Why Do Chinese Memes Lack Staying Power?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-01-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-13

Introduzione

Chinese meme coins on BSC experienced a brief surge in early January 2026, led by tokens like “我踏马来了” (I’m F*cking Coming) and “老子” (Laozi), but quickly lost momentum within days. The rally, initially sparked by a tweet from He Yi (Binance co-founder), reflected a recurring pattern within the BSC ecosystem—dubbed “Shandongology”—where meme tokens gain traction through perceived endorsements from CZ or He Yi, even without direct involvement. This culture has led to growing community fatigue and internal division. Many participants expressed resistance to what they see as excessive sycophancy, undermining cohesion and diverting attention from organic meme culture. Unlike the October 2025 wave, which attracted global interest and cross-chain engagement, this surge failed to gain significant traction outside Chinese-speaking communities, limiting liquidity and buyer diversity. Moreover, Chinese meme coins are no longer novel. While they’ve become a recurring category within crypto, their reliance on “Shandongology” and lack of independent cultural identity make them highly susceptible to short-lived hype cycles. Tokens that fail to evolve beyond influencer-driven narratives tend to fade quickly, reinforcing a “pump-and-dump” pattern that shortens each meme cycle.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web 3_golem)

"The two-day on-chain bull run is over"—this is the prevailing sentiment in the Meme community today.

Following the surge in October last year, Chinese Meme coins once again sparked a frenzy on BSC in January this year, giving rise to many community-favored tokens (related reading:From "Life K-Line" to "Laozi", a rundown of the top 5 hottest BSC "Chinese Memes"). However, according to GMGN data today, popular Chinese Memes have generally seen pullbacks. Within 24 hours, "I'm F*cking Coming" dropped by 30%, "Laozi" fell by 25%, "Life K-Line" declined over 20%, and "Manager Xiao Ni" plunged over 40%.

Every feast eventually ends, and Memes cool down particularly quickly. Last October, the Chinese Meme hype started during the National Day holiday and lasted a full month before fading. But this time, it ended so abruptly. What exactly went wrong?

Rejection of "Shandong-ology" Undermines Community Unity

This round of Chinese Meme hype was cold-started from a tweet by He Yi. On January 1st, He Yi posted on X with the caption "2026, I'm f*cking coming" to celebrate the New Year. A week later, the同名 Meme coin began to gain traction, eventually listing on Binance Alpha and igniting the Chinese Meme community.

However, along with this came widespread discussion in the community about "Crypto Shandong-ology: which way does the fish head face?"—pointing directly to a整套 Meme launch model on BSC revolving around CZ and He Yi. CZ and He Yi don’t need to personally direct or even know about these tokens; from developers to the community to the Binance alpha team, everyone automatically "gets enlightened." The fate of a Meme is decided by a single tweet.

In February 2025, CZ首次 interacted with a worthless on-chain test token TST on BSC, marking the雏形 of this Meme launch model on BSC. After subsequent small-cycle iterations like the dispute over CZ’s dog and the Dubai narrative, the community figured out the "social nuances" necessary for a BSC Meme hype cycle from cold start to peak.

To make money in such an ecosystem, put politely, one must learn from the top and the excellent; put bluntly, one "absolutely cannot stand upright."

"Is it really different this time?" As this Chinese Meme wave peaked again, countless bloggers asked on social media. This wasn’t just mere meme-ing; it genuinely reflected the psychological shadow left by this "Crypto Shandong-ology" since 2025.

When enough shadows accumulate, they form rejection. Some criticized the BSC ecosystem for going to any lengths to "suck up," blindly截取 content from CZ and He Yi’s tweets, even giving birth to tokens like "Mom," "Dad," and "Laozi," making Chinese Memes increasingly tacky.

Previously, Odaily Planet Daily also analyzed the community debate sparked by "I'm F*cking Coming" listing on Binance Alpha, calling it "a serious blow to genuine Chinese Meme culture" (related reading: How to evaluate the listing of "I'm F*cking Coming" on Binance?).

When rejection of "Crypto Shandong-ology" becomes widespread, searching for community Meme coins without the CZ/He Yi angle itself became a community force. Crypto blogger Honest Mai总 (X:@Michael_Liu93)直言, "Everyone is really tired of sucking up." (The blogger holds 1% of "Life K-Line" tokens)

Regardless, such division ultimately harms the unity of the BSC Meme community. Capital cannot form a合力. When a community-consensus leader fails to emerge quickly, Meme sentiment rapidly dissipates.

Lack of External Liquidity

To sustain a small Meme cycle, there must be price increases, and to sustain increases, there must be new buying pressure exceeding selling pressure. A possible reason for the lack of staying power in this Chinese Meme wave is the absence of external liquidity injection. The market cap was primarily driven up by the Chinese community on BSC, without attracting buying from overseas communities or the Solana Meme community.

The Chinese Meme hype last October had an unprecedented reach. Many overseas Meme influencers sought help on X to join Chinese Meme communities; "Dagou WeChat groups" suddenly saw an influx of English-speaking degens. This wave also prompted other chains to court the Chinese Meme community: Base chain lead Jesse invited the community to build on Base, while Solana founder Toly and Solana Foundation president Lily Liu fueled the hype for the Solana Chinese Meme "Suolala."

