Trust Wallet Users Lost $7 Million in Cryptocurrency Due to Hack

RBK-cryptoPubblicato 2025-12-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-26

Introduzione

On December 26, the team behind Trust Wallet, a popular cryptocurrency wallet owned by Binance, reported a security breach affecting the browser extension version 2.68. According to Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, the incident was the result of a hack, resulting in losses of approximately $7 million. Users of the compromised version were advised to disable or uninstall it and upgrade to the secure version 2.69. The breach did not impact the mobile application. Trust Wallet's native token (TWT) initially dropped around 7% in price but recovered after the official announcement. Zhao stated that Trust Wallet would cover all user losses and urged affected individuals to contact support. Although no official cause was confirmed, reports suggest that version 2.68 contained hidden malicious code that intercepted users' secret recovery phrases during wallet imports, sending them to an external server. This allowed attackers to gain full access to affected wallets. Some community members, including Zhao, suspect the breach may have been an inside job involving a team member.

On the night of December 26, the team of the popular cryptocurrency wallet Trust Wallet reported a security breach that affected the browser application version 2.68. As explained by Binance founder and head of YZi Labs, which owns Trust Wallet, Changpeng Zhao, the incident occurred as a result of a hacker attack, and the damage amounted to $7 million.

Users of version 2.68 should disable or delete this build and only then install the new version 2.69, and under no circumstances should they open or use the unsafe version. The hack only concerns the browser version 2.68 and did not affect the mobile application.

The native token of Trust Wallet (TWT) reacted with a price drop of about 7%, falling for three hours before the team's announcement around 01:20 Moscow time on December 26. After the official announcement, the TWT price recovered to previous levels and the asset is trading slightly below $0.83.

Zhao stated that Trust Wallet will cover all user losses, and affected users were asked to write to the wallet's support service, a link to which can be found on the official website.

No official statements have been made regarding the causes of the hack. But its essence, according to a report by user Akinator on social network X, may be that a hidden malicious code was embedded in version 2.68 of the Trust Wallet browser extension. Akinator was one of the few who reported the hack several hours before the official confirmation from Trust Wallet.

The assumption is that when a user enters their secret phrase to import a wallet, this code stealthily intercepts the data and sends it to an external server. In this way, the attackers could gain full access to the users' wallets and funds.

The crypto community believes that the malicious code was embedded by someone from the cryptocurrency wallet team. In response to a suggestion by X user under the nickname Crazino.eth that the hack was "certainly carried out by an insider working in the team," Zhao replied "probably."

Broke the cycle. How the price of Bitcoin changed over 10 years at Christmas

AI outperformed humans in a crypto trading tournament. What were the results

Miner "capitulation" called a bullish factor for Bitcoin. Why

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the total amount of cryptocurrency lost by Trust Wallet due to the hack?

AUsers lost $7 million in cryptocurrency due to the hack.

QWhich specific version of the Trust Wallet application was compromised in the security breach?

AThe security breach affected the browser application version 2.68.

QWhat was the impact on Trust Wallet's native token (TWT) price following the incident?

AThe native token TWT initially dropped by approximately 7% but recovered to its previous levels after the official announcement, trading slightly below $0.83.

QAccording to the article, how did the alleged malware in version 2.68 potentially steal user funds?

AThe hidden malicious code allegedly intercepted a user's secret recovery phrase during wallet import and sent it to an external server, giving attackers full access to the wallets and funds.

QWho did the crypto community and Binance's Changpeng Zhao suggest might be responsible for the hack?

AThe crypto community and Changpeng Zhao suggested that the hack was likely carried out by an insider within the Trust Wallet team.

Letture associate

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit1 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手2 h fa

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbit2 h fa

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbit2 h fa

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

Liberland's congress has voted to remove Technology Secretary Dorian Stern Vukotić, following a resolution accusing him of attempting to hijack the Liberland.org domain, removing administrative multisig protections, blocking the president from voting, and launching unauthorized tokens. The incident serves as a case study in blockchain governance, highlighting risks that go beyond smart contracts to include control over domains, admin keys, and off-chain authority. For the crypto industry, it underscores the need to scrutinize decentralization claims against operational realities, where a small group can still compromise governance. The story reflects a broader market shift where infrastructure security and governance are becoming as critical as price action. Editorial framing should treat the development as a verified information signal about governance risks, avoiding overstatement of Liberland's legal status and leaving room for follow-up evidence.

bitcoinist3 h fa

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

bitcoinist3 h fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit4 h fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures