White House pushes banks and crypto industry for a stablecoin yield deal by February

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-03

Introduzione

The White House is pushing the banking and crypto industries to reach a deal on stablecoin yields by the end of February to advance the crypto market structure bill. While Patrick Witt from the President’s Council of Advisors on Digital Assets expressed optimism about resolving the issue, progress has been complicated by Coinbase's withdrawal of support over the stablecoin yield ban. Banking representatives, including JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon, strongly oppose stablecoin yields, emphasizing the need for policies that protect the financial system. Crypto trade unions like the Blockchain Association viewed the White House meeting as a positive step, but Galaxy’s head of research doubted the banking sector's willingness to compromise. Polymarket’s odds of the bill passing this year slipped from 65% to 60% after the talks, though it remains unclear if a compromise will be reached by the deadline.

The White House has pressed the banking and crypto industries to reach a deal on stablecoin yields by the end of February to advance the crypto market structure bill.

Following the meeting brokered by the White House and industry representatives, Patrick Witt, the Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors on Digital Assets, appeared optimistic about the bill’s outcome.

He said,

“Over the course of the past few months, we have achieved breakthroughs on several seemingly intractable policy issues. I am confident we will be able to resolve this one (stablecoin yield), too.”

The bill’s momentum ground to a halt mid-last month after Coinbase pulled its support, citing a ban on stablecoin yield, which has become a key deal-breaker.

Interestingly, Coinbase’s stance was quite different from crypto VC a16z and Ripple, which are the other two key donors behind the industry’s largest super PAC, Fairshake.

In late January, the White House instructed Coinbase to return to the negotiating table. But it has not been smooth sailing.

According to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), top banking officials, including JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon, clashed with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong over the stablecoin rewards at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.

Banks aren’t backing down

Unsurprisingly, bankers have maintained their strong opposition to stablecoin yields, even after the recent White House talks.

In a statement, the American Bankers Association (ABA) called for a ‘thoughtful, effective policy’ around crypto, adding that,

“As we shared in the meeting, we must ensure that any legislation supports the local lending to families and small businesses that drives economic growth and protects the safety and soundness of our financial system.”

Reacting to the bankers’ statement, Galaxy’s head of research, Alex Thorn, doubted the sector’s willingness to compromise on the bill.

“It reads nice, but it doesn’t really sound like they are willing to compromise here.”

But Summer Mersinger, the CEO of the Blockchain Association, a body representing over 100 crypto firms, including Coinbase, hailed the White House meeting as a ‘step forward’ to advance the bill.

She noted,

“Today’s White House meeting was an important step forward in the effort to deliver bipartisan digital asset market structure legislation to the President’s desk.”

A similar optimistic tone was echoed by another crypto trade union, The Digital Chamber (TDC).

Chance of bill’s passage jumped to +60%

But despite the mixed sentiment from both sides, Polymarket’s odds of passing the bill this year slipped from 65% to 60% after the White House talks.

It’s worth noting that the chance of advancing the bill had increased from 50% to 65% in the past two days ahead of the meeting.

Even so, it remains unclear whether a compromise will be reached by the end of the month.


Final Thoughts

  • Crypto trade unions appeared ‘optimistic’ about the progress of the market structure bill following the White House meeting.
  • But Galaxy’s Thorn was concerned that a stablecoin yield compromise may remain elusive, preventing the bill from advancing.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the deadline set by the White House for the banking and crypto industries to reach a deal on stablecoin yields?

AThe end of February.

QWhy did the crypto market structure bill's momentum halt last month, and which company was responsible?

AThe bill's momentum halted after Coinbase pulled its support, citing a ban on stablecoin yield as a key deal-breaker.

QWhat was the reaction of the American Bankers Association (ABA) to the proposed stablecoin legislation?

AThe ABA called for a 'thoughtful, effective policy' and stated that any legislation must support local lending to families and small businesses and protect the safety of the financial system.

QAccording to the article, what happened to the Polymarket odds of the bill passing after the White House talks?

AThe odds slipped from 65% to 60%.

QWhich two organizations, besides Coinbase, are key donors behind the industry's largest super PAC, Fairshake?

ACrypto VC firm a16z and Ripple.

Letture associate

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbit3 min fa

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbit3 min fa

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit1 h fa

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit1 h fa

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbit1 h fa

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HOUSE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Housecoin (HOUSE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HousecoinHOUSE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Housecoin (HOUSE)Dopo aver acquistato Housecoin (HOUSE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Housecoin (HOUSE)Scambia facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

243 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.04.27Aggiornato il 2025.04.27

Come comprare HOUSE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HOUSE HOUSE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片