This influence溢出 from the wealth effect of Chinese Meme coins translated into tangible on-chain buying power, prolonging the duration of the October hype.

But the January Chinese Meme hype lacked this externality, still revolving around CZ and He Yi’s tweets. The only Chinese Meme with some externality, "Life K-Line" (reportedly covered by CCTV on January 3rd), had its spotlight quickly overshadowed after "I'm F*cking Coming" listed on Alpha.

One piece of this lack of external liquidity: using language filters on X to search for posts and views about recent hot Chinese Memes (e.g., I'm F*cking Coming, Laozi, Small Shareholder) in English-speaking regions shows that, aside from exchange listing announcements with high views, discussion of these Memes in English is scarce.

Hot posts about "Laozi" in the X English section are all exchange listing announcements

Chinese Memes Themselves Are No Longer Novel

A乒乓球 dropped from a height always bounces back lower each time.

Chinese Memes themselves are no longer a sufficiently attractive narrative.

Odaily Planet Daily asserted at the end of October last year that although the October Meme hype ended, Chinese Memes themselves would not die out but would become a fixed Meme category, with periodic hype cycles in the future. (Related reading:After Binance Life, Chinese Memes Evolve from Hits to a Sector)

This also means that if a Meme coin merely has a Chinese ticker and some "position-determines-view" logic for rising, it is destined not to last.

Since last October, the only Chinese Meme coins with lasting vitality are Binance Life and Hachimi. Tokens like Customer Service Xiao He, Cultivation, and Nailong have vanished into history. The representative Memes in this wave were all strongly tied to the "Shandong-ology" of CZ and He Yi and failed to develop an independent culture beyond the "Two Saints'" halo. Thus, they are注定 to lack the生命力 to survive beyond small Meme cycles, like any previous similar token (theoretically, Life K-Line doesn't belong here; its popularity was essentially sparked by the CCTV article).

When the Chinese Meme narrative first emerged, a Chinese Meme coin could rise simply due to novelty. Now, Chinese Memes have become an unremarkable, fixed category. As Chinese Memes fully integrate into the BSC Meme cycle assembly line, and as the market becomes increasingly familiar with this playbook, the ecosystem reverts to a "speed run" mode. The entire Meme cycle accelerates: cold start via "imperial decree," baiting continued interaction, listing on Binance Alpha, and finally, dumping...

This round of Chinese Memes is just a microcosm of that.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the main reasons mentioned for the lack of staying power of Chinese Meme coins in the recent cycle?

AThe main reasons include community division due to rejection of the 'Shandong School' dynamics (excessive reliance on CZ and He Yi's influence), lack of external liquidity from international or Solana communities, and the diminished novelty of Chinese Meme narratives as a category.

QHow did the 'Shandong School' concept affect the cohesion of the BSC Meme community?

AThe 'Shandong School' concept, which revolves around creating Meme coins based on CZ and He Yi's social media activity, caused community division. Some participants rejected this sycophantic culture, leading to fragmented consensus and reduced collective buying power, which weakened the Meme cycle's sustainability.

QWhy was external liquidity important for previous Chinese Meme booms, and how did it differ in January?

AExternal liquidity, from international or cross-chain communities, provided additional buying pressure that extended the duration of previous booms (e.g., October 2025). In January, the lack of such external engagement, with minimal discussion in English-speaking communities, resulted in quicker exhaustion of the hype.

QWhat role did Binance Alpha play in the recent Chinese Meme cycle?

ABinance Alpha listings, such as for '我踏马来了' (I'm Coming), acted as a catalyst by amplifying visibility and legitimacy. However, it also intensified community debates over the 'Shandong School' and centralized influence, contributing to the cycle's rapid decline.

QHow has the perception of Chinese Meme coins evolved over time?

AInitially, Chinese Meme coins benefited from novelty and freshness, attracting broad interest. Over time, they became a standardized category within BSC's Meme cycles, losing their unique appeal. The market now operates in a 'pump and dump' mode, with accelerated cycles due to familiarity with the playbook.

Letture associate

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

Summary: This article examines the significant losses recently suffered by cryptocurrency traders and influencers who ventured into the stock market, specifically by heavily investing in AI-related and semiconductor storage stocks. The narrative centers on the dramatic reversal in the Korean and US equity markets in late July, with stocks like SK Hynix and related leveraged ETFs experiencing historic plunges, erasing massive gains. The analysis highlights several key factors behind the "flip." Traders, accustomed to crypto's high volatility and frustrated by a stagnant market, chased the apparent momentum in AI-themed equities. Many made fatal mistakes: applying high-leverage strategies common in crypto (e.g., 2x ETFs, on-chain perpetual contracts) to stocks, and failing to understand the distinct rules of different stock markets (like Korean pre-market trading). This led to widespread liquidations, especially when a thin Korean pre-market trade triggered a cascading flash crash on a decentralized exchange. Post-crash reflections from prominent figures reveal deep regret and self-criticism. They acknowledge misjudging their expertise, overestimating their edge against sophisticated institutional players, and the dangers of leverage. The article concludes that while such setbacks are part of trading, surviving long-term requires recognizing one's limitations and the inherent risks of cross-market strategies.

marsbit51 min fa

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

marsbit51 min fa

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片