What should you expect from 10 February’s White House stablecoin meeting?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

White House officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto executives are meeting on 10 February to address the deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with interest-paying stablecoins being the most contentious issue. Crypto firms argue that offering yield supports innovation and user benefits, citing companies like Coinbase which earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025. Traditional banks, however, warn of a potential $6.6 trillion outflow from deposits. Another key point is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which neither side finds satisfactory. Past policy delays and meeting cancellations have triggered sharp market declines, while agreements like the GENIUS Act spurred rallies. Currently, market sentiment is nervous, with total crypto valuation dropping 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a day, and major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH facing downward pressure. Analysts see this as reducing risk rather than a full market crash. Ultimately, the conflict reflects a broader struggle over the future financial system, with markets reacting strongly to regulatory uncertainty.

Inside the White House, a high-pressure struggle is reaching a turning point as government officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto founders meet on 10 February to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act.

At the center of the conflict is the issue of interest-paying stablecoins, which has become the most divisive topic in the debate.

Crypto companies argue that offering yield is a natural step towards building a modern and efficient financial system that benefits everyday users and supports innovation. For instance, companies like Coinbase, which have earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025 alone, see yield as critical to their business.

Traditional banks, however, see this as a serious threat and warn that $6.6 trillion from deposits could be drained from savings accounts.

Various other points of concern

Another major issue is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services under strict conditions.

Crypto companies say the access is too limited to support real growth and stability. Banks, meanwhile, warn that even restricted access could open the door too quickly.

As a result, the proposal fails to satisfy either side, making compromise difficult.

Past meetings and their impact on the crypto market

History shows that policy delays have often triggered sharp market reactions. Last week itself, after the 02 February meeting, the total crypto market’s value dropped from $2.64 trillion to $2.54 trillion in a very short time.

Another major shock followed on 15 January when the Senate Banking Committee suddenly canceled its vote on the CLARITY Act.

Needless to say, the market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes and wiping out billions of dollars in value.

On the other hand, when lawmakers reach an agreement, the market also recovers quickly. A strong example is the GENIUS Act, signed on 18 July 2025. It sparked a bullish rally and pushed many altcoins up by nearly 12% in just one week.

Is the market on edge right now?

At present, the market is once again waiting to see what happens next. Even before the meeting concludes, stress is already visible across the crypto market.

The sentiment was well reflected by an X user who said,

Fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest have weakened investor confidence too. As a result, the total crypto market value fell to $2.36 trillion in a single day – A decline of 1.65%.

Bitcoin [BTC] has also struggled on the charts, trading near $69,132 at press time. Ethereum [ETH] seems to be following the same trend too, dropping to around $2,040 on the back of high traders’ anxiety.

And yet, despite the recent bouts of depreciation, analysts are not calling this a major crash. Instead, they see investors actively reducing risk and shifting into a more defensive position


Final Thoughts

  • The fight over stablecoin yield is really a fight over who gets to shape the next financial system.
  • Markets are reacting not to decisions, but to uncertainty caused by repeated delays and unfinished negotiations.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main topic of the White House meeting on February 10th?

AThe main topic is to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with a central focus on the issue of interest-paying stablecoins.

QWhy do traditional banks view interest-paying stablecoins as a threat?

ATraditional banks warn that interest-paying stablecoins could drain $6.6 trillion from savings accounts, posing a serious threat to their deposit base.

QWhat was the market reaction to the Senate Banking Committee canceling its vote on the CLARITY Act on January 15th?

AThe market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes, wiping out billions of dollars in value.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account system?

AIt is a proposed system that would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services, but under strict conditions that both crypto companies and traditional banks find unsatisfactory.

QHow did the market perform in the lead-up to the February 10th meeting?

AThe market was under stress, with the total crypto market value falling 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a single day due to weakened investor confidence and fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest.

Letture associate

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手5 min fa

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手5 min fa

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit13 min fa

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit13 min fa

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 h fa

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HOUSE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Housecoin (HOUSE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HousecoinHOUSE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Housecoin (HOUSE)Dopo aver acquistato Housecoin (HOUSE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Housecoin (HOUSE)Scambia facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

261 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.04.27Aggiornato il 2025.04.27

Come comprare HOUSE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HOUSE HOUSE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片