There is no new boss YET

比推Pubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

An Iranian deputy military commander from a southern district stated that the Strait of Hormuz has not been blockaded, but only vessels from the U.S. and Israel are prohibited from passing through. This caused a sharp, temporary drop in market prices for oil, gas, and container shipping routes (except European shipping, which remained down). The statement contrasts with Spain's recent refusal to allow the U.S. to use its bases for operations against Iran, where a spokesperson grimly warned of rising energy prices. Around the same time, a U.S. oil tanker sank in the Strait of Hormuz after reportedly “hitting a reef”—a claim viewed by some as corroboration of Iran’s military reports suggesting it was struck by a missile. The information landscape is filled with conflicting narratives, and all claims may be considered both true and false depending on perspective, as psychological and media operations are integral to modern warfare. There is no single authoritative voice in this conflict; even figures like Trump have contributed to the confusion with performative statements. Amid the chaos, all sides are maneuvering for strategic advantage, while humanitarian concerns are overshadowed by geopolitical games. The situation reflects a self-destructive struggle on a global scale.

Just now, uh, a deputy commander of a military district in southern Iran said something: 'We have not blocked the Strait of Hormuz,' only prohibiting ships from the US and Israel from passing. This instantly scared the market into a slide, things like European shipping, oil, gas. Scared the hell out of them, a complete mess, but at this moment, most have deeply V-recovered [except for European shipping].

This is in stark contrast to the Spanish spokesperson who, with a grave expression [at a press conference announcing Spain's refusal to negotiate with the US and allow the use of Spanish bases to attack Iran], repeatedly stated that oil and gas prices are bound to rise.

At the moment of speaking, a US oil tanker 'ran aground' and sank in the Strait of Hormuz. Think about it, 'running aground' in the world's busiest energy transport artery. This actually verifies the Iranian military's combat report. It was sunk by a missile.

Some might say, with so many messages and news, which one is true? Who is fooling whom? Actually, all can be considered true (truth mixed with falsehood, falsehood mixed with truth, remember all is fair in war.), because there is no leading figure or authority now [even if there is, like Trump giving himself a 15 out of 10 (evaluating US-Iran actions at a press conference, scoring himself, full marks 10.), it would be full of drama, and the war of public opinion has always been synchronized with the overall war and runs through it from beginning to end.]. The information released by all parties at any given moment can be considered true, but viewed from the overall situation or different standpoints, it can also be considered false. 'Everyone' is searching for the kind of 'ladder' Littlefinger talked about in the chaos, collecting as many chips as possible.

As for humanity, as for compassion. Amidst the complex and numerous coercions, there is temporarily no place for them to stand. This is the self-inflicted disaster of a group of microorganisms on this planet.

Whatever, bro.

#KingOfWar#King of War

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617058

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the Iranian commander's statement about not blocking the Strait of Hormuz?

AThe market was instantly frightened, causing a sharp decline in prices for routes like European container shipping, oil, and gas. However, these prices mostly experienced a deep V-shaped recovery shortly after, except for European container shipping.

QHow did the Spanish spokesperson's statement contrast with the Iranian commander's?

AThe Spanish spokesperson, with a grave expression, repeatedly stated that oil and gas prices would inevitably rise during a press conference where Spain refused to negotiate with the U.S. on using its bases to attack Iran. This formed a sharp contrast to the Iranian commander's statement that they were not blocking the strait but only banning U.S. and Israeli ships.

QWhat incident is reported to have occurred in the Strait of Hormuz that seemingly confirmed Iran's military report?

AA U.S. oil tanker was reported to have 'run aground' and sunk in the Strait of Hormuz. The article suggests this was a cover story and that the tanker was actually sunk by a missile, validating Iran's military claims.

QAccording to the article, why is it difficult to determine the truth from the various news and messages circulating?

AThe article states that all information released by various parties can be considered true at the moment it is given, but when viewed from an overall perspective or different standpoints, it can also be considered false. There is no single authoritative source, and information warfare is full of deception and drama, making it hard to discern the absolute truth.

QWhat is the overall tone of the article towards the geopolitical situation described?

AThe tone is cynical and pessimistic, describing the situation as a chaotic melee where parties are fighting for leverage, with humanity and compassion having no place. It concludes with a resigned 'so be it' attitude, referring to the conflict as the自作孽 (self-inflicted disaster) of the planet's microbes.

Letture associate

Following the Coldcard Hack, One of the Largest Bitcoin Wallet Hacks Recently, a New Wave of Losses Begins! Losses Are Mounting

Following a major hack targeting Coldcard hardware wallets, losses have surged to approximately 1,367 BTC ($88.6 million) across 4,585 addresses. The third wave of attacks stole an additional 207.7 BTC, exhibiting different patterns from the first two. While initial attacks used shared deposit addresses and targeted P2WPKH wallets, the latest wave employed unique recipient addresses per victim and focused on P2WSH addresses. Analysis by Galaxy Research cannot definitively link all three waves to the same attacker, raising the possibility of a second actor exploiting the known vulnerability. The stolen funds, predominantly from wallets holding under 1 BTC, remain unspent. The vulnerable Coldcard firmware was released in March 2021, and all stolen coins originate from after that date.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Following the Coldcard Hack, One of the Largest Bitcoin Wallet Hacks Recently, a New Wave of Losses Begins! Losses Are Mounting

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trump Media sells another 2,628 BTC, holdings fall to 4,261 BTC

Trump Media & Technology Group has sold an additional 2,628 Bitcoin (worth approximately $165 million), continuing a series of sales over the past seven months. According to blockchain data from Arkham cited by Lookonchain, these latest transfers to Crypto.com bring the company's total reported Bitcoin sales to 7,281 BTC (worth about $545 million), reducing its holdings by 63%. The company's remaining Bitcoin holdings now stand at 4,261 BTC, valued at $269.8 million. Trump Media initially purchased 11,542 BTC at an average price of $118,522 before beginning the sales. This activity occurs amid broader scrutiny of crypto ventures linked to former President Donald Trump, as lawmakers debate the CLARITY Act, which focuses on ethics rules, digital asset ownership, and potential conflicts of interest for public officials.

cointelegraph1 h fa

Trump Media sells another 2,628 BTC, holdings fall to 4,261 BTC

cointelegraph1 h fa

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

In Fujian's Jinjiang, a city known for sportswear, lies a quiet semiconductor giant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. (JHICC). Once a promising domestic DRAM manufacturer alongside Yangtze Memory and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), its journey was derailed in 2018 when the U.S. placed it on an Entity List and filed criminal charges for alleged trade secret theft. This halted production for years. A turning point came in February 2024 when a U.S. federal court found JHICC not guilty. However, it had lost crucial time. While CXMT soared to become a top-valued A-share company in 2024, JHICC, with an estimated valuation of 80 billion RMB, was just restarting. Its current output is primarily customized DDR4 chips, not the advanced DDR5/HBM demanded for AI, but it still benefits from the broader memory chip upcycle. JHICC's story is tied to Chen Zhengkun, a veteran engineer who left Micron to lead the venture. Founded in 2016 with state-backed funding, JHICC partnered with Taiwan's UMC to develop DRAM technology. Rapid progress was cut short by the U.S. actions, which Micron initiated, partly due to its heavy reliance on the Chinese market. Post-sanctions, Chen's team worked to rebuild the production line with reduced reliance on U.S. technology. According to its records, JHICC achieved small-scale production and revenue growth under immense pressure. It now focuses on the stable "niche" DRAM market (e.g., TVs, routers) with a monthly capacity of ~40,000 wafers, aiming for 60,000 by 2026. It holds over 1,000 patents but remains on the Entity List. For Jinjiang, investing in JHICC was a bold industrial leap. The local government provided unwavering financial and logistical support during the crisis, helping the company survive. JHICC has become the anchor for a growing local semiconductor cluster. Though its scale lags behind domestic peers, JHICC's persistence symbolizes a hard-won foothold in a global market long dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Having missed one boom, it seeks a place in the new AI-driven memory supercycle.

marsbit2 h fa

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

marsbit2 h fa

Amid a 38GW Power Shortage, Why Have Bitcoin Mining Facilities Suddenly Become the New Gateway to AI Compute?

Under the impending threat of a 38GW power deficit projected for US data centers between 2026-2028, decommissioned Bitcoin mining sites are emerging as critical infrastructure for AI compute. A growing number of listed North American miners—including TeraWulf, Hut 8, and Cipher Mining—are pivoting to become "Powered Shell Providers." They are repurposing their existing assets: pre-approved grid connections, land, and substations to offer ready-to-use data center shells to cloud providers and AI companies. This shift capitalizes on the severe bottleneck in securing new, large-scale power access, which can take 5-7 years. Analysts at Morgan Stanley estimate retrofitted mining facilities could supply 10-19GW of the needed capacity. The core value proposition is no longer cryptocurrency mining, but selling a scarce "time to power" advantage in the race for AI infrastructure.

华尔街日报2 h fa

Amid a 38GW Power Shortage, Why Have Bitcoin Mining Facilities Suddenly Become the New Gateway to AI Compute?

华尔街日报2 h fa

Michael Saylor: 'We Never Said We Would Never Sell Bitcoin'

Michael Saylor stated that his company never made a commitment to never sell its bitcoin holdings, though it expects to remain a net buyer of bitcoin long-term. His comments came following reports that the company had received new authorization to sell up to $5 billion in bitcoin. Saylor clarified that this authorization is not new and was announced on June 29th as part of the company's capital management strategy. He emphasized that the authorization permits but does not obligate sales for specific purposes and that no new approval has been announced. Saylor also noted the company never officially adopted a "bitcoin will never be sold" policy.

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Michael Saylor: 'We Never Said We Would Never Sell Bitcoin'

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Trading

Spot