USDC and CCTP Are Coming to Morph, Advancing Settlement for Payments

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-26

Introduzione

USDC and the Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) are launching on Morph, a payments-first Ethereum-based settlement layer. This integration brings a canonical, dollar-denominated stablecoin and standardized cross-chain infrastructure to the network. USDC will be natively issued on Morph by Circle’s regulated affiliates, providing a transparent and reliable settlement asset for applications. CCTP enables secure cross-chain transfers of USDC via a burn-and-mint mechanism, preserving asset integrity. This infrastructure supports key use cases including crypto cards, cross-border remittance, payment gateways, and DeFi trading. To further accelerate adoption, Morph has launched a $150 million Payment Accelerator program, positioning the network as a scalable settlement layer for real-world financial activity.

Singapore, Singapore, February 26th, 2026, Chainwire

Stablecoins have become a foundational layer for settlement, moving value across payments, remittances, and treasury operations worldwide. As these flows grow, the infrastructure behind dollar-denominated stablecoins matters as much as the assets themselves.

USDC and Circle Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) will be launching on Morph, bringing payment stablecoins and standardized cross-chain settlement to infrastructure built for payments.

USDC on Morph

USDC will be issued on Morph by Circle’s regulated affiliates, establishing it as a settlement asset across the network.

Issuance provides a consistent foundation for dollar-denominated activity. USDC on Morph will be canonical, with uniform behavior across applications and clear provenance at the protocol level.

For developers building payment applications, this simplifies dollar settlement by eliminating the need to manage bridge risk or fragmented liquidity. For institutions operating treasury systems, merchant platforms, or cross-border payment rails, USDC will provide access to a transparent stablecoin supported by Circle’s established on- and off-ramp infrastructure.

“Morph has spent the last several months meaningfully investing in our network’s core offering. As we have engaged with global leaders in the payment space, it’s clear that they need a widely-used, dollar-denominated stablecoin to meet their needs. For us, working with Circle to bring USDC to Morph was a clear choice,” said Colin Goltra, CEO of Morph.

CCTP: Cross-Chain Infrastructure

CCTP will enable USDC to move between supported blockchains using a burn-and-mint process that preserves supply integrity.

When USDC is transferred to Morph via CCTP, it will be burned on the source chain and minted natively on Morph. The asset will remain fully backed and verifiable under the same reserve framework.

Applications will be able to use Standard Transfer or Fast Transfer depending on their security and latency requirements, while maintaining consistent settlement behavior across networks.

Use Cases Across Payments

USDC and CCTP will support a range of payment and financial applications that rely on dependable dollar settlement and cross-chain access.

  • Crypto Cards and Neobanks

Card programs and digital issuing platforms will be able to settle balances in USDC while enabling users to fund accounts from supported blockchains via CCTP.

  • Cross-Border Remittance

Money movement platforms will benefit from transparent, stablecoin-based settlement with near-instant cross-chain transfers across regions.

  • Payment Gateways

Checkout providers will be able to accept payments from users across multiple chains while settling in USDC, simplifying reconciliation and reducing FX delays for merchants.

  • DeFi and Trading

USDC will serve as collateral and a settlement asset across lending protocols and decentralized exchanges, with CCTP supporting liquidity movement between Morph and other supported blockchains, including connections to the Bitget ecosystem.

Building the Settlement Layer for Digital Dollars

To support teams bringing payment flows on-chain, Morph has launched the $150 million Payment Accelerator, providing funding, technical support, and access to payment partners and institutional onramps.

Together, USDC, standardized cross-chain settlement through CCTP, and direct ecosystem support position Morph as a settlement layer for real financial activity.

As stablecoins continue to underpin payments, treasury operations, and onchain commerce, Morph is building the execution environment at institutional scale.

Money at the speed of life.

About Morph

Morph is an Ethereum-based, payments-first settlement layer and the native on-chain home of BGB, focused on building the foundation for global consumer finance on-chain. Morph supports real-world financial activity across payments, savings, identity, and rewards, enabling scalable, on-chain settlement for consumer and business use. Guided by the Morph Foundation, the network connects more than 120 million users through the Bitget and Bitget Wallet ecosystems.

Contact

PR team
drew.azarias@morphl2.io

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two main components that are being launched on Morph to advance settlement for payments?

AUSDC and the Circle Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) are being launched on Morph.

QHow does the Circle Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) work when transferring USDC to Morph?

ACCTP uses a burn-and-mint process; USDC is burned on the source chain and minted natively on Morph, preserving supply integrity and keeping the asset fully backed under the same reserve framework.

QAccording to the article, what are two specific payment use cases that will benefit from USDC and CCTP on Morph?

ATwo specific use cases are Crypto Cards/Neobanks, which can settle balances in USDC and enable users to fund accounts from other chains, and Cross-Border Remittance platforms, which benefit from transparent, stablecoin-based settlement with near-instant cross-chain transfers.

QWhat initiative has Morph launched to support teams building payment flows on-chain, and what is its value?

AMorph has launched the $150 million Payment Accelerator, which provides funding, technical support, and access to payment partners and institutional onramps.

QWhat is the role of Circle's regulated affiliates in relation to USDC on the Morph network?

ACircle's regulated affiliates will be responsible for issuing USDC on Morph, establishing it as a canonical settlement asset across the network.

Letture associate

Patrick Witt Delays Military Training to Lead White House Push for CLARITY Act

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has delayed his military training with the Georgia Army National Guard to lead White House negotiations on the CLARITY Act. With the Senate entering recess on August 8, this period is seen as crucial for advancing the bill, which aims to establish clear regulatory rules for the digital asset market in the United States. This marks the second time Witt has postponed his military service for this purpose. His role as the administration's lead negotiator has gained increased importance following the impending departure of Deputy Director Harry Jung, ensuring leadership continuity during critical legislative efforts. The White House is prioritizing the passage of this significant cryptocurrency regulation before the Senate break.

TheNewsCrypto9 min fa

Patrick Witt Delays Military Training to Lead White House Push for CLARITY Act

TheNewsCrypto9 min fa

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit13 min fa

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit13 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit13 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit13 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News24 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News24 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit40 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit40 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片