US prosecutors request new trial for Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-10

Introduzione

U.S. prosecutors are seeking a retrial for Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm on charges of money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violations after a previous jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on those counts. Although Storm was convicted of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, the unresolved charges allow for a new trial. Prosecutors proposed a retrial as early as October, while Storm’s defense suggested availability no sooner than 2026. The case is closely watched in the crypto industry, as it could set a precedent for the legal liability of developers working on decentralized financial software and open-source protocols.

U.S. prosecutors are seeking a retrial for Roman Storm, the co-founder of the cryptocurrency mixing service Tornado Cash. This comes after a federal jury issued a mixed verdict in the previous trial. The case has received considerable attention in the cryptocurrency industry because it has the potential to set the stage for the legal accountability of decentralized software developers. Prosecutors in Manhattan are seeking a retrial for Roman Storm on two counts after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict in the previous trial.

The Letter For The Retrial

Jay Clayton wrote to Katherine Polk Failla on Monday and asked her to arrange for a retrial of Roman Storm on charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate sanctions. The government suggested the period between Oct. 5 and Oct. 12 for the trial, indicating that it could take around three weeks for the process to end. The letter indicated that the government was ready to retry the case as early as between March and May. However, Storm’s defense attorneys indicated to the prosecutors that they could only participate in the process as late as 2026.

During the earlier trial, the jurors found Storm guilty of conspiring to run an unlicensed money transmitting business in association with the crypto mixer known as Tornado Cash. However, the jury did not arrive at a unanimous decision regarding the money laundering charge and sanctions conspiracy charge, which means that these charges are eligible for retrial. Storm continues to stand by his plea of not guilty and had previously moved to dismiss the money transmitting charge. His legal representatives had argued that the prosecution failed to prove that he intended to help illicit actors use his platform. Clayton’s letter also stated that Storm’s legal representatives argued it was premature to seek a retrial until the court resolves the motion to dismiss, scheduled for argument in early April.

Tornado Cash is now a closely watched legal case in the cryptocurrency and decentralized finance spaces. This is because the outcome is thought to have implications for the interpretation of the liability of developers in decentralized software systems. It has been observed that the prosecutors used federal money transmitter laws as the basis for the prosecution of the developer of the Tornado Cash protocol. The jury has since convicted Storm of running an unlicensed money transmitting business.

Meanwhile, the jurors were unable to make a decision on the money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violation charges against Tornado Cash. These unresolved charges give the prosecution the option of holding a retrial for the unresolved charges against Tornado Cash. Legal experts say that a retrial could help determine the extent of liability for developers of open-source financial technologies. Other analysts have cautioned that expansive interpretations of current financial laws could confuse the development of decentralized finance products. Pro-privacy groups have highlighted Tornado Cash’s role as an open-source privacy protocol on blockchain networks.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Trump Signals Iran War May End Very Soon, Floats U.S. Control of the Strait of Hormuz

TagsBlockchainTornado CashU.S

Domande pertinenti

QWhat specific charges is the US government seeking a retrial for against Roman Storm?

AThe US government is seeking a retrial for Roman Storm on the charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate sanctions.

QWhy did the jury's previous verdict lead to the possibility of a retrial?

AThe jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on the money laundering and sanctions conspiracy charges, making those specific charges eligible for a retrial.

QWhat was the one charge that the jury did convict Roman Storm on in the initial trial?

AThe jury convicted Roman Storm of conspiring to run an unlicensed money transmitting business.

QWhy is the Tornado Cash case considered so significant for the cryptocurrency industry?

AThe case is significant because its outcome could set a legal precedent for determining the liability of developers who create decentralized software and open-source financial technologies.

QWhat argument did Storm's defense team use to challenge the money laundering charge?

AStorm's defense attorneys argued that the prosecution failed to prove he had the intent to help illicit actors use the Tornado Cash platform.

Letture associate

Luno cuts 20% of staff as crypto layoffs spread across 12 firms in July

Crypto exchange Luno is cutting 20% of its global workforce to restructure operations and focus more on institutional clients and B2B services. CEO James Lanigan cited investments in automation and operational improvements as changing the company's needs. This is Luno's second major round of layoffs, having cut 35% of staff in early 2023. The company, serving 16 million users, is part of a wider industry trend where crypto firms cite AI and automation for job cuts. In July alone, layoffs or restructuring affected 12 crypto and adjacent companies, impacting 894 jobs according to CryptoJobsList. The tracker has recorded over 7,254 disclosed job cuts across 47 companies in 2026, with market conditions being the most common reason. Other firms like Exodus and Gnosis have also recently announced staff reductions, highlighting the ongoing challenges in the crypto sector.

cointelegraph8 min fa

Luno cuts 20% of staff as crypto layoffs spread across 12 firms in July

cointelegraph8 min fa

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

AI Is Eliminating 'Entertainment for the Poor' This article discusses the rising cost of video gaming, arguing that AI is making digital entertainment increasingly expensive. It follows the example of a frugal gamer who, accustomed to waiting for discounts and buying second-hand games, now faces a new reality. Video game consoles like the PS5 Pro and Switch 2 are increasing in price post-launch, breaking the traditional pattern of降价 over time. Game prices are also rising, with major titles like GTA 6 launching at $80. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards eliminating physical media, exemplified by Sony's plan to stop PS disc production by 2028. This shift blocks the二手 market, a key cost-saving avenue for players. Even Valve's anticipated affordable Steam Machine launched with a high price and disappointing specs. Manufacturers cite inflation, supply chain issues, and rising development costs, but a core driver is the AI boom. AI data centers now consume semiconductor and memory resources once prioritized for consumer electronics like game consoles. This competition from a more profitable sector drives up hardware costs. Additionally, developing modern AAA games with massive teams over many years is astronomically expensive, pushing publishers towards digital-only distribution and subscription models to secure recurring revenue. The article suggests this trend extends beyond gaming. Video streaming, music platforms, cloud storage, and AI tools are increasingly locked behind complex subscription tiers. While AI promises future benefits, it is currently making digital entertainment and services more costly. The era of progressively cheaper, accessible online entertainment is ending, forcing consumers to pay more upfront for future technological promises.

marsbit13 min fa

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

marsbit13 min fa

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

South Korea's AI-driven bull market has taken a sharp downturn, severely impacting SK Hynix's stock and prompting regulatory tightening in both Hong Kong and South Korea on single-stock leveraged products. The CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) ETF, once the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF with over HKD 130 billion in assets, saw its value plummet by over 80% as SK Hynix shares fell nearly 46% from their June peak, erasing more than HKD 100 billion. In response, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) revised its regulatory framework. Starting August 3rd, fixed 2x leverage for single-stock leveraged and inverse products will shift to a dynamic "flexible leverage" mechanism, where daily leverage can vary up to a maximum of 2x. This aims to balance market development with investor protection but has sparked debate about changes to the products' core features and potential reduced appeal for risk-seeking investors. Simultaneously, South Korean authorities announced plans to further restrict single-stock leveraged ETFs following two consecutive days of market circuit breakers. Proposed measures include capping individual investors' allocations to such products at 20% of their total financial investment assets, increasing trading costs, and enhancing suitability requirements. The Finance Minister publicly apologized, acknowledging insufficient initial risk assessment. Analysts note that while the long-term fundamentals for South Korean semiconductor firms like SK Hynix remain solid, short-term market volatility is heightened due to concentrated leveraged bets and shifting global risk sentiment. The regulatory moves in both markets signal a clear shift from encouraging innovation towards prioritizing risk control, reminding investors of the amplified risks inherent in leveraged products.

marsbit18 min fa

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

marsbit18 min fa

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

"The Privatization of Human Civilization" The article critiques how AI companies like Anthropic are systematically acquiring and digitizing millions of books—sometimes by destroying physical copies—to build proprietary training datasets for models like Claude. While a lawsuit resulted in a settlement, the author argues the deeper issue transcends copyright: it is about the privatization and centralized control of human knowledge and civilization. This process coincides with a powerful Silicon Valley ideology, exemplified by Marc Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" and movements like e/acc (Effective Accelerationism). This worldview frames technological growth and speed as inherently moral, portraying caution, regulation, and public dissent as obstacles to progress. It often envisions intelligence itself, rather than human well-being, as the ultimate goal, potentially sidelining present human concerns. Figures like Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin express skepticism towards democratic processes as too slow, suggesting more centralized, founder-led governance is efficient. This logic extends to AI, where a small team within a company defines the model's "constitution"—its rules, values, and definitions of truth and safety—effectively governing how millions understand the world. Thus, the scanned books symbolize a new form of control. Knowledge isn't erased but is ingested into private, opaque systems. The original, decentralized, and contestable nature of books and public knowledge is replaced by a curated, company-controlled output. The public's access to their own cultural heritage becomes mediated by corporate AI, which remembers civilization only in the form its creators dictate. This is not book-burning but a subtler, potentially more complete privatization of human memory and understanding.

marsbit28 min fa

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

marsbit28 min fa

No Issuance, Only Tolls: Visa's Stablecoin Gambit Is More Ruthless Than Issuers

**Summary:** In its Q3 2026 earnings, Visa announced strong financial results but focused market attention on its strategic moves in the stablecoin space. Visa joined the Open Standard alliance supporting the new stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) and launched its Visa Stablecoin Platform (VSP). This platform provides partners with infrastructure for stablecoin settlement, custody, and conversion between fiat and stablecoins. Crucially, Visa emphasized a "multi-currency, multi-chain" strategy, stating its role is not to pick winners among stablecoin issuers. The analysis suggests Visa's approach is less about competing with established issuers like Tether and Circle, and more about positioning itself as the essential infrastructure layer. By building platforms that handle settlement, wallets, and conversions, Visa aims to profit from transaction fees regardless of which stablecoin gains dominance. The article notes skepticism around the OUSD alliance, with some listed members denying formal participation, viewing it more as a statement of intent than a committed bet. Visa's strategy appears to be a low-cost option: gaining influence in the stablecoin narrative while letting others compete at the issuance layer, ultimately banking on controlling the critical payment channels through which any successful stablecoin must flow.

marsbit43 min fa

No Issuance, Only Tolls: Visa's Stablecoin Gambit Is More Ruthless Than Issuers

marsbit43 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片