White House Warns It May Drop Crypto Bill Support After Coinbase Clash

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-17

Introduzione

Tensions escalated between the Trump Administration and Coinbase after the exchange withdrew support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Reports indicate the White House may also drop its support, feeling blindsided by Coinbase's move, which it viewed as a direct challenge. Officials are reportedly furious and may abandon the bill unless Coinbase returns to negotiations, particularly on stablecoin yield rules opposed by banking groups. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated the bill would worsen the current regulatory environment, banning tokenized equities, restricting DeFi, and increasing government access to private financial data. He also opposed shifting power from the CFTC to the SEC. Stablecoin yield provisions remain a major issue, with banks fearing deposit outflows due to competition. The standoff threatens the entire legislative effort, potentially delaying crypto market structure clarity. The crypto community is divided, with some praising Coinbase for defending innovation and others criticizing its unilateral approach. The conflict highlights stablecoin and DeFi regulations as key battlegrounds in the bill.

Tensions have escalated between the Trump Administration and the Coinbase exchange because the platform suddenly pulled its support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, and rumors have been spreading that the Trump White House is pulling the plug on the bill.

Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett said in a Sunday post on X that the White House is considering pulling its support for the Senate’s crypto market structure bill following Coinbase’s move. Terrett cited a source close to the administration who claimed officials felt blindsided by Coinbase’s decision and now view it as a direct challenge to the White House’s authority over the legislation.

“The White House is said to be furious with Coinbase’s unilateral action,” the source told Terrett, calling it a “rug pull” against the administration and the broader industry coalition pushing for regulation.

According to the report, officials may fully abandon the bill unless Coinbase returns to negotiations and accepts a compromise, especially on stablecoin yield rules that banking groups have aggressively supported. “This is President Trump’s bill at the end of the day, not Brian Armstrong’s,” the source added.

Coinbase pulls support, warns bill harms crypto

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated on Wednesday that his company, and Coinbase itself, were unable to support the draft of the Senate Banking Committee because it would actually lead to a worse situation than what they are dealing with now. “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” Armstrong said. This is their way of saying that it is better to stick with what they have.

Among the major points raised by Armstrong were the following: “The draft will effectively ban tokenized equities,” in addition to broad restrictions on decentralized finance and increased government access to financial information in a way that invades privacy. He also argued the proposal would weaken the Commodity Futures Trading Commission while giving the Securities and Exchange Commission more power, an outcome many crypto firms oppose due to the SEC’s enforcement-first posture in recent years.

Stablecoin yield provisions remain the biggest flashpoint. Armstrong said the draft risks “killing rewards” on stablecoins, echoing industry fears that lawmakers are shaping the bill to protect traditional banks from competition.

Banking trade groups have pushed hard for restrictions, arguing that stablecoin yields of around 4% to 5% could pull deposits out of savings accounts, especially from community banks. Barron’s cited concerns that stablecoin interest could trigger major deposit outflows and reduce bank lending capacity.

Political fallout threatens the entire market structure push

This standoff has introduced actual political risks for the bill. The crypto market structure outline would establish how the SEC and CFTC regulate digital assets, which is considered essential for institutional adoption. This withdrawal by Coinbase has introduced actual disruption, including the postponement of the timeline by the Senate Banking Committee.

Now, if the White House follows through and pulls support, lawmakers could struggle to build enough momentum to move the bill forward quickly, especially if industry unity fractures.

Crypto community splits on Coinbase’s strategy

Reaction across crypto has been mixed. Many users praised Coinbase for refusing to accept a bill they believe protects banks at the expense of innovation. Nic Carter, cofounder of Coin Metrics, criticized banking pressure in blunt terms, suggesting banks should stop trying to block competition.

However, others argued Coinbase overplayed its hand. Critics said Coinbase is only one exchange and should not act like it can veto industry-wide legislation, particularly when market structure clarity affects every sector of crypto.

At this point, the negotiations seem inconclusive. In either case, one thing has become clear: The war over stablecoin rates and DeFi limitations has become the “line in the sand” within the most significant crypto bill in Washington.

Highlighted Crypto News:

U.S. Government Retains Forfeited Bitcoin Under Strategic Reserve Policy

TagsCoinbasecrypto regulationDeFistablecoinsWhite House

Domande pertinenti

QWhy is the White House considering withdrawing support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act?

AThe White House is considering pulling its support because officials felt blindsided by Coinbase's sudden withdrawal of support and view it as a direct challenge to the administration's authority over the legislation.

QWhat were Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's main objections to the Senate's crypto market structure bill?

AArmstrong objected that the bill would effectively ban tokenized equities, impose broad restrictions on DeFi, increase government access to financial information in a privacy-invasive way, weaken the CFTC, and give more power to the SEC. He also opposed the stablecoin yield provisions that could 'kill rewards'.

QWhat is the primary concern of banking groups regarding stablecoin yields?

ABanking trade groups argue that stablecoin yields of 4% to 5% could pull deposits out of traditional savings accounts, particularly from community banks, potentially triggering major deposit outflows and reducing bank lending capacity.

QHow has the crypto community reacted to Coinbase's decision to withdraw support for the bill?

AReactions have been mixed. Some praised Coinbase for refusing a bill they believe protects banks at the expense of innovation, while others criticized the exchange for overplaying its hand and acting like it could veto industry-wide legislation.

QWhat potential consequence does the White House's potential withdrawal of support have for the crypto bill?

AIf the White House pulls its support, lawmakers could struggle to build enough momentum to move the bill forward quickly, especially if industry unity fractures, potentially delaying or jeopardizing the entire market structure legislation.

Letture associate

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit1 h fa

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit1 h fa

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbit1 h fa

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbit1 h fa

From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?

From the SpaceX IPO, which targets a $750 billion raise at a $1.77 trillion valuation, we can extrapolate capital flow trends relevant to crypto. The focus shifts from speculative narratives to foundational infrastructure and real-world asset (RWA) integration. Key crypto sectors poised to benefit include: 1. **AI Infrastructure**: The narrative is moving from consumer-facing AI applications to underlying, scarce resources like compute power and decentralized GPU networks (e.g., TAO, RENDER, AKT, IO). These protocols are positioning as the essential "picks and shovels" providers for the AI economy. 2. **Real-World Assets (RWA)**: Beyond tokenized treasury bonds, RWA's future lies in on-chain equity and pre-IPO assets like SpaceX. This could democratize access to high-growth assets and reshape global capital flows, benefiting infrastructure projects like ONDO, LINK, and Plume that facilitate issuance, data, and liquidity. 3. **Core Financial Infrastructure**: Stablecoins, payment networks, and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) are critical for settling the future on-chain economy. Their role expands from internal trading tools to foundational layers for global finance, AI systems, and real-world asset networks, leading to potential value reassessment. In summary, the next cycle may prioritize long-term infrastructure value—AI compute, asset tokenization networks, and settlement layers—over short-lived application hype, mirroring the broader market's shift towards funding the foundational systems of the future.

marsbit2 h fa

From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HOUSE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Housecoin (HOUSE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HousecoinHOUSE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Housecoin (HOUSE)Dopo aver acquistato Housecoin (HOUSE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Housecoin (HOUSE)Scambia facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

285 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.04.27Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare HOUSE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HOUSE HOUSE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片