Valuation at $1.25 Billion Post-SPAC Listing, Securitize to Issue "True Equity" On-Chain Stocks

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2025-12-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-19

Introduzione

Securitize, a major RWA (Real World Assets) platform, plans to launch native on-chain stock products by Q1 2026. Unlike synthetic or beneficial-rights models that track prices or represent indirect claims, Securitize will issue legally recognized shares directly on-chain, with tokens representing full shareholder rights including dividends and voting. These shares will be recorded on the issuer’s official cap table. Valuing compliance and integration with traditional finance, Securitize is an SEC-registered transfer agent. It has already tokenized over $3 billion in assets, including BlackRock’s $1.7+ billion BUIDL money market fund, and works with major institutions like Apollo, KKR, and VanEck. In October, Securitize announced plans to go public via a SPAC merger with Cantor Equity Partners II at a $1.25 billion valuation (ticker: SECZ). Backed by investors such as Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and ARK Invest, the company is positioning itself as a bridge between traditional finance and decentralized systems, emphasizing regulatory alignment and institutional adoption.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

On December 17, the RWA platform Securitize announced plans to launch native on-chain stock products in the coming months, targeting the first quarter of 2026. Unlike most "stock tokenization" solutions on the market, Securitize will directly issue real, regulated shares on the blockchain, simultaneously recording them in the issuer's official share register; its tokens represent full shareholder rights, including dividends, proxy voting, and more.

On October 28 this year, Securitize disclosed that it would go public via a SPAC merger, with a post-merger valuation estimated at $1.25 billion and a stock ticker of SECZ. As a key player in the tokenized money market fund space, Securitize has partnered with traditional asset management institutions such as BlackRock, Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane, and VanEck, with cumulative tokenized asset scale exceeding $3 billion.

Amid the ongoing heat of the RWA narrative, Securitize, with its frequent moves, has become a market focus. Odaily Planet Daily will analyze it from a business perspective to help readers gain an in-depth understanding of the company's layout and prospects.

Native On-Chain Stocks: Not "Price Mapping," But Legally Recognized Shares

To understand the importance of Securitize's product path, it must first be placed within the overall structure of the current stock tokenization track. Most existing stock tokenization platforms can be broadly divided into two mainstream models.

The first is the synthetic model. Early examples like Mirror Protocol and Synthetix fall into this category, where tokens track stock prices through derivative structures or oracle mechanisms, providing only price exposure without involving any real shares. Such products lack shareholder rights, carry counterparty risk and pricing deviations, and are essentially derivatives rather than equity.

The second is the beneficial interest model. For example, MSX typically involves the platform or a third-party custodian holding the real shares (usually 1:1 backed), issuing tokens that represent beneficial interests or claims to these shares. Holders gain economic exposure (e.g., price movements, possibly dividend pass-through) but are not direct legal owners; the official share register records the custodian, not the token holder.

Different from these two paths, Securitize is attempting a third model—the native on-chain stock model. What Securitize plans to issue will be shares recognized in law as real stock, issued natively directly on the blockchain, and simultaneously recorded in the issuing company's official share register. Token holders possess full shareholder rights, including dividends, proxy voting, etc. More crucially, Securitize itself, as an SEC-registered transfer agent, ensures that token holders are the direct legal owners, not holding indirectly via an intermediary or SPV. In other words, this type of asset is neither a price tracker nor an IOU" from a custodian.

However, it is undeniable that the complexity of the native on-chain stock model is significantly higher than that of synthetic or beneficial interest schemes. It must not only solve the problems of on-chain issuance and instant settlement but also simultaneously comply with a series of traditional financial rules such as securities regulation, corporate law, and transfer agent systems, achieving seamless integration with existing financial infrastructure. In practical terms, this means higher compliance costs, longer advancement cycles, and each step being exposed to regulatory and institutional friction.

In contrast, the advantages of synthetic or beneficial interest schemes are obvious: faster implementation, lighter structure, lower cost, and easier achievement of 24/7 trading and DeFi compatibility. The path chosen by Securitize aims not to "circumvent regulation" but to attempt, within the system, to truly eliminate the long-standing structural gap between the traditional financial system and the on-chain system.

It is under this choice that Securitize's position in the RWA track becomes clearer.

Securitize is Becoming One of the "Standard Answers" for RWA Infrastructure

Securitize was founded in November 2017 by Carlos Domingo and Jamie Finn, headquartered in San Francisco, California, USA. The company focuses on using blockchain technology to transform traditional financial assets (such as stocks, funds, bonds, private equity, etc.) into compliant digital securities.

This positioning directly determines Securitize's partners and business form. Securitize's most well-known case is providing tokenization services for BlackRock's BUIDL money market fund. To date, the fund's size has exceeded $1.7 billion, making it the largest tokenized money fund product in the current RWA market.

In addition, Securitize has partnered with several traditional asset management institutions including Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane, and VanEck. Official data shows that its cumulative tokenized asset scale has surpassed $3 billion. If the early stages of RWA were more about "conceptual feasibility," then Securitize's business has begun to enter the verification stage of "institutional feasibility."

This "bridge-type" positioning is also clearly reflected in Securitize's financing and shareholder structure.

Public information shows that Securitize has raised approximately $122 million to $147 million through multiple rounds of private equity financing. Early investors mostly came from the crypto industry itself, including Coinbase, Ripple, etc. As the RWA narrative gradually clarified, its shareholder structure also changed significantly, with traditional financial giants such as Morgan Stanley and BlackRock entering one after another. The number of investors exceeds 50, and it has also received significant holdings from Cathie Wood's ARK Invest.

This process from "crypto circle recognition" to "Wall Street endorsement" is not accidental but a natural result of its business path and institutional choices.

Under This Logic, Moving Towards the Capital Market is Not Surprising

On October 28, Securitize announced that it would go public through a merger with special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. After the transaction is completed, the company's valuation is expected to reach $1.25 billion, and it plans to trade under the ticker symbol SECZ.

Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. (NSDQ:CEPT) is sponsored by a company under financial services giant Cantor Fitzgerald, with its head being Brandon Lutnick, son of the U.S. Secretary of Commerce. Notably, Twenty One, the third-largest bitcoin reserve company, also went public by merging with another SPAC under Cantor Fitzgerald, showing the group's continued layout in the crypto asset field.

To support the listing and public market operations, Securitize has also simultaneously strengthened its compliance and governance capabilities, announcing the appointment of former PayPal digital asset legal head Jerome Roche as General Counsel, preparing for future continuous reporting and regulatory communication on Nasdaq.

Conclusion

Returning to Securitize itself, as a leading project in the RWA track, the market's earliest expectation for it might have been just when it would issue a token. But judging from today's progress, this expectation itself might just be the inertial thinking of the crypto market.

What Securitize is ultimately moving towards is not a narrative stage centered around a token, but the larger structure formed by the capital market and regulatory system. But this choice itself is not surprising. Because from the beginning, the role it has played has been closer to a bridge connecting TradFi and DeFi.

In this sense, Securitize's development path may reflect the profound transformation the RWA narrative is undergoing, moving from imagination to reality, from concept to institution. How far this path can go depends not only on the expansion speed of a certain company but also on whether the traditional financial system is truly willing to reserve a realistic space for "native on-chain assets."

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the key difference between Securitize's planned on-chain stock product and existing stock tokenization models?

ASecuritize's native on-chain stock represents a direct, legally recognized share of equity issued natively on the blockchain and recorded on the issuer's official cap table, granting holders full shareholder rights like dividends and voting. This differs from synthetic models (which are just price-tracking derivatives) and beneficial interest models (where a custodian holds the real stock and issues an IOU token).

QWhat major traditional asset management firms has Securitize partnered with for its tokenization services?

ASecuritize has partnered with major traditional asset managers including BlackRock, Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane, and VanEck.

QHow is Securitize planning to become a publicly traded company and what is its expected valuation?

ASecuritize is planning to go public through a merger with a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) called Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. The combined company is expected to have a valuation of $1.25 billion and trade under the ticker symbol SECZ.

QWhat is the total value of assets that Securitize has tokenized so far, and what is its most prominent product?

ASecuritize has cumulatively tokenized over $3 billion in assets. Its most prominent product is the tokenized BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL), which is the largest tokenized money market fund in the RWA market with over $1.7 billion in assets.

QWhat regulatory and infrastructure challenges does the native on-chain stock model face compared to other tokenization approaches?

AThe native on-chain stock model faces higher complexity and compliance costs because it must satisfy securities regulations, corporate law, and transfer agent requirements, and integrate with existing financial infrastructure. This is more challenging than synthetic or beneficial interest models, which are faster to launch, cheaper, and more easily compatible with DeFi but do not provide direct legal ownership.

Letture associate

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit15 min fa

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit15 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit30 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit30 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片