The US Stock Market in 2026, It's Almost Too Easy, and That Makes Me Nervous

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-08

Introduzione

The U.S. stock market's performance in 2026, particularly in the semiconductor memory sector, has generated significant returns that make some investors uneasy. A popular sentiment contrasts the perceived skill required for success in China's A-shares with the apparent ease of profiting from simply holding U.S. stocks. The primary driver is a global memory chip boom. Stocks like Micron, Seagate, Western Digital, and especially SanDisk (spinning off from WDC in 2025) have skyrocketed, with some gains exceeding 500% or even 2200%. Korean giants Samsung and SK Hynix, dominating their domestic index, have also surged. This rally is fueled by an AI-driven demand surge for memory like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory), critical for AI chips. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft are placing massive, "unpriced" orders, while analysts continuously upgrade forecasts. SK Hynix reported its 2026 HBM capacity is already sold out. Despite record profits and sky-high margins (e.g., SK Hynix's 72% operating margin), major memory manufacturers are deliberately restricting capital expenditure and capacity expansion, controlling over 90% of DRAM supply. This supply discipline sustains high prices but draws parallels to cartel behavior. The situation presents two narratives. The bullish case sees AI demand as a structural, long-term shift with a prolonged supply gap. The bearish case, exemplified by short-seller Citron's failed bet against SanDisk, warns of a classic commodity cycle where prices e...

「Making money in the A-share market proves you have skill, luck, courage, competence, foresight, insight, and patience.

Making money in the US stock market only proves you have money in the US stock market.」

This has become the reality for most US stock traders in 2026.

Those who quietly bought US memory stocks, uninstalled the app, and went to relax, logged back in one day to find their accounts had multiplied several times over.

Spurred by the US market, A-share memory stocks are also taking off.

Crypto enthusiasts have shifted from discussing memecoins and altcoins to talking about US stocks: 「I live every day in fear of US stocks rising and BTC falling」.

New account holders pose the soul-searching question in group chats: Why is making money in US stocks so easy?

1. Who's Actually Rising in the US Stock Market?

The clear capital theme in the 2026 global market is storage.

Justin Sun was among the first to tout the storage sector in late 2025.

As netizens calculated, if you had bought US memory-related stocks at the time Sun made his call:

If you bought Micron, you'd be up +222%; if you bought Seagate, up +256%; if you bought Western Digital, up +280%; if you bought SanDisk, up +515%.

If you had invested 500,000 yuan in SanDisk stock a year ago, you would now have 15 million yuan.

What exactly is 'storage'?

Memory chips are the components in computers and phones responsible for 'remembering' things, divided into two types: DRAM handles short-term memory, used to temporarily store data while programs run; NAND handles long-term memory, where your phone's photos and files are stored. Choosing between 128G and 256G for a phone—that capacity is NAND.

Globally, the companies capable of producing these two things number no more than five.

The stocks of these five companies have surged this way over the past year:

SanDisk, spun off from Western Digital in February 2025, an old company making USB drives and SSDs, saw its stock price peak at a 22-fold increase.

Micron, a cyclical stock shunned by fund managers for a decade, rose over 550% in a year, with gross margins pulled from 18% to 56%. Apple's gross margin is about 43%, already considered a high-water mark for profitability in tech. Micron is now higher.

SK Hynix is up 123% this year. Samsung is up 94%.

Seagate, Western Digital, both at all-time highs.

Then there's South Korea.

Samsung and SK Hynix together account for over 30% of the weighting of South Korea's KOSPI index. In 2025, they drove the entire Korean stock market up 76%, clinching the annual champion title among major global indices.

Two memory makers' explosive performance lifted an entire nation's stock market.

On the price side, it's even more direct. DDR4 memory chips, $1.45 at the start of 2025, peaked at $17 in February 2026, an almost 12-fold increase in a year. Kingston 16GB memory sticks in Huaqiangbei rose from 200 yuan to 800 yuan. Part of the reason your recent phone or computer purchase was more expensive lies in these stocks you didn't buy.

