Trump Tweets After Hours, Pushing On-Chain Perpetual Contracts into the Mainstream

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-24

Introduzione

Trump, who calls himself the "Crypto President," is also driving the adoption of perpetual futures contracts. He frequently makes market-moving statements outside traditional trading hours, coinciding with the rise of 24/7 trading infrastructure. Over a single weekend, Hyperliquid’s S&P 500 proxy product experienced three major price swings triggered by Trump’s tweets—first rising on positive remarks, then falling after a threat against Iran, and surging again following claims of diplomatic progress (later denied by Iran). This highlights a structural shift toward perpetual contracts and round-the-clock markets. Perpetual DEX trading volume reached $739 billion in January 2026, accounting for 10.2% of all crypto perpetual trading—up from just 2.0% two years prior. While it remains uncertain whether perps will dominate traditional finance, growth is undeniable. Recent developments, like Katana’s acquisition of IDEX and the launch of Katana Perps, signal increasing momentum. Regulatory clarity and macro risks are accelerating the move toward 24/7 trading, where price discovery happens continuously.

Author: FintechFrank

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: This article captures an ongoing structural shift: Trump's habit of making market-moving statements after the market closes, which coincides with the rise of 24/7 trading infrastructure. The S&P 500 proxy product on Hyperliquid experienced three significant fluctuations triggered by Trump's tweets over the same weekend. This is not a coincidence but a preview of a new normal.

Full Text Below:

Trump calls himself the "Crypto President," but in many ways, he is also the "Perpetual Contracts President."

It is well-known that Trump doesn't sleep, and he doesn't hesitate to make statements that can shake the market outside of traditional trading hours. This is a peculiar yet fitting backdrop: the market is evolving toward 24/7 trading, and we happen to have a president who can best be described as "spontaneous and sometimes chaotic."

This dynamic was fully demonstrated over the weekend.

Just days after S&P Global announced it would authorize trading of the S&P 500 on Hyperliquid, Trump stated on Friday afternoon after the market closed that the U.S. is "very close to achieving our goals." The S&P 500 proxy product on Hyperliquid immediately rose.

Then, on Saturday at 7:44 PM Eastern Time, Trump escalated his threats, warning that he would strike Iran's power facilities if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened. The reaction was instantaneous: the S&P 500 on Hyperliquid immediately fell.

But it didn't end there. On Monday morning, Trump claimed that the U.S. and Iran had held talks on a "comprehensive and thorough resolution of hostilities." S&P 500 futures surged by over 3.5%. Iran later denied Trump's statement.

Trump's presidency may not be driving the arrival of 24/7 markets, but it has made it impossible to ignore the issue.

It remains unclear which perpetual contract product will dominate or whether perpetual contracts will become the primary structure for 24/7 markets. Futures have historically been far less familiar to U.S. retail investors than options, and whether traditional brokerages can successfully promote these products to their customer base remains an open question. I am skeptical. What works in crypto markets may not seamlessly translate to traditional finance users.

Nevertheless, growth is undeniable.

The open interest on perpetual contract DEX platforms has surged significantly. In January 2026, the trading volume of perpetual contract DEXs reached $739 billion, accounting for 10.2% of the total crypto perpetual contract trading volume on decentralized platforms—compared to just 2.0% two years ago.

As Carlos Guzman and Slater Santer of GSR Research show in the chart, news flow in both centralized and decentralized perpetual contract markets has accelerated since the HYPE TGE:

This morning, there was further momentum within the GSR ecosystem:

Katana acquired the early decentralized exchange IDEX and launched Katana Perps, a platform designed to unify spot and derivatives trading on-chain. This is the first major move by CEO Matthew Fisher since taking office, reflecting a pursuit of controlling more of the trading stack and capturing greater economic value.

This move also highlights a broader shift: the environment for perpetual contracts is becoming increasingly favorable. Here’s how Katana put it:

"This move coincides with U.S. regulators sending clear signals allowing crypto perpetual contracts, marking a potential inflection point for on-chain derivatives. At the same time, trading activity continues to migrate toward 24/7 markets, with price discovery increasingly happening in real-time rather than during fixed trading hours. As global markets adapt to new realities, macro risks no longer wait for trading hours, reinforcing the importance of a continuous 24/7 trading environment."

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding Trump and the financial markets?

AThe article argues that former President Trump, through his habit of making market-moving statements after traditional trading hours, is inadvertently accelerating the adoption and mainstream relevance of 24/7 on-chain perpetual contracts, making him a 'Perpetuals President'.

QWhich platform's S&P 500 proxy product is highlighted as reacting to Trump's tweets?

AThe S&P 500 proxy product on the Hyperliquid platform is highlighted, as it experienced significant price movements in response to a series of Trump's tweets over a single weekend.

QWhat significant change in market share for perpetual DEXs does the article mention?

AThe article states that perpetual DEX trading reached $739 billion in January 2026, accounting for 10.2% of all crypto perpetual trading volume, a significant increase from just 2.0% two years prior.

QWhat recent corporate acquisition and product launch is cited as evidence of growing momentum in the on-chain derivatives space?

AKatana acquired the early decentralized exchange IDEX and launched 'Katana Perps', a platform aiming to unify spot and derivatives trading on-chain.

QAccording to the article, what broader shift in trading is being reinforced by global macro events?

AThe article states that trading activity is shifting towards 24/7 markets, with price discovery happening increasingly in real-time, a trend reinforced by the fact that global macro risks no longer wait for traditional market hours.

Letture associate

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

A jurisdictional battle between the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the state of New Mexico over the regulation of prediction markets could set national rules for the industry. At issue is who polices platforms like Kalshi, with the CFTC asserting federal oversight and New Mexico arguing state gaming and consumer protection laws apply, especially for contracts resembling wagers on events like elections or sports. The outcome will determine if prediction markets can scale nationally under a clear federal framework or face a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory landscape. This dispute is significant for the crypto-adjacent trading community, which often engages with these speculative event markets. A clearer rulebook could boost mainstream adoption, liquidity, and integration with crypto infrastructure, while a state-led challenge could stifle growth. The case is particularly sensitive for sports-related contracts, where the line between financial markets and gambling blurs. Ultimately, this legal fight will shape whether prediction markets become a scalable national product or remain constrained by jurisdictional conflicts.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

bitcoinist1 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit6 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手6 h fa

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbit7 h fa

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbit7 h fa

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

Liberland's congress has voted to remove Technology Secretary Dorian Stern Vukotić, following a resolution accusing him of attempting to hijack the Liberland.org domain, removing administrative multisig protections, blocking the president from voting, and launching unauthorized tokens. The incident serves as a case study in blockchain governance, highlighting risks that go beyond smart contracts to include control over domains, admin keys, and off-chain authority. For the crypto industry, it underscores the need to scrutinize decentralization claims against operational realities, where a small group can still compromise governance. The story reflects a broader market shift where infrastructure security and governance are becoming as critical as price action. Editorial framing should treat the development as a verified information signal about governance risks, avoiding overstatement of Liberland's legal status and leaving room for follow-up evidence.

bitcoinist7 h fa

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

bitcoinist7 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures