Trial 1314 Days Late: Mastermind Behind $40 Billion Stablecoin Collapse Sentenced to 15 Years

marsbitPubblicato 2025-12-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-12

Introduzione

The trial of Do Kwon, the mastermind behind the $40 billion Terra (LUNA) and UST stablecoin collapse, concluded on December 11, 2025, with a 15-year prison sentence. After 1,314 days since the catastrophic crash, Kwon was convicted of orchestrating an "epic, generational-scale fraud" that wiped out life savings for over a million victims and triggered a crypto market crisis, including the fall of FTX. Despite his defense pleading for a five-year term, citing arrogance rather than greed as motive, the judge dismissed it as absurd and deemed the prosecution’s recommended 12 years too lenient. Kwon, who had initially pleaded not guilty, eventually admitted to two counts of conspiracy and wire fraud in August, agreeing to forfeit over $19 million in assets. Victim impact statements revealed devastating losses—homes, retirement funds, and education savings vanished. Many described being misled by Kwon’s false assurances and cult-like influence. In a rare apology, Kwon expressed remorse, acknowledging his "arrogance" and the pain he caused. He may serve half his sentence in the U.S. before potential transfer to South Korea, where he faces additional charges.

Author: Nancy, PANews

On December 11, 2025, 1314 days after the Terra collapse, Do Kwon finally faced justice and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Although this epic fraud case has come to a close, the evaporation of over $40 billion, affecting more than a million victims, stands as an expensive and painful lesson in the history of cryptocurrency development.

Luna Dream Shattered, Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison

On December 11, Do Kwon, wearing the yellow prison uniform of the Essex County Jail in New Jersey, sat at the defense table accompanied by four lawyers. The once-flamboyant crypto tycoon faced his final judgment.

During the hearing, Kwon's defense team attempted an emotional appeal, requesting the judge to limit the sentence to five years. They argued that Kwon's crimes stemmed more from arrogance and desperation than extreme personal greed, noting that he had already served time in Montenegro and might face prosecution in South Korea.

However, this argument was strongly refuted by U.S. prosecutors. They pointed out that the stablecoin concept promoted by Terraform Labs, along with its claimed real-world applications like Chai, was built on lies from the very beginning. At its peak, Kwon's token value soared, and he even named his daughter "Luna" to commemorate what he called his "greatest invention."

Prosecutors emphasized that the $40 billion collapse of the Terra ecosystem not only triggered a chain reaction of crises across the entire crypto market but also indirectly led to the bankruptcy of SBF's FTX exchange and sparked a crypto winter. (Related reading: LUNA and UST in the 'Big Short') Faced with such devastating consequences, Kwon and his supporters attempted to construct a "counter-narrative," portraying the collapse as a black swan event or market manipulation, showing no remorse. Furthermore, Kwon's misappropriation of funds, use of fake passports to flee to Singapore and Montenegro, and even his attempt to travel to the UAE demonstrated his extremely high risk of recidivism. Based on this, prosecutors recommended a 12-year sentence.

However, U.S. District Judge Engelmayer rejected the defense's utterly absurd request for a five-year sentence, while also stating that the prosecution's suggested 12 years was too lenient and failed to reflect the devastating impact on the victims.

"This was an epic, cross-generational scale fraud. In the history of federal prosecutions, few frauds have caused damage comparable to this," Judge Engelmayer sternly rebuked, noting that Kwon could have chosen to tell the truth but instead chose to deceive investors who entrusted their life savings to him, taking a wrong path. He specifically mentioned the infamous tweet: "Deploying more capital – steady lads."

Ultimately, the judge sentenced Kwon to 15 years in prison.

In addition to the U.S., Kwon still faces fraud charges in South Korea. During the hearing, Kwon stated that he had not seen his family for three years and expressed a desire to serve his sentence in South Korea. U.S. prosecutors indicated that if Kwon complies with the agreement, they would support his application to be transferred to South Korea to serve the remainder of his sentence after completing half of it. In August of this year, Kwon pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud and wire fraud, and as part of the plea agreement, he also agreed to forfeit over $19 million in assets and some real estate.

Over a Million Victims, Mysterious Community Influence

From his arrest at Podgorica Airport in Montenegro in March 2023 to his incarceration in the U.S. in December 2024, this 20-month legal battle finally reached its conclusion in a federal courtroom in New York.

Kwon's arrest once sparked an extradition battle between the U.S. and South Korea. During this period, he reached a settlement with the U.S. SEC for a staggering $4.5 billion, including $3.6 billion in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. After more than a year of detention and diplomatic maneuvering, Montenegrin authorities finally handed him over to U.S. law enforcement late last year. Facing nine U.S. charges, including securities fraud and wire fraud, Kwon initially pleaded not guilty.

It wasn't until August this year that Kwon admitted to two counts of financial fraud, stating, "I concealed the truth about trading companies intervening to restore the peg, made false statements, and my actions were wrong." Given his guilty plea, although the statutory maximum sentence was 25 years, U.S. prosecutors recommended a sentence of no more than 12 years.

This trial was not only about Kwon's personal fate but also touched the nerves of millions of Terra victims worldwide.

However, a hiccup occurred just before the hearing. Judge Engelmayer expressed dissatisfaction with the inefficiency of the U.S. prosecutors, who did notifiy Terra victims until December 1st. The bankruptcy administrator delayed sending emails until December 8th, leaving victims almost no time to submit statements to the court. Judge Engelmayer believed that while the Terra bankruptcy case involved approximately 16,500 creditors, the number of actual victims could be as high as a million, stating, "You need to do better."

Judge Engelmayer stayed up late reading the 315 hastily submitted victim letters and stated bluntly that Kwon held an almost mystical control over Terra investors; many were like cult followers who had drunk the Kool-Aid and would never wake up.

During the hearing, the victims' accusations provided a more直观的 (intuitive - note: this Chinese word was left in the original text, meaning 'intuitive' or 'direct') sense of the devastating impact of the Terra collapse. Some lost their homes, others lost their retirement savings and their children's education funds, and some even became homeless.

One victim wrote, "All of Do Kwon's communication said everything was under control. Then the depeg happened, and I didn't dare close my eyes for four consecutive days... We were told to trust him, and then he disappeared." Another victim angrily accused, "My trust was weaponized. Do Kwon packaged himself as a visionary, and my hard-earned capital just evaporated." Another person lost $200,000 saved over 17 years overnight and pleaded in a letter, "Your Honor, please hold him accountable."

Kwon, who listened to parts of some letters via telephone, expressed a belated apology to the victims in court. "Their stories are heartbreaking and make me realize once again the enormous loss I caused. I want to tell these victims that I am sorry. For the past few years, almost every waking moment I have spent thinking about what I could have done differently then and what I can do now to make amends." In a letter submitted to the court last month, Kwon also wrote, "Looking back, I cannot understand my own arrogance... I bear the pain of everyone alone. I hope accepting any sentence can bring even a little comfort to those I have failed."

This忏悔 (repentance - note: this Chinese word was left in the original text, meaning 'repentance') contrasted sharply with his former arrogant image. Just hours before the Terra collapse in May 2022, Kwon was still mocking critics on Twitter, even leaving behind the arrogant remark, "I don't debate the poor."

Note: Do Kwon's arrogant response to Frances Coppola's质疑 (doubts - note: this Chinese word was left in the original text, meaning 'doubts' or 'questions') about the algorithmic stablecoin design

An ironic scene also unfolded at the trial. As Kwon, wearing a yellow prison uniform and handcuffs, was escorted into the elevator, there were still many supporters applauding him, with some even shouting, "Hang in there, Do! Hold your head high!"

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the sentence given to Do Kwon for his role in the Terra collapse?

ADo Kwon was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

QHow much financial damage was caused by the collapse of the Terra ecosystem according to the article?

AThe collapse of the Terra ecosystem caused $40 billion in financial damage.

QWhat was the name of the company founded by Do Kwon that was central to this case?

AThe company was called Terraform Labs.

QWhat specific charges did Do Kwon plead guilty to in August?

AIn August, Do Kwon pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud and wire fraud.

QWhat did the judge say about Do Kwon's influence over the Terra investors?

AThe judge stated that Do Kwon had an almost mystical hold over Terra investors, with many described as being in a trance-like state, akin to cult followers who would never wake up.

Letture associate

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit50 min fa

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit50 min fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1 h fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1 h fa

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1 h fa

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1 h fa

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1 h fa

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片