XRP buy signal flashes as funding rate turns deeply negative: Will bulls step in?

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-11

Introduzione

XRP's price declined 9% after being rejected at $2.18, with its funding rate turning deeply negative to -20%, indicating strong bearish dominance in derivatives markets. Open interest remains stagnant at $2.8 billion, well below recent highs. Declining activity in US-listed XRP ETFs, with daily volumes rarely exceeding $30 million, and a drop in XRP Ledger TVL to $68 million—its lowest in 2025—further reduce institutional and ecosystem interest. With limited on-chain activity and no clear catalysts for a rebound, near-term bullish momentum for XRP appears unlikely.

Key takeaways:

XRP derivatives are dominated by bears as the funding rate turned deeply negative, and open interest remains stagnant.
XRP ETF volumes and declining XRP Ledger TVL show fading interest in the XRP ecosystem, reducing the chances of a near-term price rebound.

XRP (XRP) fell 9% over two days after being rejected at $2.18 on Tuesday. The slide below $2 created brief turmoil in derivatives markets as the cost of holding leveraged bearish positions jumped to a two-month high. Traders worry that XRP could weaken further given the slowdown in exchange-traded fund (ETF) activity and the decline in XRP Ledger deposits.

*XRP perpetual futures annualized funding rate. Source:* *laevitas.ch*

The funding rate on XRP perpetual futures fell to -20% on Thursday, the lowest since the Oct. 10 crash. Negative readings indicate that sellers (shorts) pay buyers (longs) to maintain open positions, signaling a near-total lack of demand from bullish traders. In more balanced conditions, the rate typically ranges from 6% to 12% to account for the cost of capital, with longs covering that fee.

Such deeply negative funding rates are rare and usually short-lived. Some analysts even view them as potential reversal signals, though most historical examples emerged during flash crashes rather than extended corrective phases. In addition, falling appetite for leverage has led some to question whether traders have simply stepped back from XRP.

*XRP futures aggregate open interest, USD. Source: CoinGlass*

Aggregate open interest in XRP futures stood at $2.8 billion on Thursday, unchanged from the prior week. Still, leveraged positions have not recovered the $3.2 billion level seen in late November. The data suggests XRP bears are reluctant to increase exposure, especially after the token has already dropped 45% since reaching $3.66 in July.

Declining XRP ETF activity and fading TVL on XRP Ledger

Part of the muted appetite for bullish XRP positions can be tied to declining activity in the US-listed XRP ETFs. Traders entered November with strong expectations, but inflows and trading activity dropped sharply after just three weeks, leaving assets under management stuck near $3.1 billion, according to CoinShares data. For comparison, Solana ETFs hold $3.3 billion in assets.

*US-listed XRP ETF daily volumes on Dec. 11, USD. Source: CoinGlass*

Daily volume on US-listed XRP ETFs rarely exceeds $30 million, which significantly dampens interest from institutional desks. Fading demand for the XRP Ledger is another source of frustration for holders. Even the Ripple-backed stablecoin Ripple USD (RLUSD) relies primarily on the Ethereum network rather than XRP’s infrastructure.

*Ripple USD (RUSD) in circulation per blockchain. Source: DefiLlama*

More than $1 billion worth of RLUSD has been issued on Ethereum, compared with just $235 million on the XRP Ledger. More concerning, TVL on the XRP Ledger has dropped to its lowest level of 2025 at $68 million, signaling declining engagement with the chain’s decentralized applications (DApps). In contrast, the Stellar blockchain holds $176 million in TVL, despite XLM’s market capitalization being 93% smaller than XRP’s $121.8 billion.

Related: XRP price may grow ‘from $2 to $10’ in less than a year–Analyst

XRP remains under pressure as competing blockchains such as BNB Chain and Solana continue to strengthen their positions in the DApps ecosystem. The limited activity on XRP Ledger creates a reinforcing cycle in which investors have fewer incentives to hold XRP, especially when compared with the native staking yields available on BNB and SOL.

So far, there is no clear evidence that any pickup in XRP Ledger activity would translate into direct benefits for XRP holders.

XRP derivatives point to increased confidence among bears, while onchain metrics and ETF flows show fading interest, particularly from institutional investors. As a result, the odds of sustained bullish momentum for XRP appear low in the near term.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as, legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Letture associate

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

Collateral Dollars: How Does a "Second Layer of Dollars" Form on Top of Stablecoins? Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollar functions, expanding the offshore dollar system. However, stablecoins primarily replace specific functions like operational dollar balances for settlement. They do not inherently create new dollar credit; they substitute existing claims. The key question is: what happens when financial intermediaries use stablecoins as collateral to create a new layer of dollar-denominated claims? This "collateral dollar" channel operates through secured lending, not direct money creation. A money-like event only occurs when a liability issued against the controlled stablecoin is funded, rolled over, or accepted at near-par value by another balance sheet. The discount (haircut) prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility to bank dollars." Elasticity stems not from the stablecoin itself but from the liability issued against it and the willingness of third-party balance sheets to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Compared to the traditional Eurodollar system—where elasticity originates from bank deposit creation—the stablecoin collateral chain is structurally different. Eurodollar deposits are credit-expansive from inception. Stablecoins are initially substitutive; elasticity emerges later if an intermediary's liability against them gains monetary acceptance. Stablecoins disrupt specific tiers of the offshore dollar system, mainly replacing operational settlement balances. They do not replace the need for full dollar balance-sheet capacity (credit lines, hedging, maturity transformation). For systemic impact, the second-layer liability must pass three tests: transferability, funding capacity, and monetary acceptance (being fundable or held at par by others). Pressure transmission also differs. In the Eurodollar system, stress moves up a hierarchy of claims. In a stablecoin collateral chain, the second-layer liability can lose its money-like status well before the underlying stablecoin faces a run, often triggered by haircut increases and margin calls that create a dynamic spiral of falling token prices and rising discounts. In conclusion, the "collateral dollar" is not the stablecoin itself. It is the second-layer liability issued against a controlled token balance that is willing to be funded and maintained at near-par value. Its existence depends on that liability surviving the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity."

marsbit7 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

marsbit7 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

"Collateralized Dollars: How a 'Second Layer of Dollars' Forms on Top of Stablecoins" Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollars and expand the offshore dollar system, but this is not accurate. Stablecoins primarily replace certain functions within the existing system, especially operational dollar balances for daily settlement. The critical question is what happens when financial intermediaries create a new layer of dollar claims *on top of* stablecoins. This article explains how this new collateralized funding channel works. Stablecoins introduce tokenized private dollar claims. Even if issuers and reserves are within the US legal perimeter, their circulation and use as collateral can become economically "offshore." Enforceable control over collateral opens a secured credit channel but does not itself create a monetary claim. A true monetary event occurs only when another balance sheet funds, rolls over, or accepts a liability issued against the controlled token at near-par value. The discount prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility into bank dollars." Elasticity comes from the balance sheet issuing the liability against the token and from third-party willingness to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Collateralized Dollars are not the stablecoins themselves; they are the second-layer liability that another balance sheet is willing to issue, fund, and maintain at near-par against a controlled token balance. The Eurodollar system is a hierarchy of claims, with elasticity originating in expandable bank liabilities. In contrast, the stablecoin collateral chain starts with a tokenized asset. It gains systemic significance only when an intermediary's liability against that token is treated as money-like by other balance sheets. Key determining factors include: who has effective control, the legal/operational path to bank dollars, and whether the resulting claim can still be financed near-par under stress. Pressure in this new channel manifests differently. The upper-layer (intermediary) claim fails first, losing its money-like status, potentially while the underlying stablecoin remains solvent. Increased haircuts and forced sales can create a destructive feedback loop, widening the very gap the discount measures. In conclusion, the Eurodollar analogy has limits. Reserve quality supports the underlying token's solvency, but the leverage, credit, and liabilities built atop it face a separate test. Collateral eligibility is not monetary acceptance. Only when a claim built on stablecoins survives the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity" do Collateralized Dollars truly exist.

链捕手13 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

链捕手13 min fa

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25B Cap: Strategy's Three-Tier Bitcoin Sales Plan Hides Massive Potential Selling Pressure Strategy recently sold 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to fund a dividend and replenish its dollar reserve, while claiming its $1.25B "reserve build" capacity remains fully available. This highlights a key nuance: the widely cited $1.25B limit applies only to sales for "Building" the reserve. Strategy's broader capital framework, however, allows Bitcoin sales for three primary purposes, each with different scales: 1. **Building the Reserve:** Selling BTC to raise up to $1.25B for the reserve. 2. **Covering Priority Share Expenses:** Selling BTC to pay dividends/interest or to replenish the reserve after such payments are made from it (no specified limit). 3. **Share Repurchase Funding:** Selling BTC to fund up to $1B each in convertible note and common stock repurchases (totaling $2B potential). Combined, just the capped "Build" and "Repurchase" channels could facilitate over $3B in Bitcoin sales, excluding the uncapped "Cover Expenses" channel. The accounting distinction between "Building" (adding cash before a payout) and "Replenishing" (adding cash after a payout) is operationally blurry but allows sales like the recent $216M transaction without touching the $1.25B "Build" quota. This gives Strategy significant flexibility. The move signifies a strategic shift: Strategy is transforming from a simple Bitcoin accumulator into an active capital manager, akin to a hedge fund. Bitcoin is now a financial lever to balance pressures between common stock, convertible notes, dollar reserves, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates inherent tensions—actions benefiting one part of the capital structure may harm another. Investors must understand that the potential Bitcoin sales are far greater than the surface-level $1.25B figure. Strategy has become a complex financial entity where every term in its disclosures matters. Betting on it now is a wager on its active capital management skill to navigate these internal contradictions without a systemic failure.

Foresight News20 min fa

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Foresight News20 min fa

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy, once the largest corporate buyer of Bitcoin, sold 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million to fund its preferred stock dividends, marking a significant shift from buyer to seller. This move occurred after its market-to-NAV premium vanished, breaking its "print stock to buy Bitcoin" financial model. A roundtable discussion featuring Austin Campbell, Ram Ahluwalia, and Chris Perkins analyzed the implications. They noted that MicroStrategy's dominance has become a narrative bottleneck for the broader crypto market, with some speculating that Bitcoin's price might only surge significantly after the company's influence wanes. The conversation expanded to examine the capital structure conflict between traditional equity and crypto tokens, arguing that most current tokens will fail as they don't fit neatly into existing debt/equity frameworks. A "stablecoin war" was identified as a major trend, with entities like Tether, Robinhood, and the OUSD alliance competing. Tether's decision to abandon the European MiCA market highlights strategic divergences. The panelists argued that bank-issued stablecoins could revolutionize global finance by allowing US banks to capture net interest margins from international transactions, potentially making JPMorgan the first trillion-dollar bank. They concluded that while capital is currently being siphoned by AI/semiconductors, markets will eventually refocus on fundamentals and cash flow, which could benefit cryptocurrencies with real utility.

marsbit27 min fa

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

marsbit27 min fa

Bitcoin’s path to $80K may hinge on THIS hidden trend

Bitcoin's potential path toward $80,000 is influenced by conflicting market signals. Data shows the Coinbase Bitcoin Premium Index has recorded its longest-ever streak of consecutive negative premiums, indicating muted institutional demand or net selling from U.S. institutions. While such a trend often signals short-term weakness, it doesn't necessarily forecast a long-term bear market. Additionally, a bearish crossover occurred in Bitcoin's Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL), with its short-term average falling below the longer-term average, suggesting declining investor profitability and waning market momentum. Historically, major bear market bottoms saw the 100-day NUPL drop below zero, but this cycle it remains positive, implying either an unprecedented bottom or a further decline is needed. Currently trading around $63,148, Bitcoin has seen weekly gains but remains below its May peak. Technical indicators present a mixed picture: the MACD shows bullish momentum, while the RSI signals bearish pressure. A positive development is the return of inflows to Bitcoin ETFs after eight weeks of outflows. Analysts hold divergent views; some highlight a key liquidity zone between $48,000-$50,000 where a market bottom could form, while others maintain a more optimistic long-term outlook. Ultimately, while some bullish signs exist, a strong push from institutional investors appears crucial for Bitcoin to challenge the $80,000 level.

