U.S. courts deliver sentencing in SafeMoon case as SBF pushes for new trial

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

Two major U.S. crypto fraud cases advanced differently on February 10. John Karony, former CEO of SafeMoon, was sentenced to 100 months in prison after victims testified about financial losses caused by his fraudulent assurances. The judge rejected defense arguments and described the scheme as "a massive fraud." Separately, Sam Bankman-Fried filed a pro se motion for a new trial, arguing new witness testimony could weaken the case against him. He was previously convicted and sentenced to 25 years for misusing FTX customer funds. These developments show how crypto cases are diverging—some reaching final sentencing, while others continue through prolonged appeals.

Two of the most prominent crypto fraud cases in the U.S. courts moved in different directions today, 10 February.

In one case, the former chief executive of SafeMoon received a prison sentence following conviction. In another, Sam Bankman-Fried, the former head of collapsed exchange FTX, filed a fresh bid seeking to reopen his case.

SafeMoon CEO sentenced after victim testimony

A federal judge in New York sentenced John Karony, the former CEO of SafeMoon, to 100 months in prison, according to courtroom reporting by Inner City Press.

During the sentencing hearing, multiple victims described how they invested in SafeMoon after being reassured by Karony’s public statements and personal engagement with the community.

Several said the losses reshaped their financial futures, preventing home purchases and affecting education plans.

U.S. prosecutors sought a 12-year sentence, arguing Karony deliberately misled investors and showed no remorse. The defense cited his age and background to mitigate the punishment.

The judge rejected those arguments, describing the scheme as “a massive fraud” and stating it was “more like theft than fraud,” emphasizing that investors had been explicitly assured there would be no rug pull.

The sentence marks a final chapter in one of the most widely followed cases to reach U.S. courts.

SBF files long-shot motion for new trial

In a separate development, Bankman-Fried filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial on his FTX fraud conviction, according to Bloomberg.

The filing, dated 5 February and docketed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, argues that new witness testimony could undermine the government’s case.

The request is separate from Bankman-Fried’s formal appeal. It comes after a federal appeals court rejected his attempt to secure release while that appeal is pending.

The Second Circuit ruled in December that he had not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success.

Bankman-Fried was convicted in November 2023 on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy and sentenced in March 2024 to 25 years in prison.

Prosecutors said he misappropriated billions of dollars in FTX customer funds to support risky trading at Alameda Research, political donations, and luxury real estate purchases.

Cases enter different phases

Together, the two developments highlight how high-profile crypto prosecutions are diverging in 2026.

While the SafeMoon case has reached sentencing, delivering closure for victims, the FTX case continues to generate procedural filings as its former executive pursues post-conviction relief.

Final Thoughts

The SafeMoon sentencing reflects courts moving toward final judgments in retail-focused crypto fraud cases.
Bankman-Fried’s filing underscores how larger cases can remain active for years through appeals and post-conviction motions.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the prison sentence given to the former CEO of SafeMoon, John Karony?

AJohn Karony, the former CEO of SafeMoon, was sentenced to 100 months in prison.

QWhat did Sam Bankman-Fried file in relation to his FTX fraud conviction?

ASam Bankman-Fried filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial on his FTX fraud conviction.

QWhat was the original sentence that U.S. prosecutors sought for John Karony?

AU.S. prosecutors sought a 12-year sentence for John Karony.

QHow many years in prison was Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to in March 2024?

ASam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024.

QAccording to the article, what did the judge describe the SafeMoon scheme as?

AThe judge described the SafeMoon scheme as 'a massive fraud' and stated it was 'more like theft than fraud'.

Letture associate

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit41 min fa

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit41 min fa

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit43 min fa

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit43 min fa

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report has intensified the ongoing bull-bear battle over the AI infrastructure stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and the firm's remaining performance obligation (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss more than doubled to $740M. The critical point of contention is profitability: while adjusted EBITDA margin was a robust 56%, the adjusted operating margin collapsed to just 1% due to soaring infrastructure and sales costs. A weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance further triggered an 11.4% single-day stock drop. The bull thesis hinges on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA (as a customer, investor, and key supplier), and a diversified client base now including Anthropic and Meta. The bear case focuses on the "scale at all costs" model, where expanding revenue leads to wider losses, ballooning debt ($25B), and massive capital expenditures ($6.8B in Q1). Insider selling by executives contrasts with a notable new investor: Chinese investor Duan Yongping initiated a small position (0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows. The coming Q2 report is seen as a key test for management's promise of a profit margin recovery.

marsbit49 min fa

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

marsbit49 min fa

China's Version of 'Tech Burning Man' Debuts in Shanghai, muShanghai Creates a Global Geek 'Pop-up City'

From May 10 to June 6, 2026, the inaugural muShanghai "Pop-up City" experiment, dubbed China's version of a "tech Burning Man," launched in Shanghai. Co-organized by the international open-source community The Mu and the Hongqiao Alibaba Center, this 28-day event aimed to build a global "parallel city" for geeks, attracting over 800 participants from more than 50 countries, including former OpenAI engineers and startup founders. The program featured four themed weeks: AI Week, Biotech Week, Robotics Week, and Culture Week, hosting nearly 100 sessions like ClawCon 2026. Activities ranged from discussions on AI safety and consumer apps to robot battles and cyberpunk culture, culminating in large outdoor "Innovator Marketplaces." A core principle was "Build in Public," encouraging open sharing of projects and progress. Hongqiao Alibaba Center served as the co-host and primary venue, positioning itself as a first-stop hub for international talent in China. The event marks a significant step for The Mu community, which has previously organized similar pop-up cities in Argentina and San Francisco, in bringing its model of immersive, collaborative innovation to China. It aims to be a key window for global科创 (scientific and technological innovation) exchange.

marsbit49 min fa

China's Version of 'Tech Burning Man' Debuts in Shanghai, muShanghai Creates a Global Geek 'Pop-up City'

marsbit49 min fa

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinist14 h fa

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinist14 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures