WLFI’s $0.106 under siege: Should traders brace for more losses?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-24

Introduzione

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has been trading within a three-month range between $0.106 and $0.175 but is currently under pressure at the lower support level of $0.106. The token experienced a bounce to $0.13 recently, however, bearish momentum persists as indicated by the RSI rejection at the 50 level and declining buying volume. The short-term price target is expected to test the $0.96–$0.99 demand zone. A coordinated attack on its stablecoin, USD1, caused a brief depeg, though it has since recovered. Despite the bearish outlook, a short squeeze toward $0.13 remains possible if bulls defend the $0.96 level and Bitcoin’s downward momentum eases.

World Liberty Financial [WLFI] formed a top around the $0.18 supply zone in late December. Since then, it has faced steady distribution, and the price was back at the $0.106 long-term support.

The World Liberty Forum convened financial and crypto leadership at Mar-a-Lago. It was hosted by Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., and focused on tokenization strategy and capital-market integration.

Rapper Nicki Minaj was a featured speaker at the event, where WLFI announced plans to tokenize revenue from Maldives resort loans, according to reports.

More recently, the USD1 came under a “coordinated attack“, with the stablecoin briefly slipping below its $1 peg. The company reassured users that the depeg attempt failed and USD1 was trading at par once more.

Bearish WLFI trend set to continue

The Congressional investigation and forced market-wide selling in the first week of February saw WLFI drop below a three-month range. This range extended from $0.106 to $0.175. At the time of writing, the lows were under siege once again.

The range lows were defended in recent weeks, and a bounce to $0.13 occurred. The bulls had no follow-up to this relief rally. The price action, volume trends, and the OBV showed that the buyers had exhausted themselves over the past week.

The bounce to $0.13 saw the RSI retest neutral 50 and face rejection. This underscored the bearish momentum prevalent on the 1-day timeframe.

The $0.966 local lows are likely to be tested in the coming days.

Short-term WLFI prediction

The short-term range lows just under $0.1 were likely to be tested soon. The $0.96-$0.99 was the nearby local demand zone that beckoned prices closer.

The long liquidations under the current market price agreed that the next move was likely to be bearish. However, the liquidation heatmap also highlighted the dense cluster of short liquidations at $0.13.

If WLFI bulls defend $0.96 and the Bitcoin [BTC] bearish momentum sees temporary respite, traders need to be prepared for a short squeeze to, or just beyond, $0.13.

Final Summary

The World Liberty Financial token was trading within a 3-month range.
Analysis of the lower timeframe trends showed that $0.96 was the immediate price target.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current long-term support level for WLFI mentioned in the article?

AThe current long-term support level for WLFI is $0.106.

QWhat significant event did World Liberty Financial host at Mar-a-Lago and who were the hosts?

AWorld Liberty Financial hosted the World Liberty Forum at Mar-a-Lago, which was hosted by Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., focusing on tokenization strategy and capital-market integration.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the immediate price target for WLFI?

AThe immediate price target for WLFI is $0.96, as it is the nearby local demand zone.

QWhat does the article suggest could cause a short squeeze in WLFI's price?

AThe article suggests that if WLFI bulls defend $0.96 and Bitcoin's bearish momentum sees temporary respite, a short squeeze to or beyond $0.13 could occur.

QWhat was the reason given for WLFI's price dropping below its three-month range in early February?

AWLFI dropped below its three-month range due to a Congressional investigation and forced market-wide selling in the first week of February.

Letture associate

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbit1 h fa

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbit1 h fa

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 h fa

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 h fa

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbit1 h fa

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbit1 h fa

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbit2 h fa

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbit2 h fa

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 h fa

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare WLFI

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Official World Liberty FinancialWLFI.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI)Dopo aver acquistato Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI)Scambia facilmente Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

437 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.09.01Aggiornato il 2025.09.01

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di WLFI WLFI sono presentate come di seguito.