US Fed Moves to End ‘Reputation Risk’ Rule Amid Crypto Debanking Concerns

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-24

Introduzione

The US Federal Reserve is moving to codify a rule that would eliminate "reputation risk" as a factor in banking supervision, a practice blamed for widespread crypto debanking. Announced on February 23, the proposal seeks public feedback for two months. Fed Vice Chair Michelle Bowman stated that supervisors have been improperly pressuring banks to close accounts based on customers' political views, religious beliefs, or involvement in lawful but disfavored businesses like crypto, calling such discrimination unlawful. Senator Lummis and industry figures praised the move, viewing it as ending "Operation Chokepoint 2.0," a term describing alleged government efforts to cut off crypto firms from banking services.

The US Federal Reserve is looking for codifying a rule eliminating “reputation risk” from banking supervision, which some have condemned for a wave of crypto debanking in the past few years.

In the beginning, the Fed started making changes in June 2025 and publicised that it had directed its supervisors to stop pressuring banks to close client accounts over reputation risk, stating banks can only make decisions on clients based on financial risk management.

On February 23, the Fed announced through a press release that it is asking for feedback on a proposal to turn this into law. The Fed has given a two-month deadline for submitting comments.

Michelle Bowman, the vice chair for supervision, mentioned that we have heard troubling cases of debanking, where supervisors use concerns regarding reputation risk to pressure financial institutions to debank customers due to their political views, religious beliefs, or participation in disfavoured but lawful businesses.

She further went on, adding that discrimination via financial institutions on these bases is unlawful and doesn’t have a role in the Federal Reserve’s supervisory substructure. The same day, Lummis posted on X praising the move and added that it is not the Fed’s role to play both judge and jury for banking digital asset firms.

She wrote, “Happy to see this significant step to permanently eliminate ‘reputation risk’ from Fed policy and put Operation Chokepoint 2.0 to rest so America can be the digital asset capital of the world.”

Alex Thorn, the head of firmwide research of Galaxy Digital, also applauded the move, mentioning via X on Feb 23 that “chokepoint 2.0 rollback carries on.”

The term ‘Operation Chokepoint 2.0’ is used by a lot of members from the crypto industry to describe what they felt was a coordinated effort by the Joe Biden-guided US government and banking sector to prevent crypto companies from leveraging traditional banking services.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto.com Secures Conditional OCC Approval to Launch National Trust Bank

TagsCryptoFEDUSA

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the US Federal Reserve proposing to eliminate from banking supervision?

AThe US Federal Reserve is proposing to eliminate 'reputation risk' from banking supervision.

QWhy has the 'reputation risk' rule been criticized in recent years?

AIt has been criticized for causing a wave of crypto debanking, where banks close accounts based on perceived reputation risk rather than financial risk.

QWhat did Vice Chair Michelle Bowman say about debanking practices?

AShe stated that supervisors have pressured financial institutions to debank customers due to political views, religious beliefs, or participation in disfavored but lawful businesses, calling such discrimination unlawful.

QWhat is 'Operation Chokepoint 2.0' as referred to by the crypto industry?

AIt is a term used by the crypto industry to describe a perceived coordinated effort by the US government and banking sector to prevent crypto companies from accessing traditional banking services.

QHow did Senator Lummis and Galaxy Digital's Alex Thorn react to the Fed's proposal?

ABoth praised the move, with Lummis calling it a step to make America the digital asset capital of the world, and Thorn noting the 'chokepoint 2.0 rollback' continues.

Letture associate

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit28 min fa

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit28 min fa

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1 h fa

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1 h fa

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片