What should you expect from Bitcoin after FOMC meet?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-10

Introduzione

The U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to implement a 25 bps rate cut, with markets anticipating a limited economic boost. However, historical data shows Bitcoin has previously declined after such announcements—8% and 12% drops followed the September and October cuts. Analysts suggest the market may have already priced in the rate cut, explaining Bitcoin’s recent rally to $94k, which still faces resistance. While short-term bullish signals exist, the broader trend remains cautious. A bearish scenario appears more likely, with potential dips to $90.6k or lower. Traders are advised to remain neutral or bearish until Bitcoin convincingly breaks the $96k resistance level.

The U.S. Federal Reserve’s final meeting of the year began on the 9th of December. The CME Group’s Fed Watch tool showed that traders and investors expect a 25 bps rate cut, while assigning only a small probability to a 50 bps cut.

Anticipated rate cuts are expected to boost the economy by lowering borrowing costs. The Fed has maintained this stance in recent months, having already announced cuts in September and October.

In a post on X, Futures trader Ardi pointed out that a rate cut might not be immediately bullish for Bitcoin [BTC]. The 25 bps rate cuts in September and October were followed by a Bitcoin price drop of 8% and 12%, respectively.

Has the FOMC announcement been priced in?

There was a pattern to the move, the analyst explained. Before the actual announcement of the easing rates, the market tends to front-run the expectation.

The actual rally would already have finished by the time of the upcoming FOMC announcement.

This helped explain the rally on Tuesday that saw Bitcoin gain 5.7% in 12 hours to reach $94k. However, as the 4-hour chart shows, the rally moved up but not beyond the supply zone (red box) in place since mid-November.

The OBV has been slowly trending higher in December. It is unclear if this buying pressure is enough to propel prices higher.

The structure was also bullish on the H4 chart, with a bullish structure break (orange) seen on Tuesday. If the buyers can keep up the pressure, it is possible to breach the $94k resistance.

As the previous post-FOMC BTC dips show, this break might need more time.

On the 1-hour chart, the bullish pressure remained intact at press time. The imbalance (white box) on this timeframe extended down to $90.6k.

Explaining the bullish Bitcoin scenario

As things stand, the bullish reaction seems delayed. It could be because the market is waiting for macroeconomic news. In this case, a move beyond $96k and a retest of the $94k-$95k area as support would offer a buying opportunity.

Bitcoin traders, stay neutral or lean bearish

The bearish scenario was the more likely outcome. The lack of a strong reaction from the retest of the H1 imbalance around $92.5k suggested that a short-term dip to $90.6k, the low of the gap, is incoming.

Traders should be wary of a move below $90.6k and $89.9k as the first clues of a deeper retracement.

The price dip could go as deep as $88k, or even $84k, before recovery begins. Traders should be prepared for either scenario, but need not rush to open positions right away.


Final Thoughts

  • The previous rate cut announcements were not followed by strong, sustained Bitcoin price rallies, given the longer-term downtrend in place.
  • Therefore, traders can remain bearishly biased now until the $96k resistance level is breached.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Letture associate

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

Alliance DAO founder qw (@QwQiao) sparked intense debate in the crypto community by claiming that Layer 1 blockchains have "limited moats," rating them only 3/10 in terms of sustainable competitive advantage. This triggered strong reactions from key industry figures. Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb strongly disagreed, arguing that Ethereum’s decade-long dominance despite well-funded challengers proves its strong moat. Others, like Multicoin’s Kyle Samani and researchers from Ethereum and Circle, questioned whether liquidity alone constitutes a real moat, with some calling it fleeting and unreliable. In response, qw elaborated on his moat rating framework, giving traditional giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Visa perfect scores (10/10) based on revenue models and infrastructure, while rating top crypto projects around 5/10. He notably rated Bitcoin at 9/10, citing its unique founding story and Lindy effect, but deducted a point due to uncertainties around security and quantum threats. The debate expanded into what truly constitutes a moat in crypto. Critics argued qw’s framework overemphasizes current revenue and undervalues network effects, trust, and technological ethos. Defenders of blockchain moats pointed to elements like developer ecosystems, brand strength, switching costs, and application diversity as core defensive attributes. The article concludes that the crypto industry is still young and small compared to traditional finance and tech giants. Rather than fixating on abstract moat concepts, the priority should be solving real user needs at scale, driving adoption, and expanding overall market reach.

marsbit1 h fa

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片