While CEXs Are Still Competing on Experience, Hyperliquid Is Already Trading Precious Metals and Forex

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

While centralized exchanges (CEXs) are still competing on user experience, Hyperliquid has expanded into trading precious metals and foreign exchange. The platform is shifting its narrative from being a user-friendly decentralized exchange (DEX) to becoming a crypto-native, on-chain Nasdaq through its HIP-3 protocol, offering synthetic assets like oil, forex, and metals. This move reflects a broader industry trend where on-chain liquidity is beginning to integrate with real-world assets, offering tighter spreads, faster execution, and 24/7 availability. Hyperliquid is also introducing new market rules such as full transparency, permissionless listings, and fee redistribution, using code-based trust to challenge the opaque advantages of CEXs and traditional finance.

Author: Haotian

While mainstream assets are collectively stagnant, $HYPE has managed to chart an independent strong bullish candle, which is indeed thought-provoking. Many are asking why the Perp DEX sector has been quiet lately, but the performance of @HyperliquidX actually provides the answer:

1) The narrative ceiling has changed. The old story of Perp DEXs approaching CEX-level experience is no longer compelling. It seems Hyperliquid is breaking away from the internal competition of being a "user-friendly DEX" and is breaking through to a full range of synthetic assets via the HIP-3 protocol.

It's shifting from the positioning of a DEX good enough to take down CEXs to a narrative of becoming the most crypto-native Nasdaq on-chain. Moving from pure crypto speculation to seamless trading of crude oil, forex, and precious metals—this directly elevates the vision;

2) The "backflow" of on-chain liquidity into real-world assets. Just look at how exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit are all building platforms and pushing the narrative of "asset tokenization"—it's clear that the growth ceiling for pure crypto assets has been reached.

Don't doubt it: when you find that the spread for trading silver on-chain is narrower than on CEXs, the response is faster than brokers, and it operates 24/7 without closing, it is no longer just a DEX but transforms into an all-weather global asset routing hub. This is an inevitable result of on-chain liquidity starting to backflow into the real world. Whoever hoists this banner first will be the winner;

3) A dimensional shift in rules. In the past, Perp DEXs were humbly imitating and trying to接近 CEX experience, but Hyperliquid has clearly elevated the game. The new rule logic is: absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing, fee rebate mechanisms, and other emerging market rules.

Ultimately, it uses code trust to dismantle the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi. Interestingly, decentralization isn’t even mentioned.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core narrative shift that Hyperliquid is undergoing according to the article?

AHyperliquid is shifting from being a 'user-friendly DEX' focused on competing with CEXs in crypto perpetual trading to becoming a 'Crypto Native Nasdaq on-chain' narrative, expanding into synthetic assets like crude oil, forex, and precious metals.

QHow does Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol contribute to its new direction?

AThe HIP-3 protocol enables Hyperliquid to offer a wide range of synthetic assets, allowing seamless trading of commodities like crude oil, forex, and precious metals, thus moving beyond pure crypto assets.

QWhat advantage does Hyperliquid have over traditional CEXs and TradFi in trading assets like silver?

AHyperliquid offers narrower spreads, faster response times, 24/7 non-stop trading, and greater transparency with on-chain trust, eliminating the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi.

QWhy are major exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit exploring 'asset tokenization' narratives?

AThey recognize the growth bottleneck of pure crypto assets and are seeking to leverage chain liquidity to tokenize real-world assets, following the trend of on-chain liquidity 'reverse irrigating' into实体 assets.

QWhat key rules does Hyperliquid use to differentiate itself from traditional CEXs?

AHyperliquid emphasizes on-chain absolute transparency, permissionless listing of new assets, fee rebate mechanisms, and using code-based trust to eliminate the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi, without explicitly focusing on decentralization.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit15 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit15 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit23 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit23 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News27 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News27 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit34 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit34 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit43 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit43 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片