Why XRP isn’t moving despite $1.2B in ETF demand

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-22

Introduzione

Despite over $1.2 billion in inflows into XRP spot ETFs and consistent institutional demand, the price of XRP has remained relatively stagnant, trading near $1.94. This price action occurs alongside a notable increase in accumulation by large wallets (whales), whose supply has climbed back toward 12.8%. Technical indicators show the asset trading below key moving averages, with RSI at 43 and low buying pressure. The convergence of institutional and whale activity suggests a shift in market control and positioning for a potential future move, even though a bullish price breakout has not yet occurred.

Who holds the power in XRP? Lately, institutional money has moved in, and big wallets are also trying to take control again. And get this! This is all happening with price action that isn’t anything to write home about.

Here’s what you need to know.

ETFs set the tone

Spot XRP ETFs’ inflows have pushed total net assets past $1.2 billion. Even on mellow days, inflows have remained positive. The interest looks extremely consistent (though muted), rather than like a one-off spike.

The trend is interesting, though. Even with the big streak of green, Ripple’s [XRP] price has held near $1.90 instead of reacting impulsively. That’s a big buying sign, with institutions building exposure gradually to set a base.

Whales have some skin in the game

Santiment data indicated that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have begun increasing their share again. Whale supply has climbed back toward the 12.8% range after a brief decline earlier this month.

The move hasn’t been gradual. After dipping in mid-December, large-holder ownership spiked, so holding isn’t passive. They’re positioning.

When whales step in alongside institutional inflows, it means market control is shifting hands.

XRP is trying to steady itself

At the time of writing, XRP traded near $1.94, still below its key exponential moving averages (EMAs). The 20, 50, 100 and 200-day EMAs remained overhead, so the greater trend hadn’t yet flipped bullish.

That hesitation is visible in the momentum as well.

RSI was at around 43, with mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. OBV has also flattened after falling earlier in the month.

That means selling has reduced with no new demand. The MACD was below zero, too, though downside momentum appeared to be slowing.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP price is flat near $1.90, but $1.2B+ in ETF assets and rising whale supply mean holders aren’t deterred.
  • Control is shifting, even without a price breakout.

Domande pertinenti

QDespite over $1.2 billion in ETF inflows, why hasn't XRP's price shown significant movement?

AThe article suggests that institutional money is building exposure gradually to set a base, which is a form of strategic accumulation rather than impulsive buying. This consistent but muted interest, combined with the fact that XRP's price is still below its key exponential moving averages, has resulted in a lack of strong upward price momentum.

QWhat does the recent activity of large XRP wallets (whales) indicate?

AData from Santiment shows that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have increased their share, with whale supply climbing back to around 12.8%. This spike in large-holder ownership after a mid-December dip indicates they are actively positioning themselves, not just passively holding.

QWhat do the technical indicators (RSI, OBV, MACD) reveal about XRP's current market momentum?

AThe RSI was around 43, showing mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. The On-Balance Volume (OBV) has flattened after a previous decline, indicating that selling has reduced but there is no new demand. The MACD was below zero, though its downward momentum appeared to be slowing.

QHow is 'market control' in the XRP ecosystem changing according to the article?

AMarket control is shifting as both institutional investors (via consistent ETF inflows) and large wallet holders (whales) are increasing their positions. This coordinated activity means that power is consolidating among these larger players, even though the price has not yet broken out.

QWhat is the overall sentiment of holders despite the flat price action near $1.90?

AHolders are not deterred. The significant ETF assets exceeding $1.2 billion and the rising supply held by whales demonstrate strong conviction and a long-term positioning strategy, suggesting confidence in XRP's future despite the current lack of price movement.

Letture associate

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit35 min fa

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit35 min fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2 h fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare T

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Threshold Network Token (T) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Threshold Network TokenT.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Threshold Network Token (T)Dopo aver acquistato Threshold Network Token (T), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Threshold Network Token (T)Scambia facilmente Threshold Network Token (T) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

411 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare T

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di T T sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片