Tron Stablecoin Volume Exceeds XRP Activity By More Than 10 Times: Data

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-23

Introduzione

Tron's USDT and USDC stablecoin transfer volume has surged, now exceeding the entire XRP network's activity by more than ten times, according to Glassnode data. The 90-day average for Tron's stablecoin volume stands at $24.2 billion daily, compared to XRP's $2.2 billion. This highlights Tron's significant role as a core settlement layer for stablecoins. Furthermore, stablecoins dominate overall crypto transaction volume. Combined, USDC and USDT process $192 billion daily, nearly double the volume of the top five non-stablecoin assets. USDC leads all assets at $124 billion, followed by Bitcoin ($81B) and USDT ($68B). XRP ranks sixth with its $2.2 billion volume, behind Solana and Ethereum. Meanwhile, XRP's price is trading around $1.93.

Data shows the transaction volume of USDT and USDC on Tron is now more than 10 times the transfer volume of the entire XRP network.

Tron Stablecoin Volume Is Significantly Higher Than XRP Activity

In a new post on X, Glassnode lead research analyst CryptoVizArt.₿ has discussed how stablecoin settlement on the Tron network compares against the transaction activity of XRP. Stablecoins are digital assets that have their value pegged to a fiat currency. The vast majority of this space is currently dominated by two tokens tied to the US dollar: USDT and USDC.

These cryptocurrencies are available on several blockchains, with a major one being Tron. Below is the chart shared by CryptoVizArt.₿ that shows the trend in the 90-day simple moving average (SMA) of the combined transfer volume of USDT and USDC on the network over the last few years.

Looks like the metric has been following an upward trajectory | Source: @CryptoVizArt on X

As displayed in the graph, USDT and USDC have seen their Tron volume follow a rapid uptrend during the last year, suggesting that users have increasingly been using the network for stablecoin settlements.

The 90-day SMA value of the metric is currently sitting at $24.2 billion. In the same chart, the analyst has also attached the data for the transfer volume of the XRP blockchain and from its graph, it’s apparent that the network’s transaction activity pales in comparison to the stablecoin settlement that occurs on Tron.

More specifically, XRP observes just $2.2 billion in transfers every day, a tenth of the Tron stablecoin transactions. “This reinforces Tron’s role as a core settlement layer for stablecoin liquidity,” noted CryptoVizArt.₿.

Glassnode’s official X handle has also made a post about how stablecoins compare against the major cryptocurrencies in terms of the metric.

The trend in the transfer volume of the various top cryptocurrencies | Source: Glassnode on X

As is apparent in the above chart, USDC is currently the most dominant asset in transaction activity out of the major assets with a volume of $124 billion. Bitcoin is second at $81 billion, while USDT is third at $68 billion.

Among the rest, Solana and Ethereum both beat XRP to the fourth and fifth spots with transaction volumes of $9.6 billion and $7.9 billion, respectively. BNB is just behind XRP at $1.6 billion.

The top two stablecoins combined are pulling $192 billion in transaction activity every day, which is almost twice the transfer volume that the top five non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies are witnessing. “Stablecoins have become the primary liquidity rails, while native asset transfers remain comparatively subdued,” said Glassnode.

XRP Price

At the time of writing, XRP is trading around $1.93, down nearly 2% over the last week.

The price of the coin seems to have been moving sideways over the last few days | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current 90-day SMA of the combined transfer volume of USDT and USDC on the Tron network?

AThe 90-day simple moving average (SMA) of the combined transfer volume of USDT and USDC on the Tron network is currently $24.2 billion.

QHow does the daily transfer volume of XRP compare to the Tron stablecoin volume?

AThe daily transfer volume of XRP is $2.2 billion, which is about one-tenth (or 10 times less) than the Tron stablecoin volume.

QAccording to the data, which two assets have the highest daily transfer volume among major cryptocurrencies?

AUSDC has the highest daily transfer volume at $124 billion, and Bitcoin is second with $81 billion.

QWhat role does the data suggest Tron plays in the stablecoin ecosystem?

AThe data reinforces Tron's role as a core settlement layer for stablecoin liquidity.

QWhat was the price of XRP and its weekly performance at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, XRP was trading around $1.93, down nearly 2% over the previous week.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报37 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报37 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News54 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News54 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare TRX

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di TRON (TRX) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente TRONTRX.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva TRON (TRX)Dopo aver acquistato TRON (TRX), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia TRON (TRX)Scambia facilmente TRON (TRX) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

1.6k Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare TRX

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di TRX TRX sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片