THIS is the stablecoin power angle that nobody is talking about

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-02

Introduzione

Dollar-backed stablecoins are increasingly serving as a tool for the U.S. to extend its monetary influence abroad without physically moving dollars overseas, according to a Rabobank report. When foreign entities demand dollar stablecoins, U.S. issuers convert this demand into Treasury bill purchases, helping fund U.S. deficits at lower rates while digital tokens circulate internationally. This mechanism allows dollars to remain within the U.S. financial system while still facilitating global trade. Non-USD stablecoins are also gaining traction, with their supply surging 260% over the past year to a combined market cap of $1.55 billion, though they remain small compared to dollar-pegged alternatives. A key application driving adoption is crypto-backed payment cards, which have grown into an $18 billion market. Monthly transaction volumes have increased from $100 million in early 2023 to over $1.5 billion, growing at an annual rate exceeding 100%. These cards operate on top of traditional networks like Visa and Mastercard, using stablecoins to settle transactions in the background while maintaining a familiar user experience. In summary, dollar-backed stablecoins are expanding U.S. monetary power digitally without exporting physical dollars, while crypto payment infrastructure accelerates their real-world use.

Dollar-backed stablecoins are now more than just a crypto payment tool. Recent reports say that they may also be helping the U.S. extend dollar influence abroad, in a way that keeps real capital at home.

Here’s what you need to know.

Stablecoins – A secret weapon?

A report by Rabobank has stated that dollar-backed stablecoins are spreading dollar influence, without letting real dollars leave the country.

Source: X

The idea is that when a foreign firm wants a dollar stablecoin, a U.S. issuer converts that demand into Treasury bill purchases. Dollars flow back to the U.S. government, helping fund deficits at lower rates, while the firm gets digital dollars instead of cash.

In trade, it goes a step further. U.S. importers can pay exporters in stablecoins, while the underlying dollars stay parked in Treasuries. Only tokens move across borders.

With comparisons to the Soviet-era trade ruble, dollars are exported digitally… all while keeping the power at home.

Non-dollar stablecoins step up

That growing influence hasn’t gone unnoticed, with non-USD-pegged alternatives gaining ground.

For long, more than 99% of stablecoins were pegged to the U.S. dollar. That number is now decreasing at the margins.

Over the past year, non-USD stablecoins have surged 260% in supply, pushing their combined market cap to about $1.55 billion.

Source: X

It’s still small next to dollar-backed giants, but it certainly matters.

All of this theory matters because…

…it’s already showing up in day-to-day payments. One of the fastest-growing payment modes for stablecoins right now is crypto cards.

Source: X

Once a niche product, crypto cards are now an $18 billion market.

Monthly volumes went from about $100 million in early 2023 to over $1.5 billion today, growing at a 100%+ annual rate.

Source: X

Importantly, these cards don’t replace Visa or Mastercard.

Rather, they sit on top of them. Stablecoins fund the transaction in the background, while card networks handle acceptance. For users and merchants, what looks like normal payments are actually digital dollars doing the work.

Final Thoughts

Dollar-backed stablecoins are exporting U.S. monetary power, without exporting actual dollars.
As crypto cards grow, digital dollars are moving fast.

Domande pertinenti

QHow are dollar-backed stablecoins helping the U.S. extend dollar influence abroad without exporting real dollars?

ADollar-backed stablecoins allow foreign firms to obtain digital dollars while U.S. issuers convert that demand into Treasury bill purchases. This keeps actual dollars within the U.S., helping fund deficits at lower rates, while only tokens move across borders.

QWhat is the current market trend for non-USD-pegged stablecoins?

ANon-USD stablecoins have surged 260% in supply over the past year, reaching a combined market cap of approximately $1.55 billion, though they remain small compared to dollar-backed stablecoins.

QHow are crypto cards contributing to the growth of stablecoin payments?

ACrypto cards, now an $18 billion market, use stablecoins to fund transactions in the background while leveraging traditional card networks like Visa or Mastercard for acceptance. Monthly volumes grew from $100 million in early 2023 to over $1.5 billion, with a 100%+ annual growth rate.

QWhat role do U.S. Treasury bills play in the stablecoin ecosystem?

AWhen foreign demand for dollar stablecoins arises, U.S. issuers purchase Treasury bills with the incoming dollars, effectively recycling foreign demand into U.S. government debt and keeping capital domestically parked.

QWhy are non-USD stablecoins gaining traction despite the dominance of dollar-backed options?

ANon-USD stablecoins are growing as alternatives to reduce reliance on U.S. dollar influence, with a 260% supply increase reflecting heightened interest in diversified digital currency pegs.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit9 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit9 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手9 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手9 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit12 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit12 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手13 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手13 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit14 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit14 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures