TurboFlow Announces Strategic Partnership with Global Giant Susquehanna Crypto, Introducing Wall Street Institutional-Grade Liquidity and Dynamic Odds Market Structure Support

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-05-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-13

Introduzione

TurboFlow announces a strategic partnership with Susquehanna Crypto, a leading global proprietary digital asset trading firm. As part of this collaboration, Susquehanna Crypto will act as an on-chain liquidity provider and market maker for all TurboFlow products. This partnership brings institutional-grade liquidity, market-making support, and expertise in professional trading, market structure, price discovery, and risk management to the TurboFlow ecosystem. This marks a significant milestone for TurboFlow as it expands its product suite, which includes perpetual contracts and newly launched Event Contracts with durations as short as 30 seconds. Enhanced liquidity depth, efficient price discovery, and market stability are becoming increasingly critical for user experience. Notably, TurboFlow is transitioning its Event Contracts from a traditional fixed-odds model to a more dynamic, market-driven odds structure. Susquehanna Crypto will inject deep liquidity through TurboFlow's proprietary PFOF (Payment for Order Flow) architecture. This aims to ensure minimal slippage and millisecond-level execution for users, even during extreme market volatility, whether trading 1000x leveraged perpetuals or short-duration event contracts. Looking ahead, TurboFlow plans to onboard more top-tier institutional market makers to build a diversified liquidity network. The platform will continue expanding its product ecosystem across several verticals: Event Contracts (extending to assets like...

At TurboFlow, we believe everyone should have a seat at the market. Market opportunities, trading tools, and execution quality should not be limited to a few professional participants. TurboFlow is dedicated to making trading simpler, more accessible, and more engaging, allowing ordinary users to truly participate in the next phase of on-chain trading.

Today, TurboFlow formally announces a strategic partnership with Susquehanna Crypto, a leading global proprietary digital asset trading firm. Through this collaboration, Susquehanna Crypto will serve as an on-chain liquidity provider, offering liquidity and market-making support for TurboFlow's full product line, and bringing its institutional expertise in professional trading, market structure, price discovery, and risk management into the TurboFlow ecosystem.

This partnership marks a significant milestone in TurboFlow's development. As TurboFlow continues to expand its product matrix, including perpetual contracts and the recently launched Event Contracts with trading cycles as short as 30 seconds, liquidity depth, efficient price discovery, and market stability are becoming increasingly crucial for user experience.

Particularly in the event contract market, TurboFlow is transitioning from a traditional fixed-odds mechanism to a more dynamic and market-driven odds structure. Dynamic odds will adjust based on real-time market conditions, liquidity depth, directional demand, volatility, and risk exposure, making event contract pricing more closely resemble a real market structure.

Susquehanna Crypto's Role: The "Nuclear Reactor" of Liquidity

As one of the world's most formidable options and derivatives market makers, Susquehanna Crypto will inject deep liquidity directly through TurboFlow's proprietary PFOF (Payment for Order Flow) architecture. This means that even during periods of extreme volatility, TurboFlow users can execute trades for 1000x leverage perpetual contracts or 30-second cycle Event Contracts with minimal slippage and millisecond-level execution.

Future Vision: Simplifying Complex Financial Products

Moving forward, TurboFlow plans to onboard more top-tier institutional market makers and build a diversified liquidity network. Building upon this foundation, TurboFlow will continue to expand its product ecosystem across multiple trading verticals:

  1. Event Contracts: Currently focused primarily on mainstream crypto assets like BTC and ETH, with trading cycles as short as 30 seconds. TurboFlow plans to gradually expand to more global market assets such as crude oil and gold, and through the dynamic odds mechanism, provide users with a more market-driven pricing experience.

  2. Prediction Markets & Telegram Mini App: Upcoming prediction-based products and a mobile-first trading experience will be built upon TurboFlow's continuously expanding liquidity and pricing infrastructure.

  3. Perpetual Contracts: Supported by deeper institutional liquidity, providing users with a high-leverage perpetual contract trading experience.

About TurboFlow

TurboFlow is an on-chain trading platform that redefines the trading experience for ordinary users, dedicated to making trading a simple, accessible game for everyone, empowering retail traders to truly lead the second half of trading. The platform currently offers high-leverage perpetual contracts and event contracts, combining professional-grade trading infrastructure with retail-friendly product experiences.

About Susquehanna Crypto

Susquehanna Crypto is a leading global proprietary digital asset trading firm, registered and headquartered in Nassau, Bahamas, with offices in London, Hong Kong, New York City, and Bala Cynwyd. With decades of experience, Susquehanna Crypto is committed to bridging the gap between traditional finance and digital asset markets, providing liquidity support to the digital asset ecosystem through a range of complementary business lines, including digital asset derivatives, on-chain strategies (including on-chain prediction markets), early-stage venture capital, and token market making.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the significance of TurboFlow's strategic partnership with Susquehanna Crypto?

AThe partnership is a significant milestone that brings institutional-grade liquidity and market-making support from Susquehanna Crypto, a leading global digital asset trading firm. It provides deeper liquidity and professional trading expertise to TurboFlow's product lines, enhancing price discovery, market stability, and user experience, especially for products like perpetual contracts and short-cycle event contracts.

QWhat specific benefits will TurboFlow users gain from Susquehanna Crypto's role as a liquidity provider?

AThrough TurboFlow's proprietary PFOF (Payment for Order Flow) architecture, Susquehanna Crypto will inject deep liquidity. This means TurboFlow users can trade products like 1000x leverage perpetual contracts and 30-second event contracts with minimal slippage and millisecond-level execution, even during periods of extreme market volatility.

QHow is TurboFlow's Event Contracts market structure evolving, and what is the key feature of this evolution?

ATurboFlow is upgrading its Event Contracts market from a traditional fixed-odds mechanism to a more dynamic and market-driven odds structure. The key feature is dynamic odds, which adjust in real-time based on market conditions, liquidity depth, directional demand, volatility, and risk exposure, making pricing more reflective of true market structure.

QWhat are TurboFlow's future product development plans as mentioned in the article?

ATurboFlow plans to expand its product ecosystem across several verticals: 1) Expanding Event Contracts to include assets like crude oil and gold, 2) Launching prediction market products and a Telegram Mini App for mobile-first trading, and 3) Enhancing its Perpetual Contracts offering with deeper institutional liquidity support.

QWho is Susquehanna Crypto and what are its main areas of business in the digital asset ecosystem?

ASusquehanna Crypto is a leading global proprietary digital asset trading firm headquartered in Nassau, Bahamas, with offices in London, Hong Kong, New York City, and Bala Cynwyd. Its business lines include digital asset derivatives, on-chain strategies (including on-chain prediction markets), early-stage venture capital, and token market-making, aiming to bridge traditional finance and digital assets.

Letture associate

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit2 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit2 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手25 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手25 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit58 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit58 min fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片