U.S. Banks Push Congress to Restrict Stablecoins and Crypto Data Access

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-22

Introduzione

U.S. banks, led by the American Bankers Association (ABA), are urging Congress to impose restrictions on stablecoins and financial data access. They advocate for a ban on yield-bearing stablecoins, warning that such products could draw trillillions of dollars from bank deposits, reducing lending capacity and creating financial stability risks. Additionally, banks seek changes to Section 1033 banking rules to impose stronger liability rules and potential fees on data sharing, which currently allows users to connect bank accounts to crypto platforms. Crypto and fintech groups argue these efforts are anti-competitive, designed to protect banks from innovation, and could effectively kill open banking by blocking connections or charging fees. This dispute has delayed a key crypto market structure bill in the U.S. Senate.

The traditional banks in the U.S. are pushing the lawmakers to change the crypto rules that would limit the stablecoins and financial data sharing. This push was led by the American Bankers Association (ABA), which is the major group of U.S. banks.

Why Banks Want Stablecoin Yields Banned

ABA’s are demanding a ban on the stablecoin yield. They say that the yield-bearing stablecoins could pull money out of the banks’ deposits and reduce the banks’ ability to lend, which creates financial stability risks. Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, warns that “trillions of money” will move from banks into stablecoins if the yield is allowed.

In reply, Crypto and Fintech groups argue that this would protect banks from the competition and make the stablecoins less useful and lock innovations behind the bank-controlled products.

ABA is also pushing to change the banking rules of Section 1033, which allows users have the right to share their financial data with the apps they choose. Right now, under the existing rules, users can connect their bank accounts to crypto wallets, exchanges, stablecoin apps, and fintech tools. But Banks are opposing the current rules and need the stronger liability rules and potential fees or restrictions on data sharing.

Crypto and fintech groups warn that the banks could use these crypto rule changes in their favor by charging fees for the data access, block connections, and slowly kill the open banking without banning it right away.

Stablecoin Yield Dispute Delays Key U.S. Crypto Bill

These disagreements and debate slows the progress on a major crypto market structure bill in the U.S. Senate, which involves who regulates crypto, how the stablecoin works, and how crypto fits into traditional finance. The current debate on stablecoin yield and financial stability sharing has caused a delay in voting from the Senate Banking Committee, and the coinbase has withdrawn its support for the bill.

Overall, banks want to grow crypto under the banking system, but crypto firms prefer decentralization on digital assets, user access, and financial data.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Analyst Underlines Possible ETH Price High After Revised Monthly Projection

TagsbanksCryptoStablecoin

Letture associate

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片