SK Hynix's Q1 2026 net profit exploded by 398%, with an operating margin of 72%. Samsung Electronics' overall operating profit skyrocketed 755% year-on-year.

Sell 100 yuan worth of memory, 72 yuan is profit, 28 yuan is cost. This isn't doing business anymore; this is mining.

2. Institutions Have Lost Their Minds Even More Than Retail

In a typical market, institutions are the ones in sharp suits, expressionlessly saying "we are bullish long-term on fundamentals," while retail investors are the ones shouting "to the moon!" in group chats.

In the 2025-2026 storage sector, the institutions went crazy first.

Google, Microsoft, Amazon began placing "price-unlimited, quantity-unlimited" open orders with Micron.

The term "price-unlimited" is worth pondering. It means you name your price, we pay it, no haggling. This procurement method usually appears in wartime scenarios when governments buy military supplies.

In 2025-2026, it appeared in tech companies buying memory sticks.

Broadcom locked in supply through 2028.

SK Hynix said at an investor conference: "Our 2026 HBM production capacity is completely sold out."

Completely. The entire year.

HBM is high-end memory specifically designed to work with AI chips. For every AI chip Nvidia sells, a piece of HBM must accompany it. Globally, only SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron can make HBM, with SK Hynix holding about 57% market share. "Completely sold out" means one of the most critical components in global AI infrastructure has no spares for the entire year of 2026.

Then came the analysts.

Within three months, Wall Street's consensus estimate for SanDisk's 2026 EPS was revised up by 172%. Citigroup predicted a 144% year-on-year increase in the average price of server DRAM in 2026. Nomura said the supercycle would last at least until 2027, with meaningful supply increases earliest in 2028. Melius upgraded Micron to Buy after the stock had already risen hundreds of percent, adding "still 41% upside over the next 12 months," without blushing or losing breath.

DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis publicly stated that the overall memory supply chain is constrained, hampering massive AI deployment. Intel CEO Dr. Randhir Thakur (Note: The article uses "陈立武", likely a mistake or alias; actual CEO at the time is Pat Gelsinger, but the translation follows the text) said memory shortages won't ease before 2028.

Then SK Hynix secretly filed with the SEC to issue ADRs in the US, aiming to raise up to $15 billion. A company with fully sold-out capacity and a 72% profit margin decided to go raise more money in New York, reasoning that the Korean market gives too low a valuation, while US investors understand AI better and are willing to pay a higher price.

The A-share market followed suit.

DeMingLi hit limit-up, BIWIN Storage surged, Longsys rose 41%. Small player Shannon Semi's Q1 net profit was preliminarily estimated to grow 6714% to 8747%, a quadruple-digit increase. Topics in finance groups shifted from "Is CSI 300 still worth buying?" to "Which to buy, Micron or SK Hynix?" People who didn't know how to spell HBM two months ago started explaining how High Bandwidth Memory works in group chats.

Even many matchmaking groups started discussing memory stocks.

3. The Most Ironic Scene

On February 24, 2026, Citron Research announced it was shorting SanDisk, giving three reasons.

First, memory is cyclical. 2008, 2012, 2018—each period of high profitability ended in a crash. Existing capacity is already double the 2018 peak. Supply release is just a matter of time.

Second, SanDisk sells a commodity.

"Nvidia has a moat; SanDisk is just a commodity." Nvidia's moat is its CUDA software ecosystem; almost all global AI models run on it, making switching costs extremely high.

SanDisk's SSDs? Samsung could make an identical one tomorrow, possibly cheaper.

Third, major shareholder Western Digital is massively selling SanDisk shares at a 25% discount to the market price.

Selling their own stock at a 25% off. Needing cash urgently is one possibility; another is thinking it will be cheaper later. Neither scenario is called being bullish on future prospects.

Two trading days later, SanDisk rebounded and later continued to hit new all-time highs. Citron's report circulated in various finance groups, becoming meme material.

One question was skipped by everyone: Whose accounts did those shares sold at a 25% discount ultimately end up in?

4. Making Money in US Stocks, As Easy as Breathing?

The world's three most profitable memory companies, at the peak of their profits, collectively chose not to expand production.

SK Hynix's 2025 capital expenditure related to HBM fell 50% year-on-year, officially citing concerns about oversupply in 2027. Samsung's 2026 DRAM capacity growth is only about 5%, far below demand growth.

The entire industry's capital expenditure growth is only 14%, while historically during each expansion phase it's typically 30% to 50%.

Three companies controlling 92% of global DRAM capacity simultaneously choosing not to expand production has a name in any other commodity market: supply-side coordination. OPEC did this with oil, resulting in the 1973 oil crisis. The concentration in the memory chip market is even higher than OPEC's; the combined market share of these three is something thirteen oil-producing nations can't achieve.

Investors interpreting "manufacturers' restraint in expansion" as a positive is logically not wrong; prices can indeed be sustained longer. But what this structure means for the buyers on the other end isn't in any analyst report.

Two plausible narratives can be told about this rally.

The first: AI's demand for memory is a structural shift. AI models in the inference era need to remember increasingly long contexts, requiring memory in orders of magnitude more. The three major memory makers control 92% of capacity, new fabs won't be operational until 2027 at the earliest, and the gap won't disappear before then.

The second: It's just like every other time in history. The 2000 dot-com bubble narrative was "the internet changes everything," which was true. The 2008 subprime narrative was "housing prices won't fall nationwide," which also held up based on historical data back then. The real problem is never whether the story is right, but whether the price has already discounted that story.

The memory industry has an ironclad rule, unbroken for 30 years: Prices rise slowly, but fall fast.

During the 2018 supercycle, from peak to halving took less than two quarters.

No one knows which day this cycle's peak will be. Including those selling shares at a 25% discount, or rather, especially those selling shares at a 25% discount, because they are selling chips—and selling chips to those who are currently believing the story is the most efficient.

The last time you bought a phone, upgrading the memory from 128G to 256G cost you an extra three or four hundred yuan. That three or four hundred yuan traveled through an industry chain, distributing profits layer by layer, and a tiny portion of it ultimately appeared in SK Hynix's 72% operating margin, in Samsung's 755% profit growth, and in all those stocks you didn't buy.

It also, of course, finally aggregates into the moment you open any social media app and see others' soul-searching question: Why is making money in US stocks so easy?

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main investment theme driving the global capital markets in 2026, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the main investment theme driving global capital markets in 2026 is the storage sector, specifically storage memory chips.

QHow did the profitability of leading storage companies like SK Hynix compare to that of Apple in 2026, as mentioned in the article?

AThe article states that in 2026, Micron Technology, a leading storage company, achieved a gross margin of 56%, which was higher than Apple's gross margin of approximately 43%. SK Hynix's operating profit margin was reported to be 72%.

QWhy did Citron Research issue a short report on SanDisk in February 2026, and what was the subsequent market reaction?

ACitron Research issued a short report on SanDisk on February 24, 2026. Their main arguments were that the storage sector is cyclical, SanDisk's products are commodities without a strong moat, and its major shareholder, Western Digital, was selling shares at a 25% discount. The market's initial reaction was a price dip, but SanDisk's stock rebounded after two trading days and continued to reach new highs, making the report a subject of memes in financial chat groups.

QWhat is HBM memory, and why is its supply critically tight in 2026?

AHBM (High Bandwidth Memory) is a high-end type of memory specifically designed to work with AI chips, like those from Nvidia. The article explains that in 2026, the supply of HBM was critically tight because SK Hynix, which holds about 57% of the market, stated its entire 2026 HBM production capacity was already sold out for the year. This shortage is a key bottleneck for global AI infrastructure deployment.

QAccording to the article, what is a unique and potentially concerning behavior of the top three storage companies during the 2026 market boom?

AA unique and potentially concerning behavior highlighted in the article is that during the peak of profitability in 2026, the top three global storage companies (Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron) collectively chose not to significantly expand their production capacity. Their capital expenditure growth was much lower than historical norms during expansion periods. This lack of supply increase, while supporting high prices, creates a market structure reminiscent of coordinated supply-side control, similar to OPEC in the oil market.

Letture associate

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit18 min fa

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit18 min fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片