Who Are the Real Winners in the 'Tokenization' Narrative?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-20

Introduzione

The article explores the real beneficiaries of the tokenization narrative and concludes that nearly everyone stands to gain, though the timing, reasons, and mechanisms differ significantly. Retail investors benefit through democratized access, as tokenization removes systemic barriers that previously excluded them from high-yield assets like private credit. They can now invest with small amounts, trade 24/7, access global assets, and use programmable capital in DeFi strategies. Issuers gain from faster, cheaper, and broader fundraising. Tokenization reduces settlement times from weeks to minutes, lowers operational costs through smart contracts, and enables innovative product designs like tranched risk products and dynamic yield mechanisms. Institutions are drawn to tokenization for its operational efficiencies: near-instant settlement (T+0) reduces counterparty risk, frees up capital, and cuts costs. Major players like BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs are already implementing tokenized solutions for these advantages. Infrastructure builders—such as custodians, compliance providers, and data oracles—are positioned to become the foundational layer of a multi-trillion-dollar market, akin to "picks and shovels" in a gold rush. Emerging markets experience a transformative impact, as tokenization and stablecoins offer financial inclusion to billions. They provide access to dollar-denominated assets, inflation-resistant savings, low-cost remittances, and real-time payrol...

I discussed this topic last week, and Andy from Rollup also raised related questions. Everyone keeps asking: Who are the real beneficiaries of real-world asset tokenization?

The real answer is: Almost everyone benefits, but the reasons, timing, and underlying logic are completely different.

Retail Investor Perspective: From Spectators to Participants

For decades, retail investors have been systematically excluded from high-yield assets. Not because the assets are too complex, but because the traditional financial system is designed for large amounts of capital, accredited investors, and inefficient clearing—small investments simply aren't cost-effective.

Tokenization doesn't just lower the barrier; it dismantles the entire system that creates barriers.

Consider what it's like for retail investors to invest in private credit now:

· Minimum investment typically $250K–$1M

· Must be an accredited investor

· Lock-up period of 3–7 years

· Almost no secondary market

· Completely at the mercy of fund managers

Once such a fund is tokenized:

· Fractional ownership: Invest with $100, not $1M. Smart contracts solve the high cost of managing small amounts.

· 7×24 trading: No market open/close times, no clearing windows, no waiting for bank transfers.

· Globally accessible: Retail investors in Lagos, Jakarta, and São Paulo can buy the same tokenized treasury fund as those in Manhattan.

· Composability: Tokenized assets are programmable capital. They can be used as loan collateral, in vault strategies, or transferred across platforms—no broker needed.

Deeper insight: Retail investors gain not just "cheaper access to the same things," but a whole new set of financial behaviors.

Within an afternoon, one can hold tokenized U.S. Treasuries, use them as collateral to borrow stablecoins, and then deploy them into yield strategies—all self-custodied, without calling a wealth manager.

Before tokenization, retail investors were spectators in the global capital markets. After tokenization, they become participants. The difference is immense.

Issuer Perspective: Faster Funding, Broader Channels, Lower Costs

For issuers, the logic is simple: Tokenization enables faster funding, lower costs, and an exponentially larger investor base. Every issuer cares about these three points, and tokenization delivers on all of them.

The shift from traditional issuance to tokenized issuance:

· Traditional settlement takes weeks to months; tokenization completes in minutes to hours.

· Traditional methods require custodians, transfer agents, brokers, and clearinghouses; tokenization uses smart contracts for distribution, compliance, and clearing.

· Traditional methods are limited by geography, regulation, and minimums; tokenization is global, 7×24, and accessible with small amounts.

· Traditional manual reconciliation, quarterly reports, and shareholder registry upkeep are extremely costly; tokenization enables automated reporting, on-chain transparency, and real-time data.

· Traditional product structures are rigid; tokenization supports tiered design, flexible redemptions, and dynamic yield mechanisms.

A traditional private credit fund typically serves 50–200 institutions, with a fundraising round taking months. A tokenized fund can serve thousands of investors: compliance is programmable, account opening is digital, and the barrier is extremely low—retail investors, small family offices, and crypto-native institutions can all participate.

