US Stocks Surge 16% in Two Months: Only 4 Occurrences in History, the Most Recent Was Just Before the 1987 Crash

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-03

Introduzione

U.S. stocks have surged 16% over April and May, a gain seen only four times since WWII, according to Deutsche Bank strategist Henry Allen. Three prior instances followed recessions, but the sole non-recession precedent was in early 1987, months before the "Black Monday" crash. The current rally is underpinned by AI enthusiasm and strong data, but its speed without an economic recovery is historically unprecedented. Meanwhile, credit spreads remain near record lows despite growing consumer strain—the U.S. savings rate hit just 2.6% in April, a level last seen before the Global Financial Crisis, and consumer sentiment is at its lowest since 1952. Market risks are concentrated. While stocks and credit markets appear immune to geopolitical tensions, sovereign bonds tell a different story. Treasury yields have tracked oil prices and recently hit multi-year highs, creating a widening divergence with equities. Surprisingly stable oil prices, despite the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, have been a key pillar for risk assets. However, if the blockage persists, this support could fade, raising the risk of a stagflation shock not currently priced in.

Original Author: Zhao Ying

Original Source: Wall Street News

The recent strong rally in U.S. stocks is triggering historical alarms. The S&P 500 index has accumulated a 16% gain from April to May, a magnitude of increase that has occurred only 4 times since World War II. Three of those instances happened during recovery phases following economic recessions. The sole precedent not in a post-recession context occurred just months before the "Black Monday" crash in 1987.

Deutsche Bank macro strategist Henry Allen points out that the current rally is not taking place against a backdrop of post-recession recovery, making the historical comparison particularly stark. Meanwhile, credit spreads remain at historically low levels, but pressure signals from the consumer side are accumulating, expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate hikes are heating up, and the divergence between sovereign bond markets and stock markets continues to widen.

With multiple risk factors converging, market tail risks are becoming exceptionally concentrated. Henry Allen wrote in the report, "The tail risks in the current distribution are exceptionally prominent, both at the geopolitical level and at the market level."

Historical Precedents Are Rare, Only One Non-Recession Example Exists

The S&P 500's two-month gain of 16% from April to May has only 4 precedents since WWII.

Three of them occurred during powerful rebounds following recessions: the post-COVID-19 recovery from April to May 2020, the post-global financial crisis rebound from March to April 2009, and the recovery rally following the first oil crisis from January to February 1975.

The 4th instance was from January to February 1987. That was just months before October's "Black Monday" — the day the S&P 500 plunged 20% in a single session.

Henry Allen emphasizes that the current rally has its fundamental support, including high enthusiasm for artificial intelligence and strong economic data, but "the pace of gains itself has broken all recent precedents." In an economy not emerging from a recession, a rebound of this speed has never ended well in history.

Furthermore, the S&P 500 is on track to achieve its fourth consecutive year of double-digit gains, a record not seen since the late 1990s.

Excessive Optimism in Credit Markets, Consumer Pressure Signals Overlooked

The strength in equities has also spread to credit markets. Credit spreads in both the US and Europe are currently narrower than before the US-Iran conflict erupted, showing the market's high tolerance for risk.

However, warning signals at the consumer level are accumulating. The US savings rate was just 2.6% in April, a similarly low level historically seen in only two other periods: a single month in 2022 (when pandemic-era excess savings were being depleted) and just before the global financial crisis erupted. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index hit its all-time low in May since records began in 1952.

The monetary policy environment is also tightening. The European Central Bank is widely expected to raise interest rates this month, and market bets on Federal Reserve rate hikes in 2026 are heating up — with US PCE inflation reaching 3.8% year-on-year in April, providing support for this expectation.

Henry Allen notes that historically, hawkish stances from the Federal Reserve have often coincided with widening credit spreads, as seen in 2022, late 2018, and from 2015 to 2016. The current calm in credit markets forms a clear divergence from this historical pattern.

