World Liberty Financial Offers ‘Guaranteed Direct Access’ For $5M Token Lockup

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-14

Introduzione

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a DeFi venture linked to the Trump family, has introduced a new "Super Node" program requiring investors to lock $5 million worth of tokens for six months. In return, participants receive "guaranteed direct access" to certain WLFI team members and gain voting rights in governance matters. Although Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Barron Trump are listed as part of the supporting team, they will not be included in the direct access offering. The proposal passed with 99% approval from 1,786 votes. Super Nodes must stake 50 million WLFI tokens and will earn a 2% yield in tokens for participating in at least two votes. This move shifts from earlier promises of democratized access by restricting voting rights to large stakeholders. Separately, Trump will host another exclusive dinner for TRUMP memecoin holders. WLFI’s token price rose nearly 6% to $0.1079 amid a broader crypto market recovery.

The Trump family’s decentralized finance (DeFi) venture, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), unveiled on Friday a new investment opportunity for participants and supporters of the platform.

As earlier reported by Reuters, investors who commit to locking $5 million worth of their tokens for six months will gain “guaranteed direct access” to certain members of the WLFI team in exchange for voting rights.

World Liberty Financial Introduces ‘Super Nodes’

This new initiative includes family members of President Trump among the “Supporting Team” listed in World Liberty’s documentation. Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Barron Trump are all mentioned, though the company has clarified that they will not be part of the direct access arrangement.

Voting on this proposal closed on Thursday, with the company claiming that 99% of the 1,786 votes cast were in favor of the new arrangement.

The introduction of a tiered structure for token holders, referred to as “Super Nodes,” represents a shift from the company’s earlier commitment to democratizing access to financial resources.

David Wachsman, the company’s spokesman, clarified that while Super Nodes will have access to the WLFI team, it does not guarantee a partnership. Instead, it suggests that significant participation in governance will be encouraged.

According to World Liberty’s website, this initiative aims to incentivize token holders to engage more actively in the governance of the crypto firm, which generated over $460 million for the Trump family in the first half of 2025.

Exclusive Dinner For TRUMP Memecoin Holders

To become a Super Node, investors must stake 50 million WLFI tokens. By staking their tokens for six months, holders will not only gain voting rights on governance matters but also earn a yield of 2% in WLFI tokens for participating in at least two votes.

Previously, all WLFI token holders enjoyed the ability to vote on alterations to the company’s underlying code, with each token representing one vote. They could also express their opinions on the venture’s strategic directions, as outlined in World Liberty’s Gold Paper.

However, with the passage of this new proposal, voting rights will now be restricted to those who have staked their tokens for the designated period, further limiting access to crucial governance processes.

In a related development, Bitcoinist reported that President Trump is preparing to host the second exclusive dinner for holders of his official memecoin, TRUMP, scheduled for April 25 at Mar-a-Lago.

The daily chart shows WLFI’s uptick witnessed on Friday. Source: WLFIUSDT on TradingView.com

At the time of writing, World Liberty Financial’s native token, WLFI, is trading at $0.1079. This represents gains of almost 6% over the last 24 hours, as the wider cryptocurrency market has experienced a significant recovery ahead of the end of the week.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the minimum token lockup amount and duration required to gain 'guaranteed direct access' in World Liberty Financial's new initiative?

AInvestors are required to lock up $5 million worth of WLFI tokens for a period of six months.

QWhich members of the Trump family are mentioned as part of the 'Supporting Team' but will not be included in the direct access arrangement?

AEric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Barron Trump are mentioned as part of the 'Supporting Team' but are excluded from the direct access arrangement.

QWhat are the two main benefits for investors who become a 'Super Node' by staking 50 million WLFI tokens?

AThe two main benefits are gaining voting rights on governance matters and earning a yield of 2% in WLFI tokens for participating in at least two votes.

QHow did the voting on the new 'Super Node' proposal turn out, according to the company?

AThe company claimed that 99% of the 1,786 votes cast were in favor of the new arrangement.

QWhat was the price and 24-hour performance of the WLFI token at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, the WLFI token was trading at $0.1079, representing a gain of almost 6% over the previous 24 hours.

Letture associate

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinist1 h fa

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1 h fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2 h fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2 h fa

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit2 h fa

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures