomed the announcement as a major step toward military-grade security and protocol reliability.

Ripple has published the first formal specification of the XRP Ledger’s Payment Engine, positioning it as a foundational upgrade for protocol safety as XRPL moves into a more feature-dense era. The document was released in partnership with formal methods firm Common Prefix and is intended to become a canonical reference for how payments and cross-asset value transfer behave on-ledger.

The motivation is straightforward, and Ripple does not sugarcoat it. XRPL has operated for more than a decade without downtime, but the team argues that a long track record is still not the same as provable correctness. In the DEV Community post published Dec. 17 under the RippleX Developers banner, the authors write that “to prepare the ledger for the next generation of complex features, we must move beyond empirical success to mathematical certainty.”

A Turning Point For XRP Ledger Security

That is the tone throughout: less victory lap, more engineering debt disclosure. For much of XRPL’s life, the C++ implementation (xrpld) has effectively acted as the only definitive source of truth for core behavior. Ripple’s post calls out a practical problem with that model: “The code tells us, in very precise C++ terms, what it does. It does not always tell us why.” In other words, when code is the spec, it becomes difficult to separate intentional design choices from historical behavior that simply persisted because nothing broke.

That gap starts to matter more as new amendments arrive. Ripple points directly to a pipeline of complex features — including lending, DEX-related work tied to Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs), batch transactions, and permissioned DEX concepts — and warns that the number of possible system states expands quickly as new modules “weave into the decades-old logic of the ledger.”

The published specification is hosted on GitHub and labeled as work in progress, but it is already framed as a serious technical artifact: “a technical specification document intended for developers implementing or verifying XRPL payment system behavior.” It also spells out the heart of the system in plain language: the Payment Engine is what “figures out how value should travel and then carries out those moves,” enabling payments to draw across “trust lines, MPTs, order books, AMMs, and direct XRP.”

The deeper point, though, is what this enables next. Ripple’s post lays out a two-part target. First, a human-readable specification that reduces ambiguity and becomes the canonical reference for builders and researchers. Second, a machine-verifiable model — a mathematical representation of the spec — that can support mechanical proofs about system properties and whether proposed changes violate core safety guarantees.

It is also explicit about scope discipline. Ripple argues that specifying the entire ledger in one shot is not realistic: “It would be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming to specify the entire system at once.” So the work focuses on what it describes as the two most critical and complex components: the Payment Engine and the Consensus Protocol.

Consensus, in particular, is framed as non-negotiable infrastructure. Ripple describes it as “the heart of the ledger,” adding: “Its correctness is non-negotiable and underpins the safety and liveness of the entire network.”

The stated objective is to formally model the mechanism to prove properties such as liveness, safety, and finality. On timing, Ripple is clear that this is the starting line, not the finish. After publishing the Payment Engine specification, the team says it intends to begin formal verification work on the Payment Engine and the Consensus Protocol in 2026.

The closing line captures the direction of travel: “The shift from code-as-truth to mathematics-as-truth is underway.”

In the XRP community, the announcement landed with predictable euphoria. “Absolute freaking game changer! ... Aerospace & military grade security incoming,” wrote XRPL validator and community member Vet, adding: “The XRP Ledger is receiving its first formal specification for the payments engine. By mathematically specifying key protocol components [...] Basically, this is the enabler for the endboss of audits AND for other things like complex features or client diversity.”

At press time, XRP traded at $1.83.

XRP falls below support zone, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of Ripple publishing the first formal specification of the XRP Ledger's Payment Engine?

AThe main purpose is to provide a foundational upgrade for protocol safety, moving beyond empirical success to mathematical certainty, and to serve as a canonical reference for how payments and cross-asset value transfer behave on-ledger as the XRPL introduces more complex features.

QWhich two critical components does Ripple's specification work focus on, and why?

AThe work focuses on the Payment Engine and the Consensus Protocol because specifying the entire ledger at once would be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. These are described as the two most critical and complex components, with consensus being non-negotiable infrastructure that underpins the entire network's safety and liveness.

QWhat practical problem does Ripple identify with having the C++ code (xrpld) as the only definitive source of truth?

AThe code precisely tells what it does in C++ terms but does not always explain why, making it difficult to separate intentional design choices from historical behavior that simply because nothing broke, which becomes a greater issue as new amendments and complex features are added.

QWhat are the two parts of Ripple's target for the XRP Ledger specification?

AFirst, a human-readable specification that reduces ambiguity and becomes the canonical reference for builders and researchers. Second, a machine-verifiable model—a mathematical representation—that can support mechanical proofs about system properties and whether proposed changes violate core safety guarantees.

QWhen does Ripple intend to begin formal verification work on the Payment Engine and Consensus Protocol?

ARipple intends to begin the formal verification work on the Payment Engine and the Consensus Protocol in 2026.

