VanEck Debuts First U.S.-Based Avalanche ETF as AVAX Stays Under Pressure

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-27

Introduzione

VanEck launched the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF (VAVX) on January 26, offering direct exposure to AVAX and staking rewards. Despite this, AVAX remained under pressure, trading below $12 with a weekly decline of nearly 7%. The fund will waive fees for the first $500 million in assets until February 28, 2026, and can stake up to 70% of its holdings, potentially reducing market supply. Currently priced at $11.77, AVAX shows weak momentum with a declining trading volume. Key support lies at $11, while a break above $13 could lead to a move toward $14–$15.

Asset Manager VanEck launched the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF on January 26, and the product began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker VAVX, offering direct exposure to AVAX along with staking rewards. Despite this, AVAX continued under pressure, trading below $12 and experiencing a weekly fall of almost 7%.

During the period of VanEck Avalanche ETF from January 26, 2026, to February 28, 2026, VanEck will waive the entire Fee for the first $500 million of the assets. If the Trust’s assets exceed $500 million before February 28, 2026, the Fee charged on assets over $500 million will be 0.20%, as per the document.

In addition, the fund can stake up to 70% of its AVAX holdings, which could lock a meaningful portion of supply and reduce tokens available on the open market if demand holds up.

AVAX Price Analysis

With that, AVAX price is currently trading at $11.77, with 1.11% up today. Despite the modest daily bounce, the 24-hour trading volume is declining more than 20%, as it is down nearly 8% over the past month, as of writing.

Then, the open interest climbed 10.43% to $492 million, which indicates that traders are opening new positions despite slowing trading volume, as per Coinglass data. Which is a phase that could lead to a sharper price move once AVAX breaks out of its current range.

AVAX is trading around the $11.50-$12.00 support zone, and the overall trend is staying bearish as prices continue to create lower highs and lower lows.

Further indicators, RSI (Relative Strength Index), which is sitting at 39, a neutral zone, indicate a weak momentum. Meanwhile, MACD (Moving Average Convergence and Divergence) is showing strong selling pressure, as confirmed by the MACD line being below the signal line.

The price has immediate support at $11, with a further pullback potentially exposing the $10; while on the upside, a clear push above $13.00 might allow the price to stretch beyond the $14.00-$15.00 range.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

‌US Wall Street Indexes Close Higher as Crypto Market Maintains its Trade Price

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name and ticker symbol of the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF launched by VanEck?

AThe ETF is called the VanEck Avalanche ETF and it trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol VAVX.

QWhat is the fee waiver period and condition for the new VanEck Avalanche ETF?

AVanEck will waive the entire fee for the first $500 million of assets from January 26, 2026, to February 28, 2026. Assets over $500 million will be charged a fee of 0.20%.

QWhat percentage of its AVAX holdings can the VanEck ETF stake, and what potential market effect could this have?

AThe fund can stake up to 70% of its AVAX holdings. This could lock a significant portion of the supply and reduce the number of tokens available on the open market if demand holds up.

QAccording to the price analysis, what are the key technical indicators suggesting about AVAX's momentum?

AThe RSI at 39 indicates weak momentum in a neutral zone. The MACD shows strong selling pressure, confirmed by the MACD line being below the signal line.

QWhat are the identified critical support and resistance levels for the AVAX price?

AThe price has immediate support at $11, with a further pullback potentially exposing the $10 level. On the upside, a clear push above $13.00 could allow the price to move toward the $14.00-$15.00 range.

Letture associate

a16z: 5 Ways Blockchain Can Help AI Agent Infrastructure

Blockchain technology provides critical infrastructure for AI agents by addressing five key challenges: 1) Non-human identity: AI agents lack standardized, portable identity systems. Blockchain enables verifiable, cross-platform agent identities (like "Know Your Agent" frameworks) through cryptographic credentials and on-chain registries. 2) AI governance: When AI systems execute decisions, blockchain ensures transparency and prevents centralized control by recording actions on-chain and enabling auditable execution logs. 3) Payments: Stablecoins and crypto payments (e.g., x402, MPP) serve as default settlement layers for agent-to-agent commerce, enabling frictionless, programmable transactions for "headless" AI-native businesses. 4) Trust and verification: As AI scales, blockchain provides cryptographic proof of origin and auditable histories, making verification—not intelligence—the scarce resource. 5) User control: Crypto-native tools (e.g., delegation toolkits, intent-based architectures) allow users to set boundaries and maintain oversight over autonomous agents, minimizing blind trust. Together, blockchain and AI can create an economic infrastructure built on transparency, accountability, and user sovereignty.

marsbit8 min fa

a16z: 5 Ways Blockchain Can Help AI Agent Infrastructure

marsbit8 min fa

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit23 min fa

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit23 min fa

Will Solana Flip Ethereum Soon? SOL Takes First Step Toward Total Domination

Solana has significantly closed the gap with Ethereum, particularly in transaction volume, processing 9 billion transactions last month compared to Ethereum's 69 million. It has also surpassed Ethereum in cumulative lifetime transactions. This highlights Solana's high-throughput, low-cost architecture designed for real-time usage. Major partnerships, such as with Visa for stablecoin settlements and Western Union's upcoming stablecoin launch, underscore its growing institutional adoption. Solana has even overtaken Ethereum in real-world asset (RWA) holders. However, a complete "flippening" depends on broader factors like capital inflows, developer activity, and network confidence. While Solana's smaller market cap suggests greater growth potential, Ethereum's Layer-2 scaling strategy strengthens its ecosystem. The outcome remains uncertain, with trade-offs on both sides.

bitcoinist30 min fa

Will Solana Flip Ethereum Soon? SOL Takes First Step Toward Total Domination

bitcoinist30 min fa

Spending $200 to Buy Stars, Scamming VCs Out of Tens of Millions: The Entire GitHub Fake Star Industry Exposed

A peer-reviewed study from Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) reveals that GitHub hosts approximately 6 million fake Stars, involving 18,600 repositories and 301,000 accounts, with AI/LLM projects being the largest non-malicious category for fake engagement. The fake Star market has exploded, with prices as low as $0.03 per Star. Research shows that venture capital firms, such as Redpoint Ventures, use GitHub Star counts as a key metric for evaluating startups, with median Stars at 2,850 for seed-stage funding. For less than $200, a project can artificially meet this threshold, distorting investment landscape. Over a dozen websites openly sell GitHub Stars, and fake Star activity saw explosive growth in 2024. AI-related repositories were among the most heavily affected. Despite GitHub’s policies against fake engagement, enforcement remains inconsistent: while 90% of flagged repositories were deleted, only 57% of involved accounts were suspended. The report highlights how purchased Stars can manipulate GitHub’s Trending algorithm and influence VC funding decisions, creating a cycle where artificial metrics attract real investment.

marsbit33 min fa

Spending $200 to Buy Stars, Scamming VCs Out of Tens of Millions: The Entire GitHub Fake Star Industry Exposed

marsbit33 min fa

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbit44 min fa

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbit44 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures