‘Win-win-win’: Coinbase CEO backs April deadline for CLARITY Act

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-19

Introduzione

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Senator Bernie Moreno are pushing for the stalled CLARITY Act to pass by April 2026, framing it as a "win-win-win" for the crypto industry, traditional banks, and American consumers. The main dispute centers on whether stablecoins should offer rewards, which banks opposing due to fears of deposit outflows. Armstrong, who had previously withdrawn support over regulatory concerns, now believes a compromise is achievable. Political timing is critical, with Moreno aiming to pass the bill before the 2026 midterms slow progress. Polymarket odds for passage have surged to 90%, indicating growing optimism. The effort is positioned as part of a broader push to advance crypto policy under the Trump administration.

At Mar-a-Lago this week, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Senator Bernie Moreno signaled a possible comeback for the stalled CLARITY Act.

Speaking at the World Liberty Forum, they pushed back against claims that the crypto industry blocked the bill, with Armstrong framing the earlier setback as a strategic pause to secure better protections for Americans.

Meanwhile, traditional banks are lobbying to remove stablecoin rewards from the bill. Against this backdrop, the CNBC appearance of Armstrong and Moreno shows that the debate is no longer just about technical rules.

It has become a larger fight over the future of finance in the U.S.

Coinbase CEO says CLARITY Act is close to approval

The duo believes there is now a real chance for the CLARITY Act to pass by April 2026.

Remarking on the same, Armstrong said,

“We are going to get this across the finish line, hopefully by April.”

Earlier this year, Armstrong withdrew his support because he was concerned about the SEC’s role and limits on stablecoins. Now, he says a compromise is possible.

Providing further insight on the why, Armstrong added,

“There’s now a path forward where we can get a win-win-win outcome here. A win for the crypto industry, a win for the banks, and a win for the American consumer to get President Trump’s crypto agenda through to the finish line.”

Reasons behind the delay in approval

As it’s now established, the main dispute in the bill is whether stablecoins should be allowed to offer rewards or interest. Banks fear that higher returns from stablecoin wallets will pull money out of savings accounts and weaken deposits.

However, Moreno rejects this view, arguing that people should not have to protect banks and that competition will force them to offer better rates. He also supports faster payments, including daily wages instead of the usual twice-a-month cycle.

Meanwhile, politics is also affecting the bill’s timeline. With the 2026 midterms approaching, Moreno wants it passed by April before election season slows progress.

He doubts Democrats will regain the House, citing voter frustration over inflation and border issues.

Moreno said,

“The Democrats only have one idea, which is hatred of President Trump. And that’s not a very good idea in terms of actually advancing the lives of working Americans.”

Yet, both he and Armstrong praised the Trump administration for actively pushing crypto policy forward.

Polymarket data shows further optimism

This further coincided with Polymarket odds surging to 90% for passage in 2026. This shows growing confidence that the legislative deadlock is finally easing.

Still, getting the bill to President Trump’s desk will be a race against time and will require strong cooperation between different committees.

As Patrick Witt outlined, the bill’s journey is now a matter of procedural endurance rather than just conceptual debate. To reach the finish line before the November 2026 midterms, several critical steps remain.

Final Summary

The April target is forcing faster negotiations and limiting political delay tactics.
Lawmakers are positioning the bill as a win for everyday Americans, not just crypto firms.

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the new deadline for the CLARITY Act that Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is backing?

AApril 2026.

QAccording to the article, what is the main point of dispute in the CLARITY Act?

AWhether stablecoins should be allowed to offer rewards or interest.

QWhy do traditional banks oppose the inclusion of stablecoin rewards in the bill?

ABanks fear that higher returns from stablecoin wallets will pull money out of savings accounts and weaken their deposits.

QWhat does Senator Bernie Moreno believe competition from stablecoins will force traditional banks to do?

AHe argues that competition will force banks to offer better rates to consumers.

QAccording to the Polymarket data mentioned in the article, what are the odds that the CLARITY Act will pass in 2026?

AThe odds have surged to 90% for passage in 2026.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit4 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit4 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit6 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit6 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手7 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手7 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit8 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare WIN

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di WINkLink (WIN) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente WINkLinkWIN.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva WINkLink (WIN)Dopo aver acquistato WINkLink (WIN), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia WINkLink (WIN)Scambia facilmente WINkLink (WIN) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

337 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di WIN WIN sono presentate come di seguito.