Why Base’s $15.2B trading boom raises questions about L2 tokens

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

Base is shifting its focus from creator rewards and social features to prioritize trading, as evidenced by the shutdown of its Creator Rewards program and Farcaster-powered social feed. The program, which distributed around $450,000 to 17,000 creators over seven months, is being discontinued to allow the platform to concentrate on tradable assets. This strategic pivot raises questions about the potential role of a native Base token, especially since discussions about its launch have quieted recently. The network's strong performance suggests a token may not be necessary. Over the past 30 days, Base-linked DEXs processed $15.2 billion in trading volume, with Aerodrome Finance (AERO) leading much of the activity. The network has also generated $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue, demonstrating its ability to monetize usage directly without relying on a token for growth. Coinbase's recent Super Bowl ad further indicates a focus on brand building and streamlined priorities. With trading volume and fees effectively serving the function a token typically would, a native Base token appears optional rather than essential.

The Base app is dropping creator rewards and moving its focus on trading, which says a lot about where Coinbase sees traction today.

But that raises an important question. What role, if any, will a native Base token play, especially since talk of launching one has gone noticeably quiet in recent months?

Putting trading first

Coinbase is shutting down the app’s Creator Rewards program and its Farcaster-powered social feed, with its focus now on tradable assets. The Creator Rewards initiative, launched in July, was designed to encourage posts and engagement by paying users for activity.

In practice, the payouts were modest. Base says around $450,000 was shared among roughly 17,000 creators over seven months, averaging about $26 per person.

Source: X

According to creator Jesse Pollak, the decision came down to focus. As the app evolved, the team realized it worked best when it did fewer things well. He stated,

“…as we’ve rolled the app out, we’ve realized we need to do less, better. and by focusing on tradable assets, that’s exactly what we can do.”

The Creator Rewards program will officially end this week, with final payouts scheduled for the 18th of February. Pollak also noted that Base App was never an ideal home for Farcaster’s social feed, and expects most users to return to Farcaster’s native app.

Importantly, the changes do not affect Base’s Creator Coins feature, which remains active.

AMBCrypto previously reported that Coinbase was considering launching a native token called BASE, and that it was likely to happen this year. However, there’s not been much talk on that front since.

Do they really need a native token, though?

For now, it looks like they don’t.

Source: DeFiLlama

Over the past 30 days, Base-linked DEXs have processed $15.2 billion in trading volume, with Aerodrome Finance [AERO] alone accounting for the bulk of that activity. That puts them ahead of many multi-chain competitors.

Source: Token Terminal

More importantly, the network is generating real money. Data per Token Terminal showed that Base has earned $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue to date, with steady weekly inflows.

Instead of relying on a token to bootstrap growth, Base is already monetizing usage directly.

Source: Twitter

In more recent news, this year’s Super Bowl featured just one major crypto ad, and it was from Coinbase. The streamlining of priorities makes sense as Coinbase seemingly looks to build a bigger brand.


Final Thoughts

  • Base is prioritizing trading and revenue, with volume and fees doing the work a token usually would.
  • With growth already monetized, a native Base token looks optional rather than necessary.
Next: Cardano: Why CME’s ADA futures sparked 3% drop instead of a rally
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Domande pertinenti

QWhy is Base shutting down its Creator Rewards program and social feed?

ABase is shutting down these features to focus on doing fewer things well, specifically by concentrating on tradable assets, as the team realized the app works best with a more streamlined approach.

QHow much trading volume have Base-linked DEXs processed in the past 30 days?

ABase-linked DEXs have processed $15.2 billion in trading volume over the past 30 days, with Aerodrome Finance (AERO) accounting for the bulk of that activity.

QWhat is the current status of a potential native Base token launch?

ATalk of launching a native Base token has gone noticeably quiet in recent months, and with the network already generating significant revenue through fees, a token now seems optional rather than necessary.

QHow much revenue has Base generated from fees to date?

ABase has earned $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue to date, according to data from Token Terminal.

QWhat does Base's shift in focus and recent performance suggest about the need for a Layer 2 native token?

ABase's strong trading volume and revenue generation demonstrate that it can monetize usage directly without relying on a native token for growth, making a token launch appear optional rather than essential.

Letture associate

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn1 h fa

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn1 h fa

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit2 h fa

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit2 h fa

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit2 h fa

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片