U.S. Government Shutdown Odds for Feb. 14 Spike, Crypto Markets React

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-13

Introduzione

The probability of a U.S. federal government shutdown by February 14, 2026, has been highly volatile, with prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi showing odds fluctuating between 29% and 97%. A shutdown could occur if funding for the Department of Homeland Security is not approved. This follows the longest U.S. shutdown in history from October to November 2025, which lasted 43 days. Crypto markets are reacting to the heightened fiscal uncertainty. Bitcoin, which traded near $125K during the previous shutdown, is now around $66K, down over 23% year-to-date. Ethereum and other altcoins have also weakened, with total crypto market cap dropping below $2.28 trillion. If a shutdown occurs, key economic data may be delayed, regulatory agencies could operate with reduced staff, and crypto markets might face increased volatility and further downward pressure, potentially testing Bitcoin's support near $60,000.

While the global crypto market faces selling pressure, the likelihood of a U.S. federal government shutdown by February 14, 2026, has been moving sharply in recent days as lawmakers work toward a funding agreement.

Early today, the prediction market Polymarket showed that the probability of a shutdown by midnight on February 14 briefly reached 97%. Later, that probability fell to around 29%, with the market seeing over $7 million in trading volume.

Similarly, Kalshi, another regulated prediction market, currently places the shutdown odds near 88% with $9,350,895 volume. Both sources indicate elevated but volatile expectations that the government might fail to secure funding in time.

A shutdown occurs when lawmakers fail to pass on appropriations bills by a set deadline, forcing a partial halt of non-essential federal services. If unresolved, this could occur later in 2026, echoing a similar impasse in late 2025 that lasted over 40 days.

Now, a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is set to expire on February 14. The vote was 52–47, short of the 60 votes needed to move forward with the legislation. As a result, because no replacement funding has been approved, a partial shutdown of DHS operations could occur once funding lapses at midnight on February 14.

The most recent U.S. government shutdown started on October 1, 2025, and lasted 43 days, ending on November 12, 2025, making it the longest in U.S. history. The shutdown occurred because lawmakers couldn’t agree on the federal budget, which caused thousands of government workers to be furloughed or work without pay.

Previous Shutdowns and Crypto Market Response

During the October–November 2025 shutdown, Bitcoin (BTC) traded near $125K but later slipped below the key psychological level of $100K. Since then, BTC has failed to regain momentum and is currently trading in the $66K range. It is down more than 23% year to date, erasing recent gains amid heightened fiscal uncertainty.

Other major cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum (ETH) and XRP, have similarly weakened. With Ethereum recently trading lower at $1.9K and altcoin markets showing greater drawdowns relative to Bitcoin.

Over the past 24 hours, the total cryptocurrency market capitalization has dropped from $2.32 trillion to below $2.28 trillion, reflecting lower buying interest amid broader risk aversion in global financial markets.

Market Outlook If Shutdown Occurs on February 14

If a government shutdown is formally announced by February 14, analysts expect several near‐term effects:

Economic data such as employment reports and inflation statistics may be delayed, removing key reference points for traders and potentially increasing short‐term price volatility in crypto markets.
Regulatory agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission would operate with reduced staff, delaying reviews of pending filings that could influence institutional participation in crypto markets.
Bitcoin and major altcoins may experience additional downward pressure as risk appetite weakens.

Based on current price levels, a shutdown occurring on the deadline could test support zones for Bitcoin near $60,000, while Ethereum may face additional selling pressure below $1.5K if risk‐off dynamics intensify. Wider crypto market conditions could become range-bound until funding clarity is established.

Top Updated Crypto News

Coinbase Reports Q4 Loss of $667 Million as it Expands Beyond Crypto Trading

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current probability of a U.S. government shutdown by February 14, 2026, according to prediction markets?

AAs per the article, Polymarket showed the probability briefly reaching 97% before falling to around 29%, while Kalshi currently places the odds near 88%.

QWhat was the duration and significance of the most recent U.S. government shutdown mentioned in the article?

AThe most recent shutdown started on October 1, 2025, and lasted 43 days, ending on November 12, 2025, making it the longest in U.S. history.

QHow did Bitcoin (BTC) perform during the previous government shutdown in late 2025?

ADuring the October-November 2025 shutdown, Bitcoin traded near $125K but later fell below the key psychological level of $100K and is currently trading around $66K, down more than 23% year to date.

QWhat are three potential effects on crypto markets if a government shutdown occurs on February 14th?

AAnalysts expect: 1) Delayed economic data increasing short-term volatility, 2) Reduced staff at regulatory agencies like the SEC delaying filings, and 3) Additional downward pressure on Bitcoin and altcoins as risk appetite weakens.

QWhich specific government department faces a funding deadline on February 14th, and what was the vote count on its funding bill?

AFunding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is set to expire. The vote was 52-47, short of the 60 votes needed to move the legislation forward.

Letture associate

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit14 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit14 min fa

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbit20 min fa

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbit20 min fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 h fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 h fa

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

"Vertical Integration Capital Aggregators: How Web3 Builds Unbreachable Moats" explores how leading Web3 protocols create competitive advantages by vertically integrating multiple ecosystem components. Unlike Web2 aggregators that focus on user demand or supplier commoditization, successful Web3 entities like Hyperliquid aggregate capital, liquidity, users, and distribution into a unified financial ecosystem. This integration allows for efficient capital deployment—Hyperliquid generates $0.30 in fees per $1 of TVL annually, compared to Aave's $0.05—while creating a defensible moat that is difficult to replicate across six simultaneous fronts. However, this model comes with risks: DeFi loses $0.50 to hacks for every $1 earned, pushing protocols toward partial centralization and closed systems for security and scalability. The token serves as a shared incentive layer, aligning stakeholders and driving value through mechanisms like buybacks. The article concludes that vertical integration, not capital itself, is the true moat, and that the industry is evolving toward pragmatic, partially centralized models to ensure economic growth and sustainability.

marsbit1 h fa

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

marsbit1 h fa

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

Summary: Angela Lipps, a woman from Tennessee, was wrongfully imprisoned for 160 days after a facial recognition AI incorrectly identified her as a suspect in a bank fraud case in North Dakota. Despite her insistence that she had never been to the state, she was arrested in July 2025 and held without bail. She spent 108 days in a local jail before being transferred to North Dakota in October, where she was eventually cleared after her lawyer provided bank records proving she was buying pizza in Tennessee at the time of the crime. Her ordeal highlights a growing issue with AI-driven law enforcement errors. Similar cases include Robert Williams, detained for 30 hours in 2020, and Chris Gatlin, jailed for 17 months based on flawed AI matches. Systems like Clearview AI, used by over 3,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies, often rely on low-quality images and can produce inaccurate results. Human oversight failures exacerbate the problem, as officers sometimes skip verification steps, leading to wrongful arrests. While AI has improved policing efficiency, its errors have serious consequences, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations and human accountability in its use.

marsbit2 h fa

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures