Valentine’s Day Crypto Warning: US Attorney Issues Crypto-Fueled Romance Scam Alert

ccn.comPubblicato 2026-02-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-14

Introduzione

The US Department of Justice has issued a Valentine’s Day warning about cryptocurrency-fueled romance scams. Fraudsters typically approach victims on dating sites or social media, using fake profiles and stolen photos to build emotional trust over weeks or months. They then fabricate emergencies and request payments in crypto, gift cards, or wire transfers—methods that are difficult to reverse. Recent cases include a Colorado man who lost $1.4 million after meeting a woman on a dating app who persuaded him to invest in crypto. According to Chainalysis, crypto scams received at least $14 billion in 2025, with impersonation scams surging by 1,400% compared to the previous year. Authorities advise conducting reverse image searches, consulting trusted friends before sending money, and reporting suspicious activity to the FBI.

Key Takeaways

  • The Department of Justice has issued a crypto warning as Valentine’s Day hits.
  • Real-world losses are escalating.
  • Crypto scam activity surged in 2025.

U.S. federal prosecutors are warning Americans not to let Valentine’s Day turn into a costly heartbreak, as romance scammers increasingly demand payment in cryptocurrency.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio on Thursday urged the public to remain vigilant against online crypto romance scams that exploit victims’ trust and emotions.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="6970dbafcbd599f15ce64045" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=6985b71f73f50d4865cba0f2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
ChangeNow<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6970dbafcbd599f15ce64045" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=6985b71f73f50d4865cba0f2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

ChangeNow

promotions
Receive 0.4% of the volume from each transaction with your referral link.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6970dbafcbd599f15ce64045" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=6985b71f73f50d4865cba0f2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive 0.4% of the volume from each transaction with your referral link.
Coins
217
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
89
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

DOJ Flags Valentine’s Day Crypto Warning

Federal prosecutors said fraudsters typically approach victims on dating websites, social media platforms, and messaging apps, posing as romantic partners.

In a stark warning , titled “Cupid Doesn’t Ask for Crypto,” the DOJ explained how bad actors cultivate relationships over weeks or months before fabricating emergencies, travel needs, or medical crises.

Among the clearest warning signs, according to the Justice Department, are requests for payment in crypto, gift cards, or wire transfers, methods favored by scammers because they are hard to reverse.

The office said scammers frequently create fake profiles using stolen photos, claim to work overseas in the military or international business, and profess deep affection quickly.

The DOJ has issued a Valentine’s Day warning about crypto. | Source: DOJ

They often move conversations off mainstream dating platforms to private messaging apps and avoid meeting in person.

“Romance scammers are not looking for love — they are looking for money,” said U.S. Attorney David M. Toepfer for the Northern District of Ohio.

Adding: “They prey on trust and emotion and often target older Americans and vulnerable individuals. We urge everyone to slow down, verify identities, and never send money to someone they have not met in person.”

Regional Cases Underscore Growing Threat

Victims are advised to conduct reverse image searches of profile photos, consult trusted friends before sending funds, and report suspicious activity to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3).

In the report, authorities cited recent regional cases, including a Ghanaian national charged in an alleged scheme that took more than $8 million from elderly victims.

Last September, a Colorado man was also reported to have lost $1.4 million after falling victim to a crypto-linked romance scam.

The man, who first spoke to 9News , said he met a woman on Ashley Madison, a website marketed to married people seeking affairs.

After weeks of video chatting and exchanging photos, their conversations shifted to the woman’s interest in crypto and her view of it as a good opportunity for him.

Over roughly six weeks, the man said he made four separate cryptocurrency transfers, ultimately losing $1.4 million in retirement funds and life savings.

Crypto Scams Surge in 2025

The warning comes amid a broader surge in cryptocurrency-related fraud.

Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis said in its 2026 report that crypto scams received at least $14 billion in on-chain funds last year, up sharply from initial 2024 estimates of $9.9 billion.

Based on historical trends, the firm projected that the 2025 total could exceed $17 billion as more illicit wallets are identified.

The average scam payment rose to $2,764 in 2025 from $782 in 2024, a 253% year-on-year increase, according to Chainalysis.

Impersonation scams, also known as Pig Butchering scams, recorded a 1,400% surge in inflows compared with the previous year.

Top Trending Crypto Articles
  • Best Exchanges Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here
  • Buy Crypto Fast How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now
  • Safe Crypto Gambling See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main warning issued by the U.S. Department of Justice regarding Valentine's Day?

AThe U.S. Department of Justice has issued a warning about romance scammers who increasingly demand payment in cryptocurrency, urging the public to remain vigilant against online crypto romance scams that exploit victims' trust and emotions.

QWhat are some of the red flags mentioned by the DOJ to identify crypto romance scams?

ARed flags include requests for payment in cryptocurrency, gift cards, or wire transfers; scammers creating fake profiles using stolen photos; claiming to work overseas in the military or international business; professing deep affection quickly; and moving conversations off mainstream platforms to private messaging apps while avoiding in-person meetings.

QHow much did crypto scams receive in on-chain funds in 2025 according to Chainalysis?

AAccording to Chainalysis, crypto scams received at least $14 billion in on-chain funds in 2025, with projections that the total could exceed $17 billion as more illicit wallets are identified.

QWhat was the average scam payment in 2025 compared to 2024?

AThe average scam payment rose to $2,764 in 2025, which is a 253% increase from the $782 average in 2024.

QWhat advice does the DOJ give to avoid falling victim to these scams?

AThe DOJ advises victims to conduct reverse image searches of profile photos, consult trusted friends before sending funds, and report suspicious activity to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). They also emphasize never sending money to someone they have not met in person.

Letture associate

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit23 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit23 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手47 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手47 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 h fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片