These Vibe Coding Crypto Mini-Games Are So Addictive

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-20

Introduzione

The article explores the rising popularity of "vibe coding" in the cryptocurrency space, focusing on small, addictive games that deliver rapid dopamine hits through instant feedback. Initially skeptical of such trends, the author was convinced after trying games like *Rug Pull Simulator* (a token launch simulation), a meme-trading escape game, and *Vesting Victim* (an FDV guessing game). These games thrive on immediate, repetitive rewards—whether through strategic decision-making, timing the market, or testing valuation intuition—rather than long-term value or complex narratives. Vibe coding leverages AI tools to quickly turn ideas into playable demos, capitalizing on low development costs and high social media virality. It represents a shift toward instant gratification in a market where long-term promises have lost credibility, offering a form of "industrialized dopamine" that is highly engaging, if not necessarily profound. The author concludes by embracing these fast-paced, addictive experiences as a product of the current environment, even if they lack lasting impact.

Dopamine release can happen in as fast as 0.2 seconds.

That's why vibe coding is so hot in the crypto space right now.

For a long time, the market environment hasn't been great, and I had lost interest in new things, like some of the "little toys" made by vibe coding. Even the "Life K-Line" game, which was so popular it made it to CCTV, didn't change my disappointed view on industry innovation.

In my original perception, the things vibe coding produces now could only be at the level of games like "Emperor's Growth Plan" made by the Flatfish Studio—having little to do with "doing serious work." They create buzz, not accumulation; emotion, not value. I preferred to believe what those who would still impact the world twenty years after their death said, and I'd rather spend my time on products that might still be great two decades from now, not on this noise that looks like it could be washed away by the next wave of trends.

Until today, after Crypto Veda's explanations and my colleagues practically forcing it on me, I spent a few hours playing Rug Pull Simulator (Token Launch Simulator), the meme exit game Rug Pull Simulator (a coincidental同名 with the previous one) by GMGN boss Haze (Brother Chicken), and Tykoo Muscle Bro's FDV guessing game Vesting Victim—all products of this vibe coding wave.

So addictive.

How to describe this kind of pleasure? It's like you've been watching long videos on Bilibili and suddenly try Douyin for the first time; or like being used to a slow-burning relationship and suddenly experiencing fast-food romance; or like someone long suppressed by life getting high on drugs for the first time.

Take the Token Launch Simulator, for example. You start from the perspective of a project side, which isn't exactly moral. You have a limited amount of startup capital, the product is still at the PPT stage, and you decide what to do next, how to play with your users and community.

One operational cycle is a month, and you can only do two things, so resources are limited. You invest your limited resources and money into product development, narrative spreading, community operations, etc. The game doesn't tell you which path is right. Then, uncertain events pop up one after another: sometimes funding comes through, sometimes regulators target you, sometimes the community suddenly spirals out of control, sometimes security risks explode.

The pleasure emerges right here.

This pleasure doesn't come from eventually winning A9, A10 levels of wealth, but from the constant, continuous, never-ending immediate feedback. You just can't stop.

Another example is Brother Chicken's Rug Pull Simulator, a testing ground for trading memecoins, a speed-run version of GMGN's game. The pleasure lies in the rhythm of "exiting at the top." Buy low, spend marketing points to pump the price. If it pumps too fast, you fear a rug pull; if it's too slow, you get impatient. Successfully exit at the top, and profits are immediately credited—it feels like you've truly mastered the market's rhythm. Fail, and you can immediately try again.

Dopamine release in 0.2 seconds, faster than feedback in real trading.

Then there's Vesting Victim. While it doesn't have high-frequency clicking or the直观刺激 of price charts, it plays on your intuition about valuation. Based on a project's TVL, user count, funding situation, you judge its FDV, input the number, and the next second the system tells you the deviation. This "second-level verification" makes it impossible to stop. You unconsciously want to play another round—this time I'll guess more accurately—your nervous system directly receiving reward signals.

