U.S. Government Shutdown Odds for Feb. 14 Spike, Crypto Markets React

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-13

Introduzione

The probability of a U.S. federal government shutdown by February 14, 2026, has been highly volatile, with prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi showing odds fluctuating between 29% and 97%. A shutdown could occur if funding for the Department of Homeland Security is not approved. This follows the longest U.S. shutdown in history from October to November 2025, which lasted 43 days. Crypto markets are reacting to the heightened fiscal uncertainty. Bitcoin, which traded near $125K during the previous shutdown, is now around $66K, down over 23% year-to-date. Ethereum and other altcoins have also weakened, with total crypto market cap dropping below $2.28 trillion. If a shutdown occurs, key economic data may be delayed, regulatory agencies could operate with reduced staff, and crypto markets might face increased volatility and further downward pressure, potentially testing Bitcoin's support near $60,000.

While the global crypto market faces selling pressure, the likelihood of a U.S. federal government shutdown by February 14, 2026, has been moving sharply in recent days as lawmakers work toward a funding agreement.

Early today, the prediction market Polymarket showed that the probability of a shutdown by midnight on February 14 briefly reached 97%. Later, that probability fell to around 29%, with the market seeing over $7 million in trading volume.

Similarly, Kalshi, another regulated prediction market, currently places the shutdown odds near 88% with $9,350,895 volume. Both sources indicate elevated but volatile expectations that the government might fail to secure funding in time.

A shutdown occurs when lawmakers fail to pass on appropriations bills by a set deadline, forcing a partial halt of non-essential federal services. If unresolved, this could occur later in 2026, echoing a similar impasse in late 2025 that lasted over 40 days.

Now, a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is set to expire on February 14. The vote was 52–47, short of the 60 votes needed to move forward with the legislation. As a result, because no replacement funding has been approved, a partial shutdown of DHS operations could occur once funding lapses at midnight on February 14.

The most recent U.S. government shutdown started on October 1, 2025, and lasted 43 days, ending on November 12, 2025, making it the longest in U.S. history. The shutdown occurred because lawmakers couldn’t agree on the federal budget, which caused thousands of government workers to be furloughed or work without pay.

Previous Shutdowns and Crypto Market Response

During the October–November 2025 shutdown, Bitcoin (BTC) traded near $125K but later slipped below the key psychological level of $100K. Since then, BTC has failed to regain momentum and is currently trading in the $66K range. It is down more than 23% year to date, erasing recent gains amid heightened fiscal uncertainty.

Other major cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum (ETH) and XRP, have similarly weakened. With Ethereum recently trading lower at $1.9K and altcoin markets showing greater drawdowns relative to Bitcoin.

Over the past 24 hours, the total cryptocurrency market capitalization has dropped from $2.32 trillion to below $2.28 trillion, reflecting lower buying interest amid broader risk aversion in global financial markets.

Market Outlook If Shutdown Occurs on February 14

If a government shutdown is formally announced by February 14, analysts expect several near‐term effects:

Economic data such as employment reports and inflation statistics may be delayed, removing key reference points for traders and potentially increasing short‐term price volatility in crypto markets.
Regulatory agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission would operate with reduced staff, delaying reviews of pending filings that could influence institutional participation in crypto markets.
Bitcoin and major altcoins may experience additional downward pressure as risk appetite weakens.

Based on current price levels, a shutdown occurring on the deadline could test support zones for Bitcoin near $60,000, while Ethereum may face additional selling pressure below $1.5K if risk‐off dynamics intensify. Wider crypto market conditions could become range-bound until funding clarity is established.

Top Updated Crypto News

Coinbase Reports Q4 Loss of $667 Million as it Expands Beyond Crypto Trading

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current probability of a U.S. government shutdown by February 14, 2026, according to prediction markets?

AAs per the article, Polymarket showed the probability briefly reaching 97% before falling to around 29%, while Kalshi currently places the odds near 88%.

QWhat was the duration and significance of the most recent U.S. government shutdown mentioned in the article?

AThe most recent shutdown started on October 1, 2025, and lasted 43 days, ending on November 12, 2025, making it the longest in U.S. history.

QHow did Bitcoin (BTC) perform during the previous government shutdown in late 2025?

ADuring the October-November 2025 shutdown, Bitcoin traded near $125K but later fell below the key psychological level of $100K and is currently trading around $66K, down more than 23% year to date.

QWhat are three potential effects on crypto markets if a government shutdown occurs on February 14th?

AAnalysts expect: 1) Delayed economic data increasing short-term volatility, 2) Reduced staff at regulatory agencies like the SEC delaying filings, and 3) Additional downward pressure on Bitcoin and altcoins as risk appetite weakens.

QWhich specific government department faces a funding deadline on February 14th, and what was the vote count on its funding bill?

AFunding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is set to expire. The vote was 52-47, short of the 60 votes needed to move the legislation forward.

Letture associate

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinist12 min fa

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinist12 min fa

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit36 min fa

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit47 min fa

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit47 min fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1 h fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1 h fa

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit1 h fa

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures