Visa Deepens Crypto Push With New Stablecoin Advisory Unit

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-17

Introduzione

Visa has launched a new stablecoin advisory service through its Visa Consulting & Analytics division to help banks, fintechs, and merchants integrate stablecoins into payments, treasury operations, and other business processes. The service includes market research, strategy development, technical support, and training via Visa University. Early clients include US financial institutions like Navy Federal Credit Union and Pathward. Visa reports an annualized stablecoin settlement volume of $3.5 billion and supports over 130 stablecoin-linked card programs globally. The move comes as the stablecoin market exceeds $250 billion, reflecting growing institutional and retail adoption.

According to reports, Visa has created a new stablecoin advisory service through its Visa Consulting & Analytics (VCA) division.

The initiative is designed to help banks, fintechs, merchants, and other large companies explore how stablecoins can be used for payments, treasury operations, and other business processes.

The program combines market research, technology integration support, and training to give clients practical guidance as they test and adopt stablecoin solutions.

Visa Expands Advisory Services

Sources indicate the advisory practice will provide market-fit assessments, strategy development, go-to-market planning, and technical enablement.

Visa has even launched a specialized stablecoin course via Visa University to train clients on the fundamentals and practical application of these digital assets.

The service aims to help organizations move from pilot programs to fully operational stablecoin systems while maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.

Early Clients And Market Context

Based on reports, several US financial institutions are among the first clients, including Navy Federal Credit Union, VyStar Credit Union, and Pathward.

The digital payments technology company has reported that its stablecoin settlement volume has reached an annualized run rate of roughly $3.5 billion as of late November 2025. The company supports over 130 stablecoin-linked card programs across more than 40 countries.

The overall stablecoin market has surpassed $250 billion in total value, highlighting strong interest from both retail and institutional participants.

Partnerships And Pilot Programs

Reports show Visa has been piloting stablecoin settlements for several years, including early work with USDC in 2023. Partnerships with firms like Aquanow have expanded settlement capabilities in regions such as Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

Visa also experimented with initiatives allowing businesses to make cross-border payments using stablecoins for pre-funding, in an effort to lower transaction costs and manage liquidity.

Total crypto market cap at $2.94 trillion on the daily chart: TradingView

The Importance And Rise Of Stablecoins

According to analysts quoted in news reports, the use of stablecoins by banks and fintechs for various purposes such as cross-border payments and business-to-business payments is being explored.

The advisory service offered by Visa assists the traditional firm in understanding the options available to them while implementing controls and incorporating new technology into existing payment systems. Such overall expertise in technology and regulations puts the company on their advisory panel to pilot their stablecoin offering.

Featured image from Wikimedia, chart from TradingView

Letture associate

Bitcoin perpetual open interest rises as traders bet on year-end rally

Bitcoin perpetual open interest has risen from 304,000 to 310,000 BTC as its price briefly reached $90,000, signaling increased trader anticipation of a year-end rally. The funding rate also climbed from 0.04% to 0.09%, indicating growing bullish sentiment and leveraged long positioning. However, high funding rates may also suggest market overheating and potential correction risks. Bitcoin retreated to $88,200 after failing to hold above $90,000. A major year-end options expiry event on Dec. 26, with over $23 billion in contracts, could amplify volatility. Calls are concentrated at $100,000 and $120,000 strikes, while puts cluster around $85,000, with a put/call ratio of 0.37 reflecting dominant bullish bets. The max pain price is $96,000, suggesting many optimistic calls may expire worthless if prices don't rise.

cointelegraph3 min fa

Bitcoin perpetual open interest rises as traders bet on year-end rally

cointelegraph3 min fa

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and U.S. Stocks?

In 2025, Bitcoin underperformed compared to gold and U.S. equities, particularly AI-driven tech stocks like NVIDIA, due to several fundamental factors. First, the rise of generative AI created a more efficient energy-to-value conversion, diverting capital and electricity from Bitcoin mining to high-margin AI data centers. This shift prioritized productivity gains over digital scarcity. Second, gold’s atomic-level physical certainty made it a superior hedge against geopolitical instability and systemic risks, whereas Bitcoin remains reliant on digital infrastructure and liquidity channels. Third, Bitcoin ETFs institutionalized the asset, reducing its volatility and aligning it more with traditional risk models, dampening its speculative appeal amid prolonged high-interest rates. Finally, the opportunity cost of holding non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin increased as investors chased exponential growth in AI. Bitcoin’s current phase represents a recalibration within a complex system—yielding temporarily to AI-driven productivity and defensive asset demand—rather than a long-term failure. It remains a potential long-term store of value awaiting future liquidity cycles.

比推6 min fa

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and U.S. Stocks?

比推6 min fa

The AI Era: When the 'Human-Dog Gap' Shrinks to the 'Human-Human Gap'

In the AI era, the gap between humans is narrowing from what was once likened to the difference between "humans and dogs" to a more comparable "human-to-human" difference. The author uses a hypothetical scoring system: a child scores 10 points, a PhD 60, a professor 75, and Einstein 100. With AI estimated at 40 points in cognitive value (effectively 80 when considering its generalist nature), a child with AI reaches 90 points, while Einstein with AI reaches 180—reducing their relative gap from 10x to 2x. Some argue that AI proficiency varies—novices may only leverage 20% of AI’s potential, while experts extract 100%, widening absolute gaps (e.g., child+AI novice=30 vs. Einstein+AI expert=200). However, the author contends this is temporary. As AI evolves, it will become smarter and easier to use, reducing the skill threshold. Future AI might score 240+ points, with humans consistently utilizing 80-120% of its potential. Eventually, a child with advanced AI could reach 1010 points, and Einstein 1100—a negligible 1.1x difference. The core idea: while current AI proficiency disparities may temporarily widen gaps, AI’s inevitable progress in intelligence and usability will democratize access, diminish human cognitive inequalities, and make individual expertise less impactful—like everyone having access to the same powerful tool.

marsbit8 min fa

The AI Era: When the 'Human-Dog Gap' Shrinks to the 'Human-Human Gap'

marsbit8 min fa

Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, but Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced the integration of a blockchain-based shared ledger into its infrastructure, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer-2 network Linea, to enable secure, real-time, and interoperable digital finance. This move, supported by major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank, aims to bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets using zk-EVM technology for faster, cheaper, and more transparent settlements. While Ripple pioneered blockchain-based cross-border payments with XRP Ledger and achieved significant legal and operational milestones—including court victories against the SEC and expansion into 40+ markets—its reach remains limited compared to Swift’s global network of over 11,000 institutions. Ripple’s model relies heavily on XRP as a bridge currency, whereas Swift’s asset-agnostic approach supports multiple currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs, reducing dependency on any single asset. Swift’s adoption of blockchain signals a major shift in global finance, potentially freeing trillions in trapped capital and enabling 24/7 real-time settlement. This transition from legacy systems to mathematically verified transactions represents a convergence of TradFi and DeFi, positioning Swift to dominate the next era of value transfer.

marsbit13 min fa

Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, but Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

marsbit13 min fa

Publicly Pumping Ethereum, Internally Bearish in Reports: Is Tom Lee's Team Still Trustworthy?

Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat and a prominent public Ethereum bull, faces credibility questions after an internal Fundstrat report presented a bearish short-term outlook, contrasting his highly optimistic public statements. Publicly, Lee repeatedly called Ethereum to reach $12,000-$15,000 by end-2025 and declared it "severely undervalued" at $3,000. He has been a vocal "perma-bull" in media appearances. However, Fundstrat's internal 2026 Crypto Outlook report, led by Digital Asset Strategist Sean Farrell, advised paying subscribers to expect a significant market correction in early 2026. Its base case predicted ETH could fall to $1,800-$2,000 and BTC to $60,000-$65,000, citing macroeconomic risks like a potential U.S. government shutdown and Federal Reserve leadership change. The report recommended clients increase cash/stablecoin holdings and wait for better entry points, while maintaining a long-term bullish year-end 2026 target of $4,500 for ETH. Fundstrat responded that the discrepancy stems from different analysts serving different client types: Lee's long-term, structural views are for traditional investors with low (1%-5%) crypto allocations, while Farrell's tactical, short-term risk management is for crypto-heavy portfolios. Critics argue this distinction was never clearly disclosed in Lee's public media appearances, which serve as marketing for Fundstrat's subscription service. Further complicating matters, Lee is also Chairman of BitMine, a company adopting an Ethereum treasury strategy, raising potential conflict of interest concerns about his public endorsements. The incident highlights the blurred lines between personal commentary, institutional research, and marketing in the crypto research space.

marsbit32 min fa

Publicly Pumping Ethereum, Internally Bearish in Reports: Is Tom Lee's Team Still Trustworthy?

marsbit32 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di PUSH PUSH sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片