Bond Market Bearing Pressure Alone, Divergence with Stocks Continues to Widen

While equity and credit markets show high immunity to geopolitical risks, sovereign bond markets have charted a distinctly different course.

Over the past month, the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note has almost completely tracked oil price movements, clearly decoupling from other asset classes. In mid-May, sovereign bond yields hit multi-year highs: the 30-year US Treasury yield rose to 5.18%, the highest since 2007; the 10-year German bund yield climbed to 3.19%, the highest since 2011.

At that time, stocks were just a step away from record highs, while bond yields were already at levels not seen in over a decade. This divergence shows no signs of convergence to this day.

Henry Allen believes that bond markets more directly price in inflation and fiscal risks, hence reacting more sensitively to geopolitical shocks. The persistent divergence between stock and bond markets is itself a manifestation of current market fragility.

Unexpectedly Stable Oil Prices: A Key Pillar for Risk Assets

The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has lasted far longer than initial market expectations, yet the reaction in oil prices has been surprisingly mild, which partly explains the resilience of risk assets.

When the US-Iran conflict erupted on February 28, the White House initially estimated the operation would last 4 to 6 weeks. However, the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked to this day. According to prediction market Polymarket data, the probability of normal navigation resuming by the end of June has plummeted from around 80% in mid-April to just 22%.

Despite this, the oil futures curve has remained relatively stable. Just two weeks after the conflict began, on March 13, the 6-month Brent crude futures contract settled at $85.66 per barrel. On June 1, the same contract was quoted around $84.88, barely moving.

Henry Allen points out that it is precisely because the oil futures curve has not shifted significantly higher that investors have not priced in serious stagflation risks, thereby avoiding larger-scale selling of risk assets. However, he warns that if the Strait of Hormuz blockade persists, whether this support can be maintained remains uncertain.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, how many times since WWII has the S&P 500 gained 16% in a two-month period, and what is the key characteristic of the only non-recessionary precedent?

AAccording to the article, the S&P 500 has gained 16% in a two-month period only 4 times since WWII. Three of these instances occurred during recoveries from recessions. The only non-recessionary precedent was in January-February 1987, which preceded the 'Black Monday' crash later that year.

QWhat consumer-related warning signs are mentioned in the article as potential risks being overlooked by the market?

AThe article mentions two key consumer-related warning signs: the U.S. savings rate was only 2.6% in April (a level historically only seen briefly in 2022 and before the global financial crisis), and the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index hit its lowest recorded level since 1952 in May.

QWhat historical anomaly does the article point out regarding the current relationship between Federal Reserve policy expectations and credit spreads?

AThe article points out a historical anomaly where tightening Federal Reserve policy has typically coincided with widening credit spreads, as seen in 2022, late 2018, and 2015-2016. However, currently, despite rising expectations for Fed rate hikes, credit spreads remain at historically low levels, showing a clear divergence from this past pattern.

QHow has the sovereign bond market behaved differently from the stock and credit markets in response to recent geopolitical risks?

AWhile stock and credit markets have shown resilience, the sovereign bond market has been under significant pressure. Specifically, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has closely followed oil price movements, decoupling from other assets. Yields on long-term U.S. and German government bonds recently hit multi-year highs, indicating the bond market is more directly pricing in inflation and fiscal risks.

QWhy has the oil market's reaction to the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz been described as a 'key pillar' for risk assets?

AThe oil market's reaction has been a 'key pillar' for risk assets because, despite the Strait of Hormuz closure lasting much longer than initially expected, oil futures prices have remained surprisingly stable. This lack of a sharp upward move in the oil futures curve has prevented investors from pricing in severe stagflation risks, thereby avoiding a larger sell-off in riskier assets like stocks.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报31 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报31 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News49 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News49 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare 4

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di 4 (4) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente 44.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva 4 (4)Dopo aver acquistato 4 (4), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia 4 (4)Scambia facilmente 4 (4) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

390 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.10.20Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare 4

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di 4 4 sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片