World Gold Council Proposes “Gold as a Service” Framework Impacting Tokenized Gold Market

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-20

Introduzione

The World Gold Council has introduced a "Gold as a Service" framework aimed at modernizing the global tokenized gold infrastructure. This system connects physical gold custody with digital issuance, enabling more efficient creation of gold-backed products. It is structured around three core components: physical custody, digital issuance, and synchronization systems that link assets to blockchain records. The framework is expected to impact major market players like Tether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG), which currently dominate the tokenized gold sector but operate on fragmented systems. By introducing standardized processes for custody, compliance, and redemption, the initiative seeks to unify the market, improve regulatory alignment, and reduce operational costs. This development is seen as a significant step in merging traditional gold markets with blockchain technology, potentially driving greater adoption among institutional investors and fintech companies. The Council emphasized that the framework is designed to foster future growth rather than target existing issuers.

The World Gold Council created a “Gold as a Service” framework to help modernize tokenized gold infrastructure worldwide. It does this by connecting physical gold custody and digital issuance systems, allowing companies to issue gold-backed products more efficiently. It is built on three levels of physical custody, digital issuance, and synchronization systems that connect assets and blockchain records.

Source: World Gold Council

The World Gold Council CEO, David Tait, said, “Financial services are undergoing a rapid and pervasive digital transformation.” He further added that shared infrastructure would help in improving accessibility, tradability, and integration of gold in modern financial systems worldwide.

Impact on Tether Gold and Paxos Gold Market Leaders

Currently, Tether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG) currently dominate the overall tokenized gold market. Also, they collectively command a large market share in the overall market worldwide. Both of these operate on different systems for custody, audit, and redemption, and this is causing fragmentation in the overall digital gold market worldwide.

The new framework also outlines a set of standardized processes that include custody coordination, compliance checks, and redemption systems that are to be followed on all platforms globally. Such a framework would ensure that all platforms are aligned in terms of regulatory compliance. It has been noted that such a platform can enable hundreds of new issuances to happen in a more efficient manner.

The Potential and Development Mark

The platform can potentially lead to lower operational costs as well as better integration between tokenized gold assets on various blockchain platforms globally. This can further increase adoption rates among institutional investors as well as fintech companies that are entering the tokenized commodity space. Officials emphasized that the platform focuses on enabling growth. Rather than targeting existing issuers in the space.

The development marks a significant convergence between traditional gold markets and blockchain technology as the adoption of digital assets continues to gain momentum globally. Analysts noted that tokenized gold can act as a major growth driver in traditional gold markets globally.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ondo Finance Expands Tokenized Securities Offering With BlackRock IBIT and Galaxy Digital

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the 'Gold as a Service' framework proposed by the World Gold Council?

AThe main purpose is to modernize tokenized gold infrastructure worldwide by connecting physical gold custody and digital issuance systems, allowing companies to issue gold-backed products more efficiently.

QWhich two products currently dominate the tokenized gold market according to the article?

ATether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG) currently dominate the tokenized gold market.

QWhat are the three levels that the 'Gold as a Service' framework is built upon?

AIt is built on three levels: physical custody, digital issuance, and synchronization systems that connect assets and blockchain records.

QWhat benefits does the World Gold Council CEO believe shared infrastructure will bring to gold?

ADavid Tait believes shared infrastructure will help improve accessibility, tradability, and integration of gold in modern financial systems worldwide.

QHow can the new framework potentially impact operational costs and adoption rates?

AThe framework can lead to lower operational costs and better integration, which can further increase adoption rates among institutional investors and fintech companies entering the tokenized commodity space.

Letture associate

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinist6 h fa

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinist6 h fa

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

Finance CEO Raoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin, citing its high throughput and low transaction costs as better suited for the future crypto-AI era. He believes Solana is ideal for machine-to-machine microtransactions and AI-driven DeFi activity, predicting AI agents will soon dominate DeFi users. While Bitcoin serves as a store of value, Pal sees higher growth in networks built for mass, automated transactions. This view was highlighted at Consensus 2026, where AI integration and crypto infrastructure were key themes.

bitcoinist7 h fa

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

bitcoinist7 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit7 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit7 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit9 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit9 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit9 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit9 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures