When Crypto Is No Longer Fun, When Multicoin Capital Loses Its Soul

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-05

Introduzione

Kyle Samani, co-founder and managing partner of Multicoin Capital, has announced his departure from the firm’s daily operations and investment decisions, shifting his focus to other technology sectors such as AI and life sciences. Samani, widely regarded as one of crypto’s most influential and contrarian investors, played a key role in the firm’s early bet on Solana, which yielded massive returns. In a since-deleted social media post, Samani expressed that crypto is “not as fun as it used to be,” and no longer believes in the broader Web3 vision. He now sees blockchain primarily as a financial ledger with limited applications beyond finance, though he remains optimistic about privacy and DePIN sectors. Multicoin Capital’s investment activity has slowed significantly since late 2024, with only 10 deals since October 2024, far fewer than other top VCs. The firm’s major investments, such as Wormhole and Pyth Network, have also underperformed. Samani’s exit reflects a broader trend of key figures leaving crypto during a prolonged market downturn, citing disillusionment with the industry’s direction, unsustainable models, and weakened narratives. Despite this, firms like a16z and Pantera Capital remain active, suggesting the industry’s reassessment hasn’t yet turned into a full-scale exodus.

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher

Today, Kyle Samani, co-founder and managing partner of Multicoin Capital, announced on his social media account that he will step down from the daily management and investment decisions of Multicoin Capital and will explore opportunities in other technology fields outside the crypto industry in the future. Multicoin subsequently stated that the fund will continue to operate normally, and existing investments and team structure will not be affected.

The "Best Crypto Investor" Chooses to Fade Away

This is undoubtedly big news in the crypto VC circle. For a long time, Kyle Samani frequently wrote long articles, participated in industry debates, maintained a clear stance on investment strategies, and, thanks to his early investment in Solana which brought hundreds of times returns, he was not only the soul of Multicoin Capital but also one of the most influential investors in the crypto industry with significant say.

Previously, Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner of Dragonfly, wrote an article about the three crypto investors he most admired, with Dan Robinson, Chris Dixon, and Kyle Samani ranking third, second, and first respectively.

"Kyle is one of the few truly contrarian investors in the cryptocurrency space. I disagree with almost all of his views. But his initial investments, and his firm belief in holding Solana through the trough after the FTX collapse, make him undoubtedly one of the greatest venture capitalists in cryptocurrency history," wrote Haseeb Qureshi.

And it is such a "historical best" who chose to resign at one of the bleakest moments in the crypto industry, which inevitably makes one ponder the underlying meaning: even the top VC investors can no longer persist? After all, a few years ago, even when the price of SOL fell below $10 due to the FTX incident, he still stuck to his investment views and eventually proved himself with a more than 25-fold increase.

And shortly after the news was announced, a tweet posted and quickly deleted by Kyle Samani on his X account earlier today was also dug up.

According to information, Kyle Samani, in response to a吐槽 (complaint) post by X user Taran (@Taran_ss), said: "Crypto just isn't as fun as many people (including myself) once thought. I used to believe in the Web3 vision, believed in dApps. Now I don't. Blockchains are essentially asset ledgers. They will reshape finance, but that's about it, not much more. DePIN is another area worth noting. Crypto will continue to get better, but all the really interesting questions have been answered, except for on-chain privacy/confidentiality. (I still firmly believe Zama will win this track.)"

In this reply, Kyle Samani clearly believes that crypto is no longer fun and no longer believes in the Web3 vision. Apart from reshaping finance, blockchain is unlikely to play a greater role in other areas. Privacy and DePIN are the only areas he still recognizes.

Multicoin Capital's letter to LPs further verified the matter of "Kyle losing interest in crypto." stating that "Kyle's interests have expanded from cryptocurrency to other technology fields such as artificial intelligence, life sciences, and robotics. He has decided to devote time to exploring these emerging technologies."

Data also reflects that Multicoin Capital's attitude and strategy are undergoing significant changes. According to RootData, since the second half of 2025, Multicoin Capital has only participated in 4 investment rounds, and only 10 since October 2024. This not only represents a significant slowdown in investment frequency compared to before but also lags明显 behind the investment frequency of other well-known VCs during the same period, ranking outside the top 50.

Multicoin Capital Investment Round History Source: RootData

These changes are partly due to the bleak market and performance. Among the projects Multicoin Capital heavily invested in in recent years, Wormhole, invested at a valuation of $2.5 billion (the total amount raised in this round was $225 million, second only to investment rounds in Forward Industries, FTX, and Solana), now has a token FDV of only $220 million. Pyth Network token FDV is only $480 million, and Solana's market value has fallen below $100 again.

At this point, the reason for Kyle Samani's departure is very clear: he believes the development direction of crypto has deviated from his expectations, even his values. The shattering of his ideals forced him to leave this place of disappointment and try to regain his passion in fields like AI and life sciences.

Next, Multicoin Capital will also have to face the situation after "losing its soul." Kyle Samani's exit will undoubtedly raise questions about its future direction and leadership: with the sharp slowdown in investment and organizational adjustments, will Multicoin Capital still be one of the industry's top research-oriented, conviction-driven VCs?

The Trough of Idealism

In fact, before Kyle Samani, many crypto investors and entrepreneurs have expressed similar views, resigning and choosing to temporarily leave the crypto industry. Just in January, a16z Crypto general partner Arianna Simpson announced her departure and plans to establish a new fund investing in various industries, not limited to crypto.

A more famous case is Ken Chan, former co-founder and CTO of Aevo. In an article published in November '25, he bluntly stated that he had wasted 8 years of his life on cryptocurrency and described the crypto industry as "the world's largest, most engaged super casino."

"Spending eight years in the cryptocurrency space completely destroyed my ability to discern sustainable business models. In crypto, you don't need a successful business or product to make money. The cryptocurrency industry is filled with tokens with extremely high market capitalizations but almost no users," Ken Chan believed. "This industry mentality is extremely harmful, and I believe it will lead to a long-term collapse of social mobility for the younger generation."

A series of接连出现的 cases are outlining a clearer trend: against the backdrop of a持续偏紧 macro environment, as the wealth effect of the crypto market明显减弱, the large-scale落地 of typical products is长期受阻, and the core narratives that once supported the industry's expansion are逐一证伪, the crypto industry is阶段性地 losing some of its earliest entrants and most idealistic builders and investors.

This loss does not mean a fundamental denial of crypto technology, but reflects that the patience driven by idealism is being tested by a continuously lengthening realization cycle. Before the return structure, industry order, and long-term expectations are重新建立, some core participants choose to exit阶段性地.

In past cycles, many VC investors have emphasized that high-return investments often occur when the market is "unloved," and bear markets are the best time to capture investment alpha. But now, even the "historical best investor" is choosing to turn and leave at this moment, which itself sends a signal worthy of serious consideration by the industry: the problem may no longer be just a cyclical market pullback, but the阶段性瓶颈 in the crypto industry's innovation capability, value orientation, and narrative vision is perhaps undergoing unprecedented scrutiny and re-evaluation.

Fortunately, more first-tier VCs like Coinbase Ventures, a16z, YZi Labs, and Pantera Capital remain active, with over 30 investments each in the past year. For the crypto industry in an adjustment period, the support from these VCs may not bring immediate prosperity, but it at least means that this round of re-evaluation has not yet turned into a complete exit.

Domande pertinenti

QWhy did Kyle Samani decide to step back from Multicoin Capital and the crypto industry?

AKyle Samani decided to step back because he no longer finds crypto interesting and has lost faith in the Web3 vision. He believes blockchain is primarily an asset ledger that will reshape finance but has limited applications beyond that, prompting him to explore other tech fields like AI and life sciences.

QWhat was Kyle Samani's reputation in the crypto investment community before his departure?

AKyle Samani was regarded as one of the most influential and top crypto investors, often described as a true contrarian. He was notably praised for his early investment in Solana and his steadfast belief in it during the FTX collapse, earning him recognition as one of the greatest venture capitalists in crypto history by figures like Haseeb Qureshi.

QHow has Multicoin Capital's investment activity changed recently according to the article?

AMulticoin Capital's investment activity has significantly slowed, with only 4 investment rounds since the second half of 2025 and 10 since October 2024. This pace is much slower than before and lags behind other prominent VCs, ranking outside the top 50 in investment frequency.

QWhat broader trend does Kyle Samani's exit reflect in the crypto industry?

AKyle Samani's exit reflects a broader trend of idealistic builders and investors leaving crypto due to diminished wealth effects, stalled product scalability, and disproven core narratives. It indicates a phase where patience is wearing thin, and some key participants are reassessing the industry's innovation capabilities and long-term vision.

QWhich areas does Kyle Samani still see potential in within the crypto space?

AKyle Samani still sees potential in on-chain privacy/confidentiality, specifically mentioning his belief in Zama winning that sector, and he acknowledges DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) as another notable area with promise.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit12 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit12 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit31 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit31 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit40 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit40 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片