ambcrypto1 h fa

Bitcoin’s path to $80K may hinge on THIS hidden trend

ambcrypto1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Cosa è XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nuova Frontiera nel Paesaggio delle Criptovalute Introduzione a XRP 2.0 Nel mondo in continua evoluzione delle criptovalute, nuovi progetti emergono continuamente, cercando attenzione e adozione. Una tale iniziativa promettente è XRP 2.0, un nuovo progetto di criptovaluta progettato per sfruttare avanzate tecnologie blockchain e metodologie di crittografia robuste. Anche se il nome richiama alla mente l'XRP di Ripple, è fondamentale notare che XRP 2.0 opera in modo indipendente, concentrandosi sul miglioramento della sicurezza delle transazioni, della privacy e della scalabilità. Mentre il panorama finanziario digitale abbraccia sempre di più soluzioni decentralizzate, XRP 2.0 mira a contribuire in modo significativo al web3 e all'espansione generale dei progetti crypto. Cos'è XRP 2.0? Alla sua base, XRP 2.0 è un progetto di criptovaluta che mira a creare un ecosistema di valuta digitale sicuro e decentralizzato. La sua tecnologia fondamentale integra principi di blockchain sofisticati con tecniche di crittografia all'avanguardia. L'obiettivo principale di XRP 2.0 è quello di affermarsi come una piattaforma affidabile ed efficiente in grado di consentire un'esecuzione rapida delle transazioni, dando priorità a migliori protezioni della privacy per i suoi utenti. Il progetto è promosso come una soluzione a molte limitazioni affrontate dalle criptovalute esistenti, proponendo un sistema in grado di gestire un volume maggiore di transazioni con migliorata velocità e privacy. Questa versatilità pone XRP 2.0 come un significativo competitor in un mercato affollato di varie valute digitali. Chi è il Creatore di XRP 2.0? L'identità del creatore dietro XRP 2.0 è stata segnalata come 'Wilbur'. Tuttavia, i dettagli completi riguardanti Wilbur o l'entità associata rimangono sfuggenti. L'anonimato di molti creatori di criptovalute non è un fenomeno raro nel settore, spesso progettato per mantenere un certo grado di privacy e sicurezza. Chi sono gli Investitori di XRP 2.0? Al momento, informazioni specifiche relative alle fondazioni o organizzazioni di investimento a supporto di XRP 2.0 non sono disponibili pubblicamente. Nel settore delle criptovalute, il supporto di investitori rinomati può influenzare significativamente la credibilità e il successo di un progetto, tuttavia la trasparenza riguardo ai sostenitori finanziari di XRP 2.0 non è stata stabilita. Come Funziona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 si distingue per l'impiego di una combinazione di tecnologia blockchain e algoritmi di crittografia avanzati che garantiscono transazioni sicure e decentralizzate. La sua struttura innovativa include caratteristiche uniche progettate per promuovere il coinvolgimento degli utenti e ampliare le funzionalità oltre le transazioni convenzionali delle criptovalute. Tra queste caratteristiche, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacità alimentate da intelligenza artificiale, come funzionalità di testo in immagini e testo in voce. Queste aggiunte sono progettate per migliorare l'esperienza interattiva per gli utenti, promuovendo una maggiore applicabilità in vari settori. Unendo progressi tecnologici con design incentrati sugli utenti, XRP 2.0 mira a catturare l'attenzione di una vasta gamma di individui e aziende che cercano di integrare soluzioni di criptovaluta nei loro framework operativi. Cronologia di XRP 2.0 Comprendere XRP 2.0 richiede di esaminare i traguardi che hanno definito il suo percorso fino ad ora: 23 luglio 2023: XRP 2.0 viene introdotto come un nuovo progetto di criptovaluta, mirante a rivoluzionare le capacità di transazione sicura e decentralizzata nel dominio blockchain. 8 settembre 2023: Si verifica il lancio di un altro progetto, XRP20, marcando l'emergere di un token ERC-20 sulla blockchain di Ethereum che resta non correlato a XRP 2.0. 13 novembre 2023: Il ledger XRP subisce un significativo aggiornamento con il rilascio della versione 2.0.0 del software server rippled. È essenziale notare che questo sviluppo è scollegato dal progetto di criptovaluta XRP 2.0. Punti Chiave su XRP 2.0 Per distillare l'essenza di XRP 2.0, emergono diversi fattori critici: Caratteristiche Uniche: L'inclusione di funzionalità come il testo in immagini e testo in voce alimentato da intelligenza artificiale diversifica ulteriormente le potenziali applicazioni di XRP 2.0. Tecnologia Blockchain: Il framework utilizza meccanismi blockchain avanzati e protocolli di crittografia, garantendo un ambiente sicuro e decentralizzato per le transazioni. Scalabilità e Privacy: XRP 2.0 dà priorità a migliori protezioni della privacy nei processi di transazione e alla scalabilità necessaria per accogliere una base di utenti in crescita. Nessuna Affiliazione con Ripple: È importante notare che, nonostante il suo nome, XRP 2.0 non ha alcuna fedeltà o collaborazione con l'XRP di Ripple, distinguendo il proprio framework operativo e obiettivi all'interno dell'ecosistema delle criptovalute. Conclusione XRP 2.0 rappresenta un'ambiziosa venture nell'ambito delle criptovalute, mirante a offrire una combinazione di sicurezza, privacy ed efficienza nelle transazioni digitali. Integrando tecnologie sofisticate e caratteristiche user-friendly, il progetto si propone di ampliare gli orizzonti di ciò che le criptovalute possono realizzare nell'economia digitale odierna. Sebbene l'anonimato del suo creatore e la mancanza di investitori dichiarati possano sollevare domande per alcuni, il focus di XRP 2.0 su funzionalità avanzate e decentralizzazione ne amplifica l'appeal in un mercato crypto sempre più affollato. Man mano che il panorama delle criptovalute continua a evolversi, XRP 2.0 potrebbe emergere come un attore decisivo nell'espansione di soluzioni blockchain sicure e scalabili.

189 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.04.05Aggiornato il 2024.12.03

Come comprare XRP

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di XRP (XRP) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente XRPXRP.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva XRP (XRP)Dopo aver acquistato XRP (XRP), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia XRP (XRP)Scambia facilmente XRP (XRP) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

1.6k Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di XRP XRP sono presentate come di seguito.