USDT Supply Shrinks by $5.5 Billion While Stablecoin Turnover Hits Record High

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-29

Introduzione

The supply of stablecoins has contracted for the first time in years, with total market capitalization falling 4.3% from its May peak to $308.5 billion. Despite this decline, June saw a record $1.83 trillion in adjusted transaction volume for stablecoins, a 60% increase from May. This divergence suggests a shift in usage patterns: less capital is sitting idle, while the remaining supply circulates more rapidly through payment and trading systems. Specifically, the supply of Tether's USDT decreased from approximately $189.54 billion to $184 billion between May 1 and July 29, while Circle's USDC supply fell from $77.27 billion to $72.41 billion. Part of this capital appears to have moved into tokenized Treasury products, a sector whose value has grown to over $16 billion, partly driven by regulations like the 2025 GENIUS Act that prohibit interest payments on payment-focused stablecoins. Transaction velocity is emerging as a key metric, with stablecoins now turning over about six times per month—double the rate from two years ago. USDC, despite having a smaller supply than USDT, processed about $1.21 trillion in adjusted volume in June, leading in settlement activity. While a significant portion of on-chain volume may not represent genuine economic payments, identifiable real-world payments have grown sharply, reaching an estimated $390 billion in 2025. The data indicates stablecoins are evolving from static collateral into active financial infrastructure.

The total supply of stablecoins has declined for the first time in years, but this decrease may not indicate as much about demand as it seems.

The overall market capitalization has fallen by approximately 4.3% from its May peak of $322.41 billion to $308.5 billion. In June alone, the drop amounted to $7.7 billion—the most significant monthly decline since the Terra crash in May 2022.

Source: Defillama

At the same time, the adjusted transaction volume for stablecoins reached a record $1.83 trillion in June. This is 60% higher than May's figure and more than double the level recorded a year ago.

This discrepancy points to a change in the nature of stablecoin usage. Fewer dollars are sitting idle, while the remaining supply is moving faster through payment, trading, and settlement systems.

Source: Defillama

Idle Balances Move to Yield-Bearing Assets

The supply of $USDT by Tether decreased from $189.54 billion as of May 1 to approximately $184 billion as of July 29. Over the same period, the supply of $USDC by Circle dropped from $77.27 billion to $72.41 billion. This reduction remains moderate compared to the market's 26% crash in 2022.

Apparently, some capital has flowed into tokenized Treasury products, which offer yields not available for payment stablecoins. According to rwa.xyz, the volume of this sector has grown to over $16 billion compared to roughly $11 billion in March.

Source: rwa.xyz

The GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, prohibits issuers from paying interest directly on payment stablecoins. This structure encourages treasurers to keep savings in tokenized funds, holding stablecoins only when payments need to be made.

Turnover Velocity Replaces Market Cap as Key Metric

According to a Standard Chartered report from March 2026, stablecoin turnover is now about six times per month. This is roughly double the rate from two years ago. Visa data also shows that each dollar in a stablecoin moves much more frequently than a dollar stored in an ordinary U.S. bank account.

$USDC has become the leading settlement asset, despite its supply being smaller than that of $USDT. In June, it processed about $1.21 trillion in adjusted volume, compared to $576 billion for $USDT.

However, not all blockchain transfers represent real economic payments. Automated activity, exchange transfers, and wash trades can inflate the raw figures.

According to a Forbes report, estimates by McKinsey and Artemis suggest that identifiable real-world payments accounted for about $390 billion in 2025. Business-to-business transactions made up $226 billion, while payroll and remittance payments were approximately $90 billion.

The share of payments is still small but has grown sharply over two years.

Stablecoin market capitalization still matters, as issuers earn interest on reserves. However, for networks, processors, and financial platforms, transaction frequency may become a more valuable metric. June data indicates that stablecoins are transforming from 'frozen' collateral into active financial infrastructure.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what is the key change in the nature of stablecoin usage indicated by the data?

AThe data indicates a change in the nature of stablecoin usage: fewer dollars are sitting idle, while the remaining volume is moving faster through payment, trading, and settlement systems. This is shown by the supply shrinking while transaction turnover hits a record high.

QWhat is one major reason suggested in the article for the migration of capital away from payment stablecoins like USDT and USDC?

AOne major reason is the flow of capital into tokenized Treasury products, which offer yields not available to payment stablecoins. This was further encouraged by the GENIUS Act signed in July 2025, which prohibits issuers from paying interest directly on payment stablecoins.

QWhy does the article suggest that transaction turnover (velocity) is becoming a more valuable metric than market capitalization for certain entities?

AFor networks, processors, and financial platforms, the frequency of transactions (turnover velocity) may become a more valuable metric than market capitalization because it reflects active usage and utility within the financial infrastructure, rather than just stored value.