Letture associate

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit59 min fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit59 min fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 h fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 h fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 h fa

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1 h fa

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Cosa è XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nuova Frontiera nel Paesaggio delle Criptovalute Introduzione a XRP 2.0 Nel mondo in continua evoluzione delle criptovalute, nuovi progetti emergono continuamente, cercando attenzione e adozione. Una tale iniziativa promettente è XRP 2.0, un nuovo progetto di criptovaluta progettato per sfruttare avanzate tecnologie blockchain e metodologie di crittografia robuste. Anche se il nome richiama alla mente l'XRP di Ripple, è fondamentale notare che XRP 2.0 opera in modo indipendente, concentrandosi sul miglioramento della sicurezza delle transazioni, della privacy e della scalabilità. Mentre il panorama finanziario digitale abbraccia sempre di più soluzioni decentralizzate, XRP 2.0 mira a contribuire in modo significativo al web3 e all'espansione generale dei progetti crypto. Cos'è XRP 2.0? Alla sua base, XRP 2.0 è un progetto di criptovaluta che mira a creare un ecosistema di valuta digitale sicuro e decentralizzato. La sua tecnologia fondamentale integra principi di blockchain sofisticati con tecniche di crittografia all'avanguardia. L'obiettivo principale di XRP 2.0 è quello di affermarsi come una piattaforma affidabile ed efficiente in grado di consentire un'esecuzione rapida delle transazioni, dando priorità a migliori protezioni della privacy per i suoi utenti. Il progetto è promosso come una soluzione a molte limitazioni affrontate dalle criptovalute esistenti, proponendo un sistema in grado di gestire un volume maggiore di transazioni con migliorata velocità e privacy. Questa versatilità pone XRP 2.0 come un significativo competitor in un mercato affollato di varie valute digitali. Chi è il Creatore di XRP 2.0? L'identità del creatore dietro XRP 2.0 è stata segnalata come 'Wilbur'. Tuttavia, i dettagli completi riguardanti Wilbur o l'entità associata rimangono sfuggenti. L'anonimato di molti creatori di criptovalute non è un fenomeno raro nel settore, spesso progettato per mantenere un certo grado di privacy e sicurezza. Chi sono gli Investitori di XRP 2.0? Al momento, informazioni specifiche relative alle fondazioni o organizzazioni di investimento a supporto di XRP 2.0 non sono disponibili pubblicamente. Nel settore delle criptovalute, il supporto di investitori rinomati può influenzare significativamente la credibilità e il successo di un progetto, tuttavia la trasparenza riguardo ai sostenitori finanziari di XRP 2.0 non è stata stabilita. Come Funziona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 si distingue per l'impiego di una combinazione di tecnologia blockchain e algoritmi di crittografia avanzati che garantiscono transazioni sicure e decentralizzate. La sua struttura innovativa include caratteristiche uniche progettate per promuovere il coinvolgimento degli utenti e ampliare le funzionalità oltre le transazioni convenzionali delle criptovalute. Tra queste caratteristiche, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacità alimentate da intelligenza artificiale, come funzionalità di testo in immagini e testo in voce. Queste aggiunte sono progettate per migliorare l'esperienza interattiva per gli utenti, promuovendo una maggiore applicabilità in vari settori. Unendo progressi tecnologici con design incentrati sugli utenti, XRP 2.0 mira a catturare l'attenzione di una vasta gamma di individui e aziende che cercano di integrare soluzioni di criptovaluta nei loro framework operativi. Cronologia di XRP 2.0 Comprendere XRP 2.0 richiede di esaminare i traguardi che hanno definito il suo percorso fino ad ora: 23 luglio 2023: XRP 2.0 viene introdotto come un nuovo progetto di criptovaluta, mirante a rivoluzionare le capacità di transazione sicura e decentralizzata nel dominio blockchain. 8 settembre 2023: Si verifica il lancio di un altro progetto, XRP20, marcando l'emergere di un token ERC-20 sulla blockchain di Ethereum che resta non correlato a XRP 2.0. 13 novembre 2023: Il ledger XRP subisce un significativo aggiornamento con il rilascio della versione 2.0.0 del software server rippled. È essenziale notare che questo sviluppo è scollegato dal progetto di criptovaluta XRP 2.0. Punti Chiave su XRP 2.0 Per distillare l'essenza di XRP 2.0, emergono diversi fattori critici: Caratteristiche Uniche: L'inclusione di funzionalità come il testo in immagini e testo in voce alimentato da intelligenza artificiale diversifica ulteriormente le potenziali applicazioni di XRP 2.0. Tecnologia Blockchain: Il framework utilizza meccanismi blockchain avanzati e protocolli di crittografia, garantendo un ambiente sicuro e decentralizzato per le transazioni. Scalabilità e Privacy: XRP 2.0 dà priorità a migliori protezioni della privacy nei processi di transazione e alla scalabilità necessaria per accogliere una base di utenti in crescita. Nessuna Affiliazione con Ripple: È importante notare che, nonostante il suo nome, XRP 2.0 non ha alcuna fedeltà o collaborazione con l'XRP di Ripple, distinguendo il proprio framework operativo e obiettivi all'interno dell'ecosistema delle criptovalute. Conclusione XRP 2.0 rappresenta un'ambiziosa venture nell'ambito delle criptovalute, mirante a offrire una combinazione di sicurezza, privacy ed efficienza nelle transazioni digitali. Integrando tecnologie sofisticate e caratteristiche user-friendly, il progetto si propone di ampliare gli orizzonti di ciò che le criptovalute possono realizzare nell'economia digitale odierna. Sebbene l'anonimato del suo creatore e la mancanza di investitori dichiarati possano sollevare domande per alcuni, il focus di XRP 2.0 su funzionalità avanzate e decentralizzazione ne amplifica l'appeal in un mercato crypto sempre più affollato. Man mano che il panorama delle criptovalute continua a evolversi, XRP 2.0 potrebbe emergere come un attore decisivo nell'espansione di soluzioni blockchain sicure e scalabili.

166 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.04.05Aggiornato il 2024.12.03

Cosa è XRP 2.0

Come comprare XRP

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di XRP (XRP) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente XRPXRP.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva XRP (XRP)Dopo aver acquistato XRP (XRP), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia XRP (XRP)Scambia facilmente XRP (XRP) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

1.5k Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare XRP

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di XRP XRP sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片