US Stocks Surge 16% in Two Months: Only 4 Occurrences in History, the Most Recent Was Just Before the 1987 Crash

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-03

Introduzione

U.S. stocks have surged 16% over April and May, a gain seen only four times since WWII, according to Deutsche Bank strategist Henry Allen. Three prior instances followed recessions, but the sole non-recession precedent was in early 1987, months before the "Black Monday" crash. The current rally is underpinned by AI enthusiasm and strong data, but its speed without an economic recovery is historically unprecedented. Meanwhile, credit spreads remain near record lows despite growing consumer strain—the U.S. savings rate hit just 2.6% in April, a level last seen before the Global Financial Crisis, and consumer sentiment is at its lowest since 1952. Market risks are concentrated. While stocks and credit markets appear immune to geopolitical tensions, sovereign bonds tell a different story. Treasury yields have tracked oil prices and recently hit multi-year highs, creating a widening divergence with equities. Surprisingly stable oil prices, despite the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, have been a key pillar for risk assets. However, if the blockage persists, this support could fade, raising the risk of a stagflation shock not currently priced in.

Original Author: Zhao Ying

Original Source: Wall Street News

The recent strong rally in U.S. stocks is triggering historical alarms. The S&P 500 index has accumulated a 16% gain from April to May, a magnitude of increase that has occurred only 4 times since World War II. Three of those instances happened during recovery phases following economic recessions. The sole precedent not in a post-recession context occurred just months before the "Black Monday" crash in 1987.

Deutsche Bank macro strategist Henry Allen points out that the current rally is not taking place against a backdrop of post-recession recovery, making the historical comparison particularly stark. Meanwhile, credit spreads remain at historically low levels, but pressure signals from the consumer side are accumulating, expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate hikes are heating up, and the divergence between sovereign bond markets and stock markets continues to widen.

With multiple risk factors converging, market tail risks are becoming exceptionally concentrated. Henry Allen wrote in the report, "The tail risks in the current distribution are exceptionally prominent, both at the geopolitical level and at the market level."

Historical Precedents Are Rare, Only One Non-Recession Example Exists

The S&P 500's two-month gain of 16% from April to May has only 4 precedents since WWII.

Three of them occurred during powerful rebounds following recessions: the post-COVID-19 recovery from April to May 2020, the post-global financial crisis rebound from March to April 2009, and the recovery rally following the first oil crisis from January to February 1975.

The 4th instance was from January to February 1987. That was just months before October's "Black Monday" — the day the S&P 500 plunged 20% in a single session.

Henry Allen emphasizes that the current rally has its fundamental support, including high enthusiasm for artificial intelligence and strong economic data, but "the pace of gains itself has broken all recent precedents." In an economy not emerging from a recession, a rebound of this speed has never ended well in history.

Furthermore, the S&P 500 is on track to achieve its fourth consecutive year of double-digit gains, a record not seen since the late 1990s.

Excessive Optimism in Credit Markets, Consumer Pressure Signals Overlooked

The strength in equities has also spread to credit markets. Credit spreads in both the US and Europe are currently narrower than before the US-Iran conflict erupted, showing the market's high tolerance for risk.

However, warning signals at the consumer level are accumulating. The US savings rate was just 2.6% in April, a similarly low level historically seen in only two other periods: a single month in 2022 (when pandemic-era excess savings were being depleted) and just before the global financial crisis erupted. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index hit its all-time low in May since records began in 1952.

The monetary policy environment is also tightening. The European Central Bank is widely expected to raise interest rates this month, and market bets on Federal Reserve rate hikes in 2026 are heating up — with US PCE inflation reaching 3.8% year-on-year in April, providing support for this expectation.

Henry Allen notes that historically, hawkish stances from the Federal Reserve have often coincided with widening credit spreads, as seen in 2022, late 2018, and from 2015 to 2016. The current calm in credit markets forms a clear divergence from this historical pattern.

Bond Market Bearing Pressure Alone, Divergence with Stocks Continues to Widen

While equity and credit markets show high immunity to geopolitical risks, sovereign bond markets have charted a distinctly different course.

Over the past month, the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note has almost completely tracked oil price movements, clearly decoupling from other asset classes. In mid-May, sovereign bond yields hit multi-year highs: the 30-year US Treasury yield rose to 5.18%, the highest since 2007; the 10-year German bund yield climbed to 3.19%, the highest since 2011.

At that time, stocks were just a step away from record highs, while bond yields were already at levels not seen in over a decade. This divergence shows no signs of convergence to this day.

Henry Allen believes that bond markets more directly price in inflation and fiscal risks, hence reacting more sensitively to geopolitical shocks. The persistent divergence between stock and bond markets is itself a manifestation of current market fragility.

Unexpectedly Stable Oil Prices: A Key Pillar for Risk Assets

The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has lasted far longer than initial market expectations, yet the reaction in oil prices has been surprisingly mild, which partly explains the resilience of risk assets.

When the US-Iran conflict erupted on February 28, the White House initially estimated the operation would last 4 to 6 weeks. However, the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked to this day. According to prediction market Polymarket data, the probability of normal navigation resuming by the end of June has plummeted from around 80% in mid-April to just 22%.

Despite this, the oil futures curve has remained relatively stable. Just two weeks after the conflict began, on March 13, the 6-month Brent crude futures contract settled at $85.66 per barrel. On June 1, the same contract was quoted around $84.88, barely moving.

Henry Allen points out that it is precisely because the oil futures curve has not shifted significantly higher that investors have not priced in serious stagflation risks, thereby avoiding larger-scale selling of risk assets. However, he warns that if the Strait of Hormuz blockade persists, whether this support can be maintained remains uncertain.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, how many times since WWII has the S&P 500 gained 16% in a two-month period, and what is the key characteristic of the only non-recessionary precedent?

AAccording to the article, the S&P 500 has gained 16% in a two-month period only 4 times since WWII. Three of these instances occurred during recoveries from recessions. The only non-recessionary precedent was in January-February 1987, which preceded the 'Black Monday' crash later that year.

QWhat consumer-related warning signs are mentioned in the article as potential risks being overlooked by the market?

AThe article mentions two key consumer-related warning signs: the U.S. savings rate was only 2.6% in April (a level historically only seen briefly in 2022 and before the global financial crisis), and the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index hit its lowest recorded level since 1952 in May.

QWhat historical anomaly does the article point out regarding the current relationship between Federal Reserve policy expectations and credit spreads?

AThe article points out a historical anomaly where tightening Federal Reserve policy has typically coincided with widening credit spreads, as seen in 2022, late 2018, and 2015-2016. However, currently, despite rising expectations for Fed rate hikes, credit spreads remain at historically low levels, showing a clear divergence from this past pattern.

QHow has the sovereign bond market behaved differently from the stock and credit markets in response to recent geopolitical risks?

AWhile stock and credit markets have shown resilience, the sovereign bond market has been under significant pressure. Specifically, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has closely followed oil price movements, decoupling from other assets. Yields on long-term U.S. and German government bonds recently hit multi-year highs, indicating the bond market is more directly pricing in inflation and fiscal risks.

QWhy has the oil market's reaction to the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz been described as a 'key pillar' for risk assets?

AThe oil market's reaction has been a 'key pillar' for risk assets because, despite the Strait of Hormuz closure lasting much longer than initially expected, oil futures prices have remained surprisingly stable. This lack of a sharp upward move in the oil futures curve has prevented investors from pricing in severe stagflation risks, thereby avoiding a larger sell-off in riskier assets like stocks.

Letture associate

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbit11 min fa

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbit11 min fa

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders In recent years, prediction markets have grown from a niche sector to a mainstream arena, attracting billions in trading volume and institutional capital. However, the user experience and tools for traders have not kept pace. Outpoll, a new global prediction market platform, aims to fill this gap by providing enhanced trading infrastructure for active and professional traders. Built on standard prediction market principles, Outpoll allows users to trade on the outcome of specific events. It uses fully collateralized contracts with USDC settlement, charges a competitive 0.1% fee per trade, and provides clear settlement rules upfront to minimize disputes. A key focus for Outpoll is its professional-grade trading tools. The platform supports limit and market orders, as well as take-profit and stop-loss orders for open positions—features uncommon in prediction markets. For automated trading, Outpoll offers comprehensive REST and WebSocket APIs, enabling portfolio management, price arbitrage, and integration with existing tools. The platform also features a creator-led market model, where approved experts and community leaders can create and manage markets for niche topics under platform supervision. Its integrated interface combines news feeds directly with trading functions, allowing users to monitor events and manage positions seamlessly. Outpoll launched with a native Android app (available on Google Play) and plans an iOS version later this year. In summary, Outpoll distinguishes itself with trader-focused tools, practical APIs, transparent and collateralized markets, integrated news, and an expanding creator program. For active traders, its advanced order types and API access alone make it a platform worth watching. Outpoll is now globally accessible via outpoll.com and Google Play.

marsbit19 min fa

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

marsbit19 min fa

Bitwise: Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Investment, Three Logics to Understand the Current Market

**Summary** Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, analyzes the current crypto market through three key lenses, arguing it has shifted from a momentum-driven to a contrarian investment. **1) Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Play:** The market is weak, with major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum down significantly. Capital has moved to hot sectors like AI, leaving crypto as an "unloved" asset class. This transforms crypto investing from trend-following to a test of patience and fundamental analysis. Investors now favor projects with solid fundamentals (e.g., Hyperliquid) over speculative ones. **2) Regulatory Overhang:** The uncertain fate of the U.S. CLARITY Act, a major crypto regulatory framework, is a key headwind. With its passage in 2024 seen as far from guaranteed (estimates range from 30-55%), institutional capital remains on the sidelines, choosing less risky alternatives like AI stocks. The market needs clarity—whether the bill passes or fails—more than any specific outcome to move decisively. **3) Capital Rotates to New Fundamentals:** This cycle differs from past bear markets where money fled to Bitcoin. Now, capital seeks smaller assets with strong use cases. While major cryptos fell in May 2024, tokens like Hyperliquid (+72%), Zcash (+50%), and XLM (+44%) rallied on their specific fundamentals. This rotation confirms the new contrarian, fundamentals-driven logic and signals the bear market may be in its later stages. **Conclusion:** Short-term pressure persists due to regulatory uncertainty and competition from AI narratives. Investing in crypto now requires a contrarian mindset—acting against the crowd and focusing on fundamental value. Patience and targeting high-quality projects based on their merits are essential for capturing long-term gains.

marsbit1 h fa

Bitwise: Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Investment, Three Logics to Understand the Current Market

marsbit1 h fa

ChatGPT Might Be Disappearing Soon

OpenAI announced at its "Intelligence at Work" event that its coding assistant, Codex, will be fully integrated into the ChatGPT app within weeks. This move marks a strategic shift from a conversational AI (Chat) towards a unified "agentic" platform capable of execution. Codex, originally launched to compete with Anthropic's Claude Code, has grown rapidly to 5 million weekly active users, with 20% being non-developers like analysts and designers. Its enterprise revenue now constitutes 40% of OpenAI's total. The integration is the first step in creating a super-app combining ChatGPT (interface), Codex (execution engine), and the Atlas browser (web access). OpenAI also unveiled new Codex features: specialized Agent plugins for six professional roles, an "Annotations" tool for direct document editing, and a "Sites" function to turn work into shareable web apps. Internally, this reflects a power shift; the Codex team now leads core product strategy. While the ChatGPT brand remains for its vast user base, the platform's future is focused on autonomous agents that perform tasks, not just chat. The article notes that competition with Claude Code pushed OpenAI's development, with Codex competing on cost-effectiveness and accessibility rather than raw coding quality. It concludes that the essence of "ChatGPT" is evolving from a chatbot into an AI agent platform, with the name potentially becoming a legacy symbol of its original function.

marsbit1 h fa

ChatGPT Might Be Disappearing Soon

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare 4

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di 4 (4) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente 44.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva 4 (4)Dopo aver acquistato 4 (4), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia 4 (4)Scambia facilmente 4 (4) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

351 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.10.20Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare 4

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di 4 4 sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片