QWhich stablecoin processed a higher adjusted transaction volume in June, USDT or USDC, despite having a smaller supply?

AUSDC processed a higher adjusted transaction volume in June (approximately $1.21 trillion) compared to USDT ($576 billion), even though USDC's supply is smaller than that of USDT.

QWhat does the article cite as a potential factor that can inflate raw on-chain transaction figures?

AThe article states that automated activity, exchange transfers, and wash trading can inflate the raw on-chain transaction figures, meaning not all blockchain transfers represent real economic payments.

Letture associate

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

AI Is Eliminating 'Entertainment for the Poor' This article discusses the rising cost of video gaming, arguing that AI is making digital entertainment increasingly expensive. It follows the example of a frugal gamer who, accustomed to waiting for discounts and buying second-hand games, now faces a new reality. Video game consoles like the PS5 Pro and Switch 2 are increasing in price post-launch, breaking the traditional pattern of降价 over time. Game prices are also rising, with major titles like GTA 6 launching at $80. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards eliminating physical media, exemplified by Sony's plan to stop PS disc production by 2028. This shift blocks the二手 market, a key cost-saving avenue for players. Even Valve's anticipated affordable Steam Machine launched with a high price and disappointing specs. Manufacturers cite inflation, supply chain issues, and rising development costs, but a core driver is the AI boom. AI data centers now consume semiconductor and memory resources once prioritized for consumer electronics like game consoles. This competition from a more profitable sector drives up hardware costs. Additionally, developing modern AAA games with massive teams over many years is astronomically expensive, pushing publishers towards digital-only distribution and subscription models to secure recurring revenue. The article suggests this trend extends beyond gaming. Video streaming, music platforms, cloud storage, and AI tools are increasingly locked behind complex subscription tiers. While AI promises future benefits, it is currently making digital entertainment and services more costly. The era of progressively cheaper, accessible online entertainment is ending, forcing consumers to pay more upfront for future technological promises.

marsbit23 min fa

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

marsbit23 min fa

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

South Korea's AI-driven bull market has taken a sharp downturn, severely impacting SK Hynix's stock and prompting regulatory tightening in both Hong Kong and South Korea on single-stock leveraged products. The CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) ETF, once the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF with over HKD 130 billion in assets, saw its value plummet by over 80% as SK Hynix shares fell nearly 46% from their June peak, erasing more than HKD 100 billion. In response, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) revised its regulatory framework. Starting August 3rd, fixed 2x leverage for single-stock leveraged and inverse products will shift to a dynamic "flexible leverage" mechanism, where daily leverage can vary up to a maximum of 2x. This aims to balance market development with investor protection but has sparked debate about changes to the products' core features and potential reduced appeal for risk-seeking investors. Simultaneously, South Korean authorities announced plans to further restrict single-stock leveraged ETFs following two consecutive days of market circuit breakers. Proposed measures include capping individual investors' allocations to such products at 20% of their total financial investment assets, increasing trading costs, and enhancing suitability requirements. The Finance Minister publicly apologized, acknowledging insufficient initial risk assessment. Analysts note that while the long-term fundamentals for South Korean semiconductor firms like SK Hynix remain solid, short-term market volatility is heightened due to concentrated leveraged bets and shifting global risk sentiment. The regulatory moves in both markets signal a clear shift from encouraging innovation towards prioritizing risk control, reminding investors of the amplified risks inherent in leveraged products.

marsbit29 min fa

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

marsbit29 min fa

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

"The Privatization of Human Civilization" The article critiques how AI companies like Anthropic are systematically acquiring and digitizing millions of books—sometimes by destroying physical copies—to build proprietary training datasets for models like Claude. While a lawsuit resulted in a settlement, the author argues the deeper issue transcends copyright: it is about the privatization and centralized control of human knowledge and civilization. This process coincides with a powerful Silicon Valley ideology, exemplified by Marc Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" and movements like e/acc (Effective Accelerationism). This worldview frames technological growth and speed as inherently moral, portraying caution, regulation, and public dissent as obstacles to progress. It often envisions intelligence itself, rather than human well-being, as the ultimate goal, potentially sidelining present human concerns. Figures like Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin express skepticism towards democratic processes as too slow, suggesting more centralized, founder-led governance is efficient. This logic extends to AI, where a small team within a company defines the model's "constitution"—its rules, values, and definitions of truth and safety—effectively governing how millions understand the world. Thus, the scanned books symbolize a new form of control. Knowledge isn't erased but is ingested into private, opaque systems. The original, decentralized, and contestable nature of books and public knowledge is replaced by a curated, company-controlled output. The public's access to their own cultural heritage becomes mediated by corporate AI, which remembers civilization only in the form its creators dictate. This is not book-burning but a subtler, potentially more complete privatization of human memory and understanding.

marsbit38 min fa

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

marsbit38 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片