Tiger Research: How Is This Crypto Winter Different?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-04

Introduzione

Tiger Research analyzes the distinct nature of the current crypto market downturn, arguing it differs fundamentally from past "crypto winters." Previous cycles were triggered by internal industry crises—the Mt. Gox hack, ICO scams, and the FTX collapse—which shattered trust and drove talent away. In contrast, the recent market movement is driven by external factors: the approval of Bitcoin ETFs fueled the bull run, while tariff policies and interest rate shifts caused the decline. Post-regulation, the market has fragmented into three layers: a compliant zone (e.g., tokenized RWA, regulated exchanges), a non-compliant zone (speculative, experimental apps), and shared infrastructure (e.g., stablecoins, oracles). Capital no longer flows between these layers as before; ETF inflows remain largely confined to Bitcoin within the compliant zone and do not trickle down to altcoins. For the next bull market to emerge, two conditions are necessary: a new killer application must originate from the non-compliant zone (similar to how DeFi summer began), and the macro environment must become supportive (e.g., with lower interest rates). The era of a unified "crypto season" where all assets rally together is likely over due to this market segmentation.

Author: Ryan Yoon

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: As the market enters a downward cycle, skepticism towards the crypto market is growing. Tiger Research believes this time is different from the past: previous winters were triggered by internal issues (Mt. Gox hack, ICO scams, FTX collapse), while this cycle's rise and fall are both driven by external factors (ETF approval brought the bull market, tariff policies and interest rates caused the decline).

Post-regulation, the market has split into three layers: the compliant zone, the non-compliant zone, and shared infrastructure. Capital no longer flows via 'trickle-down' effects as it did before. ETF capital stays with Bitcoin and does not flow into altcoins.

The next bull run requires two conditions: a killer app must emerge from the non-compliant zone + a supportive macro environment.

Full text below:

As the market enters a downward cycle, skepticism towards the crypto market is growing. The question now is, have we entered a crypto winter?

Core View

Crypto winters follow a sequence: Major event → Collapse of trust → Talent drain
Past winters were caused by internal problems; the current rise and fall are driven by external factors; it is neither winter nor spring
Post-regulation, the market has split into three layers: Compliant zone, Non-compliant zone, Shared infrastructure; The trickle-down effect has disappeared
ETF capital stays with Bitcoin; it does not flow out of the compliant zone
The next bull run requires a killer use case + a supportive macro environment

1. How did the previous crypto winters unfold?

The first winter occurred in 2014. Mt. Gox was the exchange handling 70% of global Bitcoin trading volume at the time. Approximately 850,000 BTC disappeared in a hack, causing a collapse in market trust. New exchanges with internal controls and audit functions emerged, and trust began to recover. Ethereum also entered the world through ICOs, opening up new possibilities for vision and fundraising methods.

This ICO wave became the catalyst for the next bull market. When anyone could issue a token and raise funds, the 2017 boom was ignited. Projects raising billions with just a whitepaper flooded in, but most had no substance.

In 2018, regulatory measures poured out from South Korea, China, and the US, the bubble burst, and the second winter arrived. This winter did not end until 2020. Post-COVID, liquidity poured in, and DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave gained attention, bringing capital back.

The third winter was the most severe. When Terra-Luna collapsed in 2022, Celsius, Three Arrows Capital, and FTX collapsed in turn. This wasn't just a simple price drop; the very structure of the industry was shaken. In January 2024, the US SEC approved the spot Bitcoin ETF, followed by the Bitcoin halving and Trump's pro-crypto policies, and capital began to flow in again.

2. The Crypto Winter Pattern: Major Event → Collapse of Trust → Talent Drain

All three winters followed the same sequence. A major event occurs, trust collapses, talent leaves.

It always starts with a major event. The Mt. Gox hack, ICO regulation, and the FTX bankruptcy following the Terra-Luna collapse. The scale and form of each event were different, but the result was the same. The entire market was thrown into shock.

Shock quickly spread into a collapse of trust. Those who had been discussing what to build next began to question whether cryptocurrency was truly meaningful technology. The collaborative atmosphere among builders disappeared, and they began to blame each other for who was responsible.

Doubt led to a talent drain. The builders who had been creating new momentum in blockchain fell into doubt. In 2014, they moved to fintech and big tech companies. In 2018, they moved to institutions and AI. They went to places that seemed more certain.

3. Is the current situation a crypto winter?

The pattern of past crypto winters is visible today.

Major Event:
Trump's tariff policies caused market turbulence
Shift in Federal Reserve interest rate policy
Overall crypto market decline
Collapse of Trust: Skepticism is spreading within the industry. The focus has shifted from what to build next to mutual blame.
Pressure of Talent Drain: The AI industry is growing rapidly. It promises faster exits and greater wealth than crypto.

However, it's hard to call this a crypto winter. Past winters erupted from within the industry. Mt. Gox was hacked, most ICO projects were exposed as scams, FTX collapsed. The industry itself lost trust.

Now it's different.

ETF approval started the bull market, tariff policies and interest rates drove the decline. External factors lifted the market, external factors also pushed it down.

Builders are not leaving either.

RWA, perpDEX (perpetual decentralized exchanges), prediction markets, InfoFi, privacy. New narratives keep emerging, they are still being created. They haven't pulled the entire market like DeFi did, but they haven't disappeared either. The industry hasn't collapsed; the external environment has changed.

We didn't create spring, so there is no winter.

4. Changes in Market Structure Post-Regulation

Behind this is a major shift in market structure post-regulation. The market has split into three layers: 1) The Compliant Zone, 2) The Non-Compliant Zone, and 3) Shared Infrastructure.

The Compliant Zone includes RWA tokenization, exchanges, institutional custody, prediction markets, and compliance-based DeFi. They undergo audits, make disclosures, and have legal protection. Growth is slow, but the capital scale is large and stable.

However, once in the compliant zone, it's hard to expect explosive returns like in the past. Volatility is lower, and potential upside is limited. But downside risk is also limited.

On the other hand, the Non-Compliant Zone will become more speculative in the future. The barrier to entry is low, and speed is fast. Scenarios of 100x in one day and -90% the next will happen more frequently.

However, this space is not meaningless. Industries born in the non-compliant zone are creative, and once validated, they move into the compliant zone. DeFi did this, prediction markets are doing it now. It acts as an experimental field. But the non-compliant zone itself will become increasingly separated from compliant zone businesses.

Shared Infrastructure includes stablecoins and oracles. They are used in both the compliant and non-compliant zones. The same USDC is used for institutional RWA payments and for Pump.fun trading. Oracles provide data for tokenized treasury validation and for anonymous DEX liquidations.

In other words, as the market splits, capital flows have also changed.

In the past, when Bitcoin rose, altcoins rose too through a trickle-down effect. Now it's different. Institutional capital entering through ETFs stays with Bitcoin, full stop. Compliant zone capital does not flow into the non-compliant zone. Liquidity only stays where value has been proven. And even Bitcoin has not yet proven its value as a safe-haven asset relative to risk assets.

5. Conditions for the Next Bull Run

Regulation is being sorted out. Builders are still building. So two things remain.

First, a new killer use case must emerge from the non-compliant zone. Something that creates value that didn't exist before, like DeFi Summer in 2020. AI agents, InfoFi, and on-chain social are candidates, but they haven't reached the scale to drive the entire market yet. The process where experiments in the non-compliant zone are validated and move into the compliant zone must be recreated. DeFi did this, prediction markets are doing it now.

Second, the macroeconomic environment. Even if regulation is sorted out, builders are building, and infrastructure is accumulating, if the macroeconomic environment is not supportive, the upside is limited. The 2020 DeFi Summer erupted when liquidity was released post-COVID. The post-ETF approval rise in 2024 also coincided with expectations of rate cuts. No matter how the crypto industry performs, it cannot control interest rates and liquidity. For what the industry builds to gain traction, the macroeconomic environment must turn.

A 'crypto season' where everything rises together like in the past is unlikely to reappear. Because the market has split. The compliant zone grows steadily, the non-compliant zone experiences big rises and falls.

The next bull run will come. But it won't come for everyone.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main difference between the current crypto market downturn and previous crypto winters according to Tiger Research?

AThe current downturn is driven by external factors (tariff policies and interest rates), while previous crypto winters were caused by internal industry issues like the Mt. Gox hack, ICO scams, and the FTX collapse.

QHow has the market structure changed post-regulation as described in the article?

AThe market has split into three layers: the compliant zone (regulated entities), the non-compliant zone (speculative and experimental projects), and shared infrastructure (used by both, like stablecoins and oracles).

QWhy does ETF capital no longer flow into altcoins as it did in the past?

AETF capital remains within the compliant zone and stays primarily in Bitcoin, as institutional investors focus on proven value rather than speculative altcoins, breaking the previous 'trickle-down' effect.

QWhat two conditions are necessary for the next crypto bull run according to the article?

AA killer application must emerge from the non-compliant zone (similar to DeFi Summer in 2020), and the macroeconomic environment must become supportive (e.g., lower interest rates and increased liquidity).

QWhat pattern did all three previous crypto winters follow?

AThey followed a sequence: a major event (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, ICO regulatory crackdown, Terra-Luna collapse) leading to a loss of trust, which then caused talent to leave the industry for more stable sectors.

Letture associate

Michael Saylor: 'We Never Said We Would Never Sell Bitcoin'

Michael Saylor stated that his company never made a commitment to never sell its bitcoin holdings, though it expects to remain a net buyer of bitcoin long-term. His comments came following reports that the company had received new authorization to sell up to $5 billion in bitcoin. Saylor clarified that this authorization is not new and was announced on June 29th as part of the company's capital management strategy. He emphasized that the authorization permits but does not obligate sales for specific purposes and that no new approval has been announced. Saylor also noted the company never officially adopted a "bitcoin will never be sold" policy.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Michael Saylor: 'We Never Said We Would Never Sell Bitcoin'

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

The 'Summer Saw' Continues: A Break Above $67,000 Could Signal the Start of Bitcoin's Rally

Bitcoin continues to consolidate within a $58,000–$67,000 range, with its price dropping to $62,217 on August 1st. Analysts are divided on the next direction. Trader Crypto Candy suggests a potential drop towards $60,000 if the price remains below $66,000. Investor Jelle refers to the prolonged sideways movement as a "summer saw" and maintains a dollar-cost averaging strategy. The key upside scenario hinges on a breakout above $67,000. Daan Crypto Trades states that without this, the movement risks being just an extended pause. Roman projects a sharper rise to $70,000–$80,000+ if a breakout occurs with sufficient volume. Macro-analyst Gert van Lagen views this as an accumulation phase within a multi-year "cup and handle" pattern. He notes that long-term holders are refusing to sell, as indicated by the NUPL metric staying far from capitulation. In summary, the market is in an accumulation phase, with the $60,000 and $67,000 levels being critical. A break above $67,000 could initiate significant growth, while a fall below $60,000 may lead to further decline. The recent pullback shows that legislative catalysts have provided only short-lived momentum, raising questions about the sustainability of any future breakout attempts.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

The 'Summer Saw' Continues: A Break Above $67,000 Could Signal the Start of Bitcoin's Rally

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Must-Watch Events Next Week｜CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbit1 h fa

Must-Watch Events Next Week｜CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbit1 h fa

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbit2 h fa

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbit2 h fa

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit5 h fa

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit5 h fa

Trading

Spot