Unveiling the 'White-haired Stock God' Serenity: A Spiritual Remedy for Anxious Retail Investors

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-06-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-11

Introduzione

The article details the rise of Serenity, dubbed the "White-Haired Stock God," whose social media posts have recently caused significant volatility in China's A-share market. Previously gaining fame in international retail investor communities, Serenity is known for his "Chokepoint Investment" strategy targeting small monopolies in the AI supply chain, reportedly achieving returns over 3612% this year. His influence stems from his background as a former AI research scientist, detailed analysis, and a massive following on X, where his subscriber count has surpassed Elon Musk's. In early June, Serenity's Chinese-language posts mentioning A-shares like LeaderDrive (Lide Xiebo), Easun, and Innolight triggered immediate 20% surges in their stock prices. He later clarified that some recommendations were crowdsourced from followers and claimed he did not hold positions in these stocks, stating his actions were "just for fun" to offer a foreign perspective on Chinese markets. This activity drew scrutiny from Chinese financial media, which warned of potential "pump-and-dump" schemes and legal risks. While anonymous, clues suggest Serenity is likely a Chinese-speaking individual living in Japan. He maintains his anonymity due to past harassment but enjoys substantial monthly income from his paid subscriptions. The article posits that Serenity embodies the market's current appetite for a charismatic, successful figure during the AI bull run, serving as an "outward projection" of bulli...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Golem(@web 3_golem)

In the A-share market, the 'White-haired Stock God' Serenity has completely exploded in popularity.

From June 5th to June 9th, Serenity successively "called" three A-shares on the X platform: LeaderDrive, a concept stock for embodied intelligent robots, Easy Sight, a concept stock for digital intelligence new energy, and Innolight, a leading stock in the optical module sector. The stock prices of the first two were straight-line pulled to a 20cm limit-up on the same day, and LeaderDrive's June gain has already exceeded 30%.

The reason Serenity has such strong "call-signaling ability" is that before entering the sight of domestic A-share investors, he had already gained extremely high recognition in international retail investor communities.

Serenity's investment characteristic is to screen out small monopolistic enterprises on the AI industry chain that are not fully priced according to the "Chokepoint Investment Method." Because the over 16 stocks he called this year have all achieved investment returns exceeding 100%, with his personal year-to-date investment return exceeding 3612%, combined with his professional background as a former AI research scientist and his rigorous analysis of the AI industry and favored companies each time, Serenity has amassed a large number of loyal retail fans in Europe, America, Japan, and South Korea. His X account subscriber count surpasses that of Elon Musk, ranking first on the platform. Therefore, his influence on a stock's price fluctuations also exceeds that of ordinary stock analysts.

For example, on May 27th, Serenity posted on the X platform announcing that he had completed building a position in XFAB on the European stock market at a market cap of $1.28 billion. XFAB's stock price was subsequently pushed higher, with an intraday peak increase of 77%, reaching a high of 13.13 euros. After that, XFAB's stock price began a continuous decline, currently reporting around 8.8 euros, having returned to the level before Serenity's call.

The day after causing significant volatility in XFAB's stock price, Serenity posted on the X platform in Chinese, saying, "Because I see so much support from the Chinese community... maybe for fun, I'll start writing about my views on two Chinese stocks."

A storm sweeping through the A-share market thus began.

Disrupting the A-Share Market Without Holding Positions, Just for Fun?

In hindsight, the two stocks Serenity mentioned were LeaderDrive and Easy Sight.

On June 5th, Serenity posted in Chinese, specifically emphasizing "written especially for my Chinese readers," stating that LeaderDrive (688017, 57.73 billion RMB) was his most favored listed Chinese target while deploying in the humanoid robot sector. The main reason is its absolute dominance in certain robot component supply chains, with over 60% domestic market share and more than 1,800 global customers.

As of now, this post has been viewed over 4 million times and has been disseminated secondarily to multiple domestic social media platforms. LeaderDrive's stock price triggered a 20% limit-up on June 5th. By June 10th, in just 4 trading days, the stock price had risen over 30%.

On June 8th, the same market script played out again. Serenity posted a crowdsourced list of over 30 companies related to the "800V DC" concept on the X platform, which included the A-share company Easy Sight. The news quickly fermented domestically, and Easy Sight's stock price happily received a 20CM limit-up within an hour. By June 10th, its gain also exceeded 30%.

Even Serenity himself was surprised, posting in wonder, "Does everyone know this is just a crowdsourced list, right? How did 300376 (Easy Sight) rise 20%?"

He immediately followed up with another post stating, "These are stocks recommended by fans, not my personal recommendations," attempting to distance himself from it.

Besides these two stocks, Serenity also mentioned a third A-share, Innolight, on June 9th, stating that Innolight was the only Chinese listed company he invested in last year. However, because some AI mistranslated "Innolight" as another A-share listed company, Inno Laser, Inno Laser was violently pulled up nearly 10% in 10 minutes. This "mistaken identity" incident also reveals retail investors' FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) towards Serenity himself, "blindly asking what to buy, afraid of missing out on the hot stuff."

Serenity's actions quickly drew the attention of domestic financial media and securities analysts, who began speculating about his purpose for "cross-border stock promotion." On June 9th, Cailian Press published a long article reminding domestic investors to be vigilant about overseas information backflow. If Serenity's sharing involves profit-sharing, then the behavior is classic "export-for-domestic-sale-style cross-border stock promotion," which carries legal liabilities. Some domestic securities analysts even angrily posted on their social media circles, "These bastards will get their comeuppance sooner or later, thinking they can act lawlessly just by running abroad."

Facing domestic media's questioning about him "harvesting retail investors," Serenity responded that calling A-shares was just because he believed "foreigners could bring a different perspective to A-shares." He further stated, "Although I really like LeaderDrive, I don't hold its stock." Perhaps, as he initially said, the original intention for doing all this was just for fun.

Serenity appears like a "philanthropist." He emphasizes that he does not do any paid promotions or marketing. The only paid thing is a $1 monthly subscription service. He is not a member of any institution or the Illuminati. The reason for his continuous free sharing is his belief that the stock market is a positive-sum game process. He hopes retail investors can buy quality stocks without joining any expensive paid communities, even before institutions enter. He claims he is promoting information democratization.

In the investment field, don't overly deify anyone. Serenity may not seek profit, but he certainly seeks fame. Since starting to call A-shares on June 5th, Serenity's follower count has surged by over 200,000 again. As of June 11th, his X platform follower count exceeds 810,000, and account subscribers have grown to 54,000, leaving Musk (46,000) behind. With such a large subscriber base, even at a price of $1, Serenity's monthly fixed income reaches $54,000, easily earning millions of RMB annually.

Serenity's pinned posts are all celebrating his account subscriber count surpassing Musk, calling it his goal. An anonymous account having such high influence and attention makes investors even more curious about his real identity. Behind this account, is it an individual, a team, or even just an AI?

Very Likely a Chinese Person Residing in Japan?

Serenity explains that the reason for maintaining anonymity is to be able to freely express ideas online. He stated that when he first published negative views about IREN (a NASDAQ-listed stock), he received threats and harassment from dozens of accounts in real life, which is why he chose to remain anonymous.

Nevertheless, the community has slowly pieced together an image of Serenity from various collected fragments of information. It is highly likely he is a Chinese person living in Japan.

Serenity revealed some personal information in late May. He said he is quite international, currently studying Japanese in Japan. Because he once lived in mainland China for a while and frequently traveled to Taiwan, he knows a bit of Chinese. Additionally, he played soccer in Mexico for two or three years and went to South Korea specifically to play League of Legends... His life seems quite comfortable.

Serenity has lived in Japan for at least half a year. At the end of 2025, he often posted photos of his life in Japan on the X platform, but since becoming popular, he rarely mentions his personal life.

Serenity in Japan

Serenity is a high-frequency poster, averaging 9-10 posts per day, peaking at over 20 posts. Analyzing his daily posting frequency with AI shows he has an absolute silence period of about 5 hours each day. This silence period is likely when Serenity is resting or sleeping. This timeframe conveniently corresponds to the early morning hours (3:00 to 8:00) in some Asian time zones (UTC+8, UTC+9). Combined with the previous information, this basically locks Serenity's location to Japan.

The community leans towards believing Serenity is a Chinese person, but Serenity emphasizes that English is his native language. Most of his posts are still in English. Occasionally posting in Chinese seems to be just to cater to Chinese fans. Moreover, if counting posts in different languages, his Japanese post count is even higher than his Chinese post count.

Combining this with Serenity's early experiences—being active on Reddit WSB (Odaily Note: WallStreetBets is the largest retail trading community in the US) before moving to X, rejecting an offer from Nvidia's AI team in 2018, and being reported by overseas renowned media like Bloomberg and Reuters—it's basically possible to rule out Serenity being a Chinese national.

Serenity's anonymous identity, non-transparent investment returns, and excessive desire for influence are all increasing market controversy about him. But interestingly, everyone who questions him is also constantly refreshing his homepage.

Stock investment has always had its own icons for each era: Warren Buffett, Cathie Wood, Roaring Kitty. Every era has its own spiritual totem. A bull market amplifies returns and also amplifies beliefs. When more and more people start making money, we always want to find someone who can "scientifically explain the bubble." Serenity might just be the outward projection of this round of AI bull market sentiment—mysterious, professional, successful, fitting all the public's imagination of a "stock god."

But next to the altar is the chopping block. Because when the market turns, people will again want to find someone to blame for the losses, and Serenity might then be the most suitable candidate. History repeats itself, the market always moves forward. People enjoy creating gods and are also skilled at "destroying gods." As for who Serenity really is, it probably isn't that important anymore.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Serenity's claimed investment methodology for selecting stocks in the AI industry?

ASerenity's claimed investment methodology is the 'Chokepoint Investment Method.' He uses this to filter for small monopoly companies within the AI industrial chain that he believes are underpriced or not fully valued by the market.

QWhat immediate market impact did Serenity's 'callouts' of specific A-share stocks have, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Serenity's 'callouts' of specific A-share stocks (Lide Hexie, Yishite, and Zhongji Innolight) immediately led to significant price surges. The first two stocks saw their prices pulled straight up to a 20% daily limit up on the days he mentioned them.

QWhat primary reason does Serenity give for maintaining anonymity online?

ASerenity explains that he maintains anonymity to freely express his ideas online. He cites an incident where he faced threats and harassment from numerous accounts after posting negative views about a stock (IREN) as the reason for choosing to remain anonymous.

QBased on community analysis in the article, what is the most likely identity and location of Serenity?

ABased on community analysis of his posting patterns, personal disclosures, and shared photos, the article suggests Serenity is most likely a Chinese person residing in Japan. His posts show activity patterns aligning with Asian time zones, and he has shared details about living in Japan and learning Japanese.

QAccording to the article's analysis, what are Serenity's potential motivations, beyond just 'for fun'?

AThe article suggests that while Serenity may claim his actions are 'for fun' and not for profit, he likely seeks fame and influence. His subscriber count surged significantly after his A-share callouts, generating substantial monthly income from his paid subscription service. His public celebration of surpassing Elon Musk in subscriber numbers also indicates a desire for recognition.

Letture associate

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit10 min fa

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit10 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit25 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit25 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片