Tokenization also enables entirely new product design capabilities:

· Creating tiered products with different risk/return profiles within a single smart contract

· Flexible daily/weekly/monthly redemptions, executed automatically by code

· Dynamic yield mechanisms based on on-chain data

· Hybrid products combining fixed income with DeFi yields

These are too costly to implement in traditional finance but are simple in a tokenized system.

Institutional Perspective: Clearing, Transparency, Structural Risk Reduction

Institutions don't care about crypto concepts or decentralization ideals. What they are truly obsessed with is: counterparty risk, operational costs, reporting accuracy, and regulatory compliance.

And tokenization offers quantifiable improvements in every one of these areas. This is why top global financial institutions are all entering the space.

The current financial system operates on at least T+2 settlement. This means that for two days after a trade:

· Counterparty default risk persists

· Capital is tied up and cannot be reused

· Reconciliation, margin, and collateral management are extremely complex

Tokenization makes settlement nearly instantaneous (T+0). This alone can:

· Release vast amounts of capital tied up in settlement cycles

· Eliminate counterparty risk during the settlement period

· Greatly reduce reliance on back-end systems like clearinghouses and central counterparties

This transformation could bring about potential annual efficiency gains of approximately $2.4 trillion globally. By 2030, conservative short-term annual gains are estimated between $31 billion and $130 billion.

Major players already in action:

· BlackRock launched the tokenized money market fund BUIDL, with over $1 billion in assets

· Franklin Templeton put fund shares on-chain via BENJI

· J.P. Morgan built the Onyx platform for tokenized repo and collateral management

· Goldman Sachs, HSBC, UBS, Citi are all piloting or building tokenization infrastructure

They're not in it because blockchain is trendy, but because it's cheaper, faster, and lower risk.

Infrastructure Builder Perspective: The "Pickaxe Sellers" in a Trillion-Dollar Market

In every major transformation, the winners are those who build the infrastructure. The picks in the gold rush, the servers for the internet, AWS for cloud computing.

Real-world asset tokenization is building a new financial infrastructure. The companies that get it right will become the underlying pipes for a market exceeding $11 trillion.

Essential modules for this ecosystem:

· Custodians: Ensure the legal correspondence between on-chain tokens and real-world assets—one of the most critical roles.

· Compliance layer: KYC/AML, investor accreditation, geographic restrictions, cross-border compliance—all programmable.

· Issuance platforms: Enable anyone to tokenize assets legally and simply.

· Clearing and settlement infrastructure: Enable instant settlement, connecting on-chain and traditional banking systems.

· Oracles and data: Bring net asset value, interest rates, defaults, real estate prices, commodity prices on-chain—the foundation for token pricing.

· Legal and structuring services: SPVs, trusts, fund structures—without a legal underlying, a token is just a string of digits.

Emerging Markets Perspective: The Overlooked True Revolution

Rarely discussed in Western finance circles, but potentially the most important part: For billions in emerging markets, tokenization isn't "better finance"—it's the first financial system truly built for them.

Financial challenges in many emerging markets:

· High inflation, rapid local currency depreciation;

· Large unbanked or underbanked populations;

· Capital controls, preventing allocation to foreign currency and overseas assets;

· Cross-border remittance fees of 5%–10%, taking days;

· Extremely low local asset returns, failing to beat inflation.

Tokenization + stablecoins change all of this:

· Earn dollar yields without a U.S. bank account. Someone in Argentina can hold tokenized U.S. Treasuries, earning dollar yields via stablecoins. All that's needed is a wallet and internet—no accredited investor status, no wire transfers. In a country with 40% annual currency depreciation, this isn't an improvement; it's a lifeline.

· Stablecoins become savings tools. In high-inflation countries, USDC and USDT have become de facto savings vehicles for preserving value. Tokenized assets add yield on top of this.

· Ordinary people can invest in top global assets. People in Southeast Asia and Africa previously had almost no access to: U.S. Treasuries, investment-grade bonds, private credit, global real estate. Tokenization makes these assets fractional and 7×24 accessible.

· Instant, low-cost cross-border transfers. Remittances are vital for many economies, but traditional methods have high fees and slow processing. Stablecoins and tokenized assets complete transfers in minutes at minimal cost.

· Real-time payroll settlement. Wages can be paid on-chain in real-time; employees don't have to wait for payday and can withdraw anytime.

Globally, about 1.4 billion adults are unbanked, and billions more are underbanked. Tokenization + stablecoins offer the first path to truly large-scale financial inclusion that doesn't rely on traditional banks.

For these people, tokenization isn't just "making finance a bit better"—it's making finance accessible for the first time.

Complete Beneficiary Map

· Retail investors: Gain access and composability—low barrier, global, programmable capital.

· Issuers: Faster funding, lower costs, broader investor base, more flexible products.

· Institutions: Real-time settlement, risk reduction, lower operational costs, increased transparency.

· Regulators: On-chain traceability, embedded compliance—shifting from passive to real-time, precise oversight.

· Infrastructure providers: Become the underlying pipes of a trillion-dollar market, with massive long-term gains.

· Emerging markets: Truly achieve financial inclusion, solving structural issues like inflation, controls, and lack of services.

Essential Risk Disclaimer

Tokenization is not a panacea:

· It cannot fix bad assets

· It does not guarantee liquidity

· It does not make risks disappear

Tokenized bonds can still default; tokenized real estate can still drop in value. If the legal structure is weak, custody is unreliable, oracles are fraudulent, or the issuer doesn't manage the asset, the token is worthless.

All the benefits are real, supported by logic and reality, but they only materialize if the legal, custody, compliance, and operational aspects are all done correctly.

The token is just the final piece; everything underlying it is what truly matters.

Tokenization is not magic; it's infrastructure. And infrastructure only works if built correctly.

So, Who Benefits the Most?

Frankly: It depends on the timeframe.

· Short-term: Institutions and issuers win first

They save real money immediately on clearing, compliance, and operations—no need for retail investors or secondary markets, just better infrastructure.

· Medium-term: Infrastructure and technology providers win

By 2030, the market size could reach $11 trillion. Companies in custody, compliance, issuance, and clearing will become industry standards.

· Long-term: Retail investors and emerging market populations ultimately benefit the most

When infrastructure matures, compliance stabilizes, and secondary markets deepen, anyone globally can invest in any asset, 7×24, using their phone.

So, the answer to "who benefits the most" isn't a single group. Rather: Everyone benefits, just at different times, for different reasons, in different ways.

Domande pertinenti

QWho are the main beneficiaries of real-world asset tokenization according to the article?

AAlmost everyone benefits, but in different ways, at different times, and for different underlying reasons. The key beneficiaries include retail investors, issuers, institutions, infrastructure builders, and emerging markets.

QHow does tokenization specifically benefit retail investors?

ATokenization transforms retail investors from spectators into participants by lowering investment thresholds (e.g., $100 instead of $1 million), enabling 24/7 global access, providing composability (e.g., using tokens as collateral for loans), and allowing self-custody without intermediaries.

QWhat advantages do institutions gain from asset tokenization?

AInstitutions benefit from near-instant settlement (T+0), which reduces counterparty risk, frees up capital tied in清算 cycles, lowers operational costs, improves transparency, and enhances regulatory compliance.

QWhy is tokenization particularly transformative for emerging markets?

AFor emerging markets, tokenization provides the first accessible financial system by enabling dollar-denominated收益 (e.g., via tokenized U.S. treasuries), offering stablecoin savings tools, allowing global asset investment, facilitating low-cost cross-border transfers, and enabling real-time payroll结算—addressing issues like high inflation and limited banking access.

QWhat are the critical risks associated with tokenization mentioned in the article?

ATokenization cannot fix bad assets, guarantee liquidity, or eliminate risks. It relies on proper legal structures, reliable custody, accurate oracles, and competent asset management. Without these, tokenized assets may become worthless.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报39 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报39 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News57 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News57 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片