Where Will DeFi Go Next?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-12

Introduzione

The DeFi sector has approached its previous all-time high in Total Value Locked (TVL), reaching $225 billion in late 2025, yet growth has stagnated with only a 10% increase over four years. This indicates that the current user base—largely crypto-native—may have reached saturation. The next phase of growth must come from attracting mainstream users. Stablecoins have seen significant expansion, with USDT and USDC surpassing $260 billion in combined market cap, exceeding the entire DeFi TVL. The rise of yield-bearing stablecoins and Real-World Assets (RWA), now over $20 billion, reflects strong demand for on-chain yield. However, these products remain largely confined to crypto-savvy users. Compared to the fintech sector, which manages over $2 trillion in customer assets, DeFi remains a niche. To break through, DeFi must prioritize simple, secure, and收益-focused products that appeal to ordinary users, rather than complex financial structures or speculative mechanisms. Embedded DeFi integrations within fintech apps could help bridge this gap, but consumer-facing protocols that simplify access to yield will be key to capturing the next wave of adoption.

Editor's Note: DeFi is once again approaching its historical high but has failed to break through significantly, revealing not a lack of products but a bottleneck in user growth. The expansion of stablecoins, yield-bearing stablecoins, and RWA indicates that the demand for moving funds on-chain and earning yields remains strong, yet it has not been truly brought to the mass market.

This article argues that the next step for DeFi lies not in more complex structures or speculative designs, but in simple, secure, yield-focused products, along with user-friendly access and distribution methods for ordinary users. Only when DeFi begins to target fintech users, rather than solely serving crypto-native audiences, can a new growth cycle truly begin.

Below is the original text:

Current Situation

In 2025, DeFi's total value locked (TVL) reached a new historical high, but it did not significantly exceed the peak of 2021. As the market gradually cools, a question worth revisiting is: where will the next wave of capital and users come from?

Driven by DeFi Summer, TVL climbed to $204 billion by the end of 2021. Subsequently, following the collapse of events like FTX and the market entering a bear phase, the capital scale declined steadily. Later, DeFi struggled to recover, reaching $225 billion in October 2025. However, a mere 10% growth over four years can hardly be considered explosive. The earliest participants in DeFi—primarily crypto-native users and traders—may have nearly reached the "ceiling."

The proximity of these two peaks is indeed cause for caution, but it does not yet constitute a "survival crisis." The current user base—though highly engaged and loyal—is not large enough to propel DeFi to the next level on its own.

To achieve a breakthrough, DeFi needs to reach a larger audience. The good news is that such an audience does exist—it is still on the sidelines, waiting to be properly "onboarded" with the right tools and products.

A Glimmer of Hope

Over the past year, the stablecoin market has been one of the biggest beneficiaries. The amount of USD on-chain has reached a historical high, more than ever before. USDT and USDC have continued to grow steadily, with their combined market capitalization exceeding $260 billion—meaning that the scale of stablecoins alone is already larger than the entire DeFi market.

Even without parabolic growth in DeFi, people continue to mint stablecoins, indicating that the demand for moving funds on-chain remains strong. At the same time, an increasing number of users are beginning to access the yields provided by DeFi, and the growth in this area points to where the next breakthrough may come from.

The rise of yield-bearing stablecoins and RWA (real-world assets) further confirms this trend. According to @stablewatchHQ data, the scale of yield-bearing stablecoins has exceeded $20 billion, with products like sUSDS and sUSDe gaining significant adoption over the past year or so. Parallel to yield-bearing stablecoins, RWA has also made progress on-chain: these products, backed by traditional assets such as treasury bonds, offer real yields and are growing rapidly.

The problem is that they currently primarily cater to crypto-native users and large on-chain holders. As long as this remains the case, their potential will be underestimated. If they can be productized and packaged in a way that is more accessible to everyday users, yield-bearing stablecoins and RWA present enormous opportunities in the mass market.

Retail Has Not Yet Arrived

To understand the scale of this opportunity, it is helpful to compare DeFi with fintech. Currently, the entire DeFi TVL is approximately $164 billion. In contrast, global mobile fintech apps manage over $2 trillion in customer assets; the top 100 neobanks alone have assets totaling $2.4 trillion. By comparison, DeFi is currently almost a negligible fraction.

The notion that "if you build it, they will come" can only drive limited growth. If DeFi wants to continue expanding, it must compete for the ordinary users that have made fintech so vast.

In 2025, the success of protocols like Aave, Ethena, and Pendle has demonstrated a strong demand for yield among market participants. They were the highlights of the year, attracting significant capital and attention. If such products can be delivered to the masses in a clear, understandable, and low-barrier manner, the potential encompasses (literally) trillions of dollars in capital and tens of millions of potential users.

The Path Forward

The real test for DeFi in the coming year is whether it can make yield opportunities easily and safely accessible to ordinary people. Growth will not come from more complex financial structures, the 100th liquidity mining pool, the 100th perpetual futures DEX, or the millionth airdrop. Growth will come from simple, reliable products—built on decentralized protocols—that solve real problems for ordinary people. And yield should be center stage (ahem, Aave App, ahem).

Today, hundreds of millions of people use banking and fintech apps daily, already accustomed to managing their funds on their phones. If DeFi can capture even a small share of this, it will be enough to trigger a new wave of growth, and it will not once again stall at the $200 billion TVL level.

Embedded DeFi will play a crucial role in this—fintech companies and neobanks integrating on-chain yield capabilities directly into their products. But teams should not stop there. The protocols that are truly consumer-facing and at the forefront will capture the greatest upside; those that continue to optimize only for crypto-native users will ultimately be competing for a pie that may no longer be expanding.

DeFi will win.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason DeFi has not experienced explosive growth despite reaching a new TVL high in 2025?

AThe main reason is that DeFi has primarily served crypto-native users and traders, who are nearing their 'ceiling,' and has failed to attract a broader audience of ordinary users.

QWhat evidence suggests that there is still strong demand for moving funds on-chain?

AThe stablecoin market has reached a new all-time high, with USDT and USDC combined市值 exceeding $260 billion, which is larger than the entire DeFi market.

QWhat types of products have shown significant growth and adoption in the past year, indicating potential for broader appeal?

AYield-bearing stablecoins (like sUSDS and sUSDe) and Real World Assets (RWA) have seen substantial growth, offering real yields and attracting significant adoption.

QHow does the size of DeFi's TVL compare to the assets managed by fintech applications and neobanks?

ADeFi's TVL is about $164 billion, while global mobile fintech apps manage over $2 trillion in customer assets, and the top 100 neobanks alone hold $2.4 trillion in assets, making DeFi a negligible fraction in comparison.

QWhat is the key challenge for DeFi to achieve its next growth cycle and attract mainstream users?

AThe key challenge is to create simple, secure, and收益-focused products that are easy for ordinary users to understand and use, rather than developing complex financial structures or relying solely on crypto-native optimizations.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit30 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit30 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit49 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit49 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit58 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit58 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片