USDC vs. USDT: $70.2T volume drives shift as Circle expands into Africa

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-25

Introduzione

Circle partners with Sasai Fintech (Cassava Technologies) to expand USDC into Africa, aiming to revolutionize cross-border payments by making them faster, cheaper, and more reliable. This integration into Sasai's mobile platform addresses high fees (often over 7%) and slow traditional systems. The move occurs as stablecoins process $70.2T in annual volume, with USDC gaining market share against USDT, signaling a shift toward reliable, transparent systems. However, Circle faces regulatory challenges in the U.S., including concerns from the upcoming CLARITY Act, which contributed to a recent 20% stock drop. The expansion highlights a strategic focus on high-growth markets like Africa despite domestic uncertainties.

While many are currently concerned about Circle’s stock performance on the NYSE, the company’s partnership with Sasai Fintech, a business of Cassava Technologies, tells an interesting story.

This move isn’t just about expanding into Africa; it’s aimed at tackling a long‐standing challenge: cross‐border payments that remain slow, costly, and inefficient. The plan is to bring USDC into Sasai’s mobile platform, which already supports payments and remittances across multiple African countries.

USDC x Sasai’s partnership: A green flag

Currently, fees can go above 7%, so using a stablecoin like USDC can make transactions faster, cheaper, and more reliable.

By adding USDC into a mobile platform that already supports fast-moving trade, it removes the delays and high costs of traditional systems, where transactions can take days.

Additionally, the partnership is also meant to offer a stable and transparent way to make cross-border payments. This would, in turn, help businesses avoid local currency swings while staying connected to the global market.

Executives weighing in

Remarking on the same, Strive Masiyiwa, Founder and Executive Chairman at Cassava Technologies, said,

Africa’s digital economy is entering a new era, propelled by entrepreneurship, a mobile-first generation, and the acceleration of intra-regional trade.

Adding more to the sentiment, Jeremy Allaire, co-founder and CEO at Circle, noted,

Working with Cassava, we can extend the benefits of USDC and onchain infrastructure into high-growth payment corridors to deliver always-on global connectivity.

Stablecoin’s market dynamics: USDC vs. USDT

The partnership comes at an important time for stablecoins, which have handled a huge $70.2 trillion in transactions over the past year. While USDT was leading for most of 2025, things started to change in early 2026.

Even though total activity slowed a bit in March after a strong February, USDC has started catching up and even briefly matched USDT’s share.

Source: Visa on-chain analytics

This rise in USDC signals a shift away from pure speculation toward more reliable systems, something Circle is now bringing to markets like Africa.

Regulatory clarity and more

While Circle expands into Africa, its position in the United States has become shaky due to new regulations.

In 2025, the GENIUS Act gave a positive direction for stablecoins by supporting dollar-backed digital assets. But now, the upcoming CLARITY Act is creating fresh concerns.

This has made investors nervous, as it could directly impact how companies like Circle generate revenue. As a result, Circle’s stock (CRCL) recently saw a sharp drop of nearly 20% on the 24th of March, closing at $101.17.

All this together shows that Circle is at a turning point, dealing with regulatory challenges in the U.S. while building a strong, usage-driven future in markets like Africa.


Final Summary

  • Integrating USDC into Sasai’s mobile network could cut remittance costs and speed up settlements.
  • The rising competition between USDC and USDT reflects demand for transparency and regulatory alignment.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the primary goal of Circle's partnership with Sasai Fintech in Africa?

AThe primary goal is to tackle the challenges of slow, costly, and inefficient cross-border payments by integrating USDC into Sasai's mobile platform to make transactions faster, cheaper, and more reliable.

QAccording to the article, what significant shift in the stablecoin market does the rise of USDC signal?

AThe rise of USDC signals a shift away from pure speculation toward more reliable and transparent systems for cross-border payments and remittances.

QWhat recent U.S. regulatory development has created concerns for Circle and its investors?

AThe upcoming CLARITY Act has created fresh concerns and investor nervousness, as it could directly impact how companies like Circle generate revenue, contributing to a sharp drop in its stock price.

QHow much transaction volume have stablecoins handled over the past year, as mentioned in the article?

AStablecoins have handled a huge $70.2 trillion in transactions over the past year.

QWhich two key benefits does the article suggest the USDC integration will bring to African markets?

AThe integration is expected to cut remittance costs and speed up settlement times for cross-border payments.

Letture associate

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News33 min fa

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News33 min fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News51 min fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News51 min fa

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit1 h fa

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片