Trump Media Plans Truth Social Spin-Off While Crypto Losses Weigh On Finances

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-02

Introduzione

Trump Media & Technology Group is reportedly considering spinning off Truth Social into a separate publicly traded company. The plan involves distributing shares of the new entity to existing investors, potentially followed by a merger with a special-purpose acquisition company. This move comes as the company faces significant financial pressure, having reported a net loss of over $700 million in the past year, largely due to declines in the value of its digital asset holdings. The spin-off would separate Truth Social from the parent company, which recently announced a shift toward energy development through a planned $6 billion merger with TAE Technologies.

Trump Media & Technology Group is weighing a plan to spin off Truth Social into a separate publicly traded company, based on reports released this week. The move is being discussed as the company faces mounting losses tied in part to digital asset holdings. Talks are ongoing, and no final agreement has been signed.

Trump’s Truth Social Could Stand On Its Own

According to reports, the company is considering distributing shares of a new Truth Social entity to existing investors. That standalone company could later merge with a special purpose acquisition company, giving it its own stock listing. The discussions are said to be active but remain subject to board and shareholder approval.

Truth Social has served as the main social platform linked to US President Donald Trump. A spin-off would separate it from the broader corporate structure, which has recently shifted direction. By placing the platform in its own vehicle, the company could allow investors to assess the social media business apart from other ventures now underway.

Reports note that regulatory filings would be required before any transaction is completed. The structure is still being shaped behind closed doors.

BTCUSD now trading at $66,752. Chart: TradingView

Crypto-Related Losses Add Pressure

Financial results have cast a shadow over the company’s plans. Based on recent disclosures, Trump Media posted a net loss of more than $700 million for the past year, a sharp increase from the year before. A large portion of that loss has been linked to changes in the value of digital assets and related financial instruments held on its balance sheet.

Revenue remained modest, hovering in the low millions, while paper losses from asset revaluations expanded. Some of those losses were non-cash items, meaning no money left the company directly. Still, the figures were significant and weighed heavily on overall results.

The crypto exposure has drawn attention because it highlights the risks tied to volatile asset classes. When prices fall, balance sheets can suffer quickly. That impact was felt over the past reporting period, and it has shaped the company’s financial picture.

Energy Deal Reshapes Company Direction

The spin-off talks come after Trump Media agreed to merge with fusion energy firm TAE Technologies in a deal valued at about $6 billion. That agreement signaled a shift away from being seen mainly as a social media operator.

Once that merger is finalized, the company’s core focus would lean more toward energy development. Truth Social, if separated, would operate independently. Shares in the new social media company could be issued to existing holders before the broader restructuring closes.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Trump Media & Technology Group considering for Truth Social, according to recent reports?

ATrump Media & Technology Group is considering spinning off Truth Social into a separate, publicly traded company.

QHow might the proposed Truth Social spin-off be structured for investors?

AThe company is considering distributing shares of a new Truth Social entity to existing investors, and this standalone company could later merge with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) to get its own stock listing.

QWhat major financial issue is pressuring Trump Media's plans, as mentioned in the article?

AThe company posted a net loss of over $700 million for the past year, a large portion of which was linked to losses in the value of its digital asset holdings and related financial instruments.

QWhat recent merger agreement signaled a shift in Trump Media's core business direction?

AThe company agreed to merge with fusion energy firm TAE Technologies in a deal valued at about $6 billion, signaling a shift away from being primarily a social media operator and more toward energy development.

QIf the spin-off and merger proceed, what would happen to Truth Social?

ATruth Social would be separated from the broader corporate structure and operate as an independent company, with its shares potentially distributed to existing holders before the larger restructuring with TAE Technologies is finalized.

Letture associate

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the core driver and largest validator of The Open Network (TON). Key initiatives include a sixfold reduction in transaction fees, performance upgrades, and improved developer tools within the next few weeks. This marks a strategic shift from Telegram merely providing user access to deeply integrating TON into its platform's core infrastructure. The goal is to transform Telegram's massive social traffic into sustainable on-chain activity. While viral mini-apps like Notcoin have demonstrated Telegram's ability to drive user adoption, TON aims to support frequent, low-value transactions inherent to social platforms—such as tipping, in-app payments, and game rewards. Ultra-low fees and sub-second finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to making blockchain interactions seamless and nearly invisible within the Telegram user experience. However, Telegram's increased central role raises questions about network decentralization. Durov argues that Telegram's participation will attract more large validators, thereby enhancing decentralization. TON also offers high annual staking rewards (18.8%), aiming to retain capital within its ecosystem. The fundamental challenge for TON is no longer leveraging Telegram's user base, but becoming an indispensable, seamless infrastructure layer for Telegram's everyday applications—moving from an adjacent chain to an embedded utility.

marsbit2 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

marsbit2 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Telegram's founder, Pavel Durov, has announced a major shift in the development of The Open Network (TON). Telegram will now become the core driver of TON, replacing the TON Foundation and becoming its largest validator. The focus will be on technical upgrades over the next few weeks, including slashing network fees by six times to near-zero and improving finality time to 0.6 seconds. This move signifies a deeper integration between Telegram and TON, moving beyond just providing a user base. The goal is to transform Telegram's vast social traffic and built-in features—like Mini Apps, payments, and bots—into sustainable, on-chain usage scenarios. The reduced fees and faster speeds are crucial for enabling the small, frequent transactions typical of social interactions. While this promises stronger execution and product alignment, it raises questions about centralization. Durov argues Telegram's involvement will attract more validators, enhancing decentralization, but the outcome remains to be seen. Additionally, TON's high annual staking reward of 18.8% aims to retain capital within the ecosystem. The key challenge for TON is no longer just leveraging Telegram's entry point, but becoming an invisible, seamless infrastructure layer within Telegram's daily use. Its success hinges on converting viral attention into lasting, embedded utility.

Odaily星球日报12 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Odaily星球日报12 min fa

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit1 h fa

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit1 h fa

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit1 h fa

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片