Vanguard, BlackRock lead the ETF wave as market remains in ‘extreme fear’

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-26

The crypto market is sending mixed signals right now. On the price charts, things look better. At press time, the total market value had risen by 3.36% and was back to around $2.26 trillion. However, among investors, confidence is still very low.

Despite the prices going up, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index is still stuck in “Extreme Fear.” This shows that many people are still worried after the recent ups and downs. Instead of feeling excited, they are afraid the recovery won’t last.

And yet, according to LunarCrush, financial firms have dominated social media conversations over the past 24 hours.

This surge in attention around major financial firms can be closely tied to the growing influence of ETFs in both traditional markets and crypto.

Vanguard and BlackRock steal the spotlight

At the top of the list was Vanguard with 11.73k mentions. Social media chatter around Vanguard spiked by 146%, pushing daily mentions to an all-time high of 13.4k.

The post noted,

“Engagements are up 481% from the daily average.”

This was mainly because of massive inflows into its S&P 500 ETF, VOO. With over $30 billion added this year alone, Vanguard has become a key entry point for investors seeking stability.

Close behind was BlackRock with 9.27k mentions, whose Bitcoin [BTC] ETF has become the main gateway for institutional money into crypto.

Additionally, other sentiments around BlackRock are also adding to the hype.

“BLK is the firm people either trust with their retirement or point to when explaining why corporations behave badly. Both crowds were loud today.”

JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs trail behind

JPMorgan Chase has also gained attention with 8.2k mentions, as investors look for stability beyond crypto ETFs. Over 282+ spikes suggest fresh news, likely comments from CEO Jamie Dimon or new macro positioning, sparking renewed attention.

On the contrary, Goldman Sachs saw a noticeable drop in mentions, making it the only top-five firm losing social traction. This usually happens when market sentiment turns cautious.

Meanwhile, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) stood out as the only venture capital firm among trillion-dollar institutions. Its steady discussion was likely tied to its AI and crypto investments, along with visibility from co-founder Marc Andreessen.

Other major firms like Apollo Global Management, Fidelity Investments, Galaxy Digital, Blackstone, Temasek Holdings, KKR, Pantera Capital, and Bridgewater Associates were also part of the broader conversation.

Notably, Jane Street and Third Point saw unusually large spikes in attention, likely driven by specific trading or regulatory developments. Finally, Pantera’s rise reflected sustained momentum in crypto-focused discussions.

Social sentiment may be driving investor sentiment

The aforementioned data should be read within context though. Just recently, Google Trends revealed that global searches for “crypto” were at their lowest level in over a year. In August 2025, interest was at its peak. However, at press time, it had dropped to just 25.

That’s not all either as the “Bitcoin going to zero” phrase reached its highest level ever in February too.

Simply put, while most people are rushing for the exits, the world’s biggest money managers are quietly settling in and preparing for the next phase.


Final Summary

  • “Extreme Fear” reflects emotional exhaustion among retail investors, not necessarily market collapse.
  • Social media data suggested that attention may be shifting away from tokens and towards the institutions controlling access.

Letture associate

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 h fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 h fa

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1 h fa

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片