This is also the most addictive part of vibe coding. It doesn't need grand narratives or long-term investment. Copilot, Cursor, AI templates have drastically compressed the time from "an idea to a playable demo." It also doesn't rely on any future promises. No one expects today's vibe coding to produce great projects; being "fun today" is enough.

We just need to make choices in the present, get immediate feedback, and experience the pleasure of operations and results directly mapping onto our nerves. And this kind of pleasure is more direct, real, and easier to spread virally on social media than any complex economic model, long-term strategy, or whiteboard prediction.

The essence of vibe coding is, in a market where no one believes in long-term narratives anymore, monetizing attention with the lowest delivery cost.

It is, in a sense, the industrialization of dopamine—small doses, fast feedback, low addiction threshold, high repeat engagement; a form that is more brutal for project teams and more honest for users; and a natural product of today's market environment.

So when this era arrives, don't resist it, and stop lecturing about profound insights and morality. Let's indulge together in these fast-food toys, enjoy the pleasure of immediate feedback, enjoy the dopamine.

Even if it might never be great.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core appeal of Vibe Coding games in the crypto space according to the article?

AThe core appeal is the immediate, continuous feedback loop that triggers dopamine release in as fast as 0.2 seconds, offering a highly addictive and entertaining experience without the promise of long-term value or a grand narrative.

QName two specific Vibe Coding games mentioned in the article and describe their core mechanics.

A1. Rug Pull Simulator (by an unnamed team): Players assume the role of a project founder with limited resources, making monthly decisions on development, marketing, or community management, and dealing with random events. 2. Another Rug Pull Simulator (by Haze from GMGN): A memecoin trading sim where players buy low, use marketing points to pump the price, and attempt to sell at the top for instant profit.

QHow does the article describe the development process of Vibe Coding projects?

AThe article states that the development process is extremely compressed. Using tools like Copilot, Cursor, and AI templates, an idea can be turned into a playable demo very quickly, requiring no long-term investment or complex future promises.

QWhat does the article suggest is the 'essence' of Vibe Coding in the current market?

AThe essence of Vibe Coding is described as the industrialization of dopamine, using the lowest delivery cost to instantly monetize attention in a market where no one believes in long-term narratives anymore.

QWhat was the author's initial opinion on Vibe Coding, and how did it change?

AThe author initially viewed Vibe Coding products as mere noise, creating temporary hype and emotion rather than lasting value, comparable to simple games. Their opinion changed after trying the games themselves, finding the immediate feedback and addictive '爽感' (shuǎng gǎn - pleasurable feeling) to be incredibly compelling.

Letture associate

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are poised for historic IPOs within weeks, potentially raising a combined $180 billion—a sum exceeding the entire internet bubble's fundraising. The hosts of the Limitless Podcast argue this isn't just individual company financing but an unprecedented capital concentration for AI infrastructure, driven by an insatiable need for compute, data centers, power, and chips. SpaceX's IPO is notable for reportedly changing market index rules to allow faster inclusion, potentially funneling trillions in passive retirement funds into its stock, despite its unproven space-based data center business model. In contrast, Anthropic demonstrates explosive growth, with ARR reportedly hitting $45 billion and approaching profitability, fueled by strong enterprise adoption of products like Claude Code. Google's separate $80 billion raise highlights the immense capital pressure, even for giants. The discussion acknowledges bubble risks but leans optimistic. The hosts contend the massive spending is building essential physical infrastructure for the next technological era. A key bottleneck isn't capital but the real-world limits of chip manufacturing and construction speed. As long as demand for AI compute outstrips supply, this investment cycle represents a foundational build-out rather than a purely financial bubble. All three companies are seen as foundational bets on the future, with Anthropic often cited as the most immediately compelling due to its proven revenue trajectory.

marsbit2 h fa

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

marsbit2 h fa

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbit2 h fa

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbit2 h fa

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbit2 h fa

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片