US Market Structure Bill Delayed and Deferred Again — Is a 2026 Passage Possible?

ccn.comPubblicato 2026-01-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-22

Introduzione

The US crypto market structure bill, which aims to provide regulatory clarity, has faced another delay in the Senate as of January 2026. Key factors include Coinbase withdrawing support, citing concerns over stablecoin yield bans and expanded SEC authority. Competing legislative priorities, partisan disagreements, and the upcoming midterm elections further complicate its passage. A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee may advance, but the overall timeline remains uncertain. While 2026 passage is still possible, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.

Key Takeaways

  • Senate consideration of the crypto market structure bill stalled again in January 2026 after Coinbase withdrew its support.
  • A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee could move forward soon, with a potential hearing as early as Jan. 27.
  • Passage in 2026 remains possible, but midterm elections and unresolved regulatory disputes make the outcome increasingly uncertain.

Crypto’s long-awaited path to regulatory clarity in the U.S. just hit another roadblock .

After months of negotiations, industry lobbying, and bipartisan signaling, momentum around Washington’s flagship crypto market structure bill is once again slowing.

Behind the scenes, shifting political priorities, growing industry pushback, and committee-level maneuvering are reshaping the bill’s timeline—raising fresh questions about whether 2026 will finally deliver the rules the crypto sector has been waiting for.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
88
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
BTCC<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

BTCC

promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
162
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

Another Delay?

The U.S. crypto market structure bill cleared the House in mid-2025, but momentum has repeatedly stalled in the Senate.

Lawmakers released an updated draft earlier this month and scheduled a new meeting for Jan. 27, raising hopes of progress after weeks of uncertainty.

Those hopes remain fragile. Industry pushback, partisan negotiations, and shifting legislative priorities have repeatedly delayed the bill.

As of January 2026, Senate markups have been postponed again, with consideration now likely pushed to late February or March.

Competing priorities—particularly housing affordability legislation tied to President Trump’s agenda—have taken precedence.

A floor vote may not occur until after the Jan. 30 deadline for a stopgap government funding bill, further complicating the timeline.

The bill also faces structural hurdles. It requires approval from multiple committees, and negotiations between Republicans and Democrats remain tense.

Republicans have pushed for lighter oversight under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while Democrats have emphasized stronger consumer protections.

Lawmakers such as Sen. Debbie Stabenow have raised concerns over provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities, and the draft has ballooned to more than 100 amendments—an indicator of how far consensus remains.

Reasons For Delay

Several factors have contributed to the latest setbacks.

Coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange, withdrew its support for the Senate draft on Jan. 15, 2026, citing “too many issues,” including proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority over crypto markets.

CEO Brian Armstrong called the draft “materially worse than the status quo.”

The move dealt a major blow to the bill, as Coinbase’s support was seen as critical to maintaining industry consensus.

With midterm elections approaching in November 2026, lawmakers are increasingly prioritizing voter-focused issues such as housing affordability.

Funding measures and other Trump-backed initiatives are taking precedence, potentially pushing crypto legislation further down the agenda.

Political polarization and the bill’s complexity have also fueled concerns that partisan point-scoring could derail progress.

A shift in Senate control during the midterms could further jeopardize the bill’s chances.

In the meantime, the SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential “exemptive relief” that could ease certain regulatory burdens without new legislation.

While this may reduce near-term pressure to pass the bill, it falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry has been seeking.

Overall, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance of passage in 2026, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority in the coming months.

2026 CLARITY Act Still Possible?

Despite the delays, passage in 2026 is still possible. If markups resume in late February and key disputes are resolved, the bill could advance.

However, the approaching November midterm elections add political risk, as shifting control of Congress could derail the effort entirely.

In the meantime, regulators may attempt to fill the gap.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins has signaled a significant easing of enforcement pressure through rulemaking and exemptive relief, offering some short-term breathing room for the industry even as comprehensive legislation remains stalled.

At its core, the market structure bill aims to clarify the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC, define when crypto tokens qualify as securities or commodities, and establish clearer rules around stablecoins, DeFi, and consumer protections.

Whether those goals can survive the current political logjam will shape the U.S. crypto landscape for years to come.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Domande pertinenti

QWhy was the US crypto market structure bill delayed again in January 2026?

AThe bill was delayed due to Coinbase withdrawing its support, shifting political priorities such as housing affordability legislation, partisan negotiations, and the complexity of the bill with over 100 amendments.

QWhat are the key differences between the Republican and Democratic positions on the crypto market structure bill?

ARepublicans push for lighter oversight under the CFTC, while Democrats emphasize stronger consumer protections and have raised concerns about provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities.

QWhat impact did Coinbase's withdrawal of support have on the bill?

ACoinbase's withdrawal dealt a major blow to the bill, as its support was critical for maintaining industry consensus, citing issues like proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority.

QIs passage of the crypto market structure bill still possible in 2026, and what are the chances?

APassage in 2026 is still possible with an estimated 50-60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority, but midterm elections add political risk.

QHow are regulators like the SEC and CFTC addressing crypto regulation in the absence of the bill?

AThe SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential 'exemptive relief' to ease certain regulatory burdens, though this falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry seeks.

Letture associate

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1 h fